Jump to content

How many days per week do you practice white supremacy?


Recommended Posts

This Alabama cracker clearly practices daily:

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4011157-tubervilles-white-nationalist-comments-roil-military-diversity-debate/

Tuberville found himself at the center of a storm of criticism last week over his interview with a local NPR station in Alabama, during which he was asked whether he thought white nationalists should be allowed to enlist and serve in the military. 

“Well, they call them that. I call them Americans,” he replied in an interview with WBHM in Birmingham. 

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With talks beginning on the annual defense authorization bill next month, political clashes are sure to heat up over Defense Department (DOD) programs to weed out those with extreme views while promoting diversity and inclusion.

 

“Sen. Tuberville’s quote that is cited shows that he was being skeptical of the notion that there are white nationalists in the military, not that he believes they should be in the military,” his office told AL.com. 

A spokesman for Tuberville told The Washington Post that the senator “resents the implication that the people in our military are anything but patriots and heroes.”

 

However, Democratic lawmakers and top military officials say the programs are necessary to keep out those who would taint the ranks with extreme views and keep cohesion strong in a diverse organization. 

Biden and Austin said as much in their commencement speeches at two historically Black universities on Saturday. 

 

In his speech at Howard University, Biden urged unity “against the poison of white supremacy,” declaring it “the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland.” 

 

But Via of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism said Republicans are pointing to dwindling recruitment numbers as “an excuse to not take these necessary steps to root out far-right extremism in our armed forces.” 

 

And interesting how the Global project against hate and extremism (PAC) does not disclose its donors.

 

https://globalextremism.org/financials/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

10 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

With talks beginning on the annual defense authorization bill next month, political clashes are sure to heat up over Defense Department (DOD) programs to weed out those with extreme views while promoting diversity and inclusion.

 

“Sen. Tuberville’s quote that is cited shows that he was being skeptical of the notion that there are white nationalists in the military, not that he believes they should be in the military,” his office told AL.com. 

A spokesman for Tuberville told The Washington Post that the senator “resents the implication that the people in our military are anything but patriots and heroes.”

 

However, Democratic lawmakers and top military officials say the programs are necessary to keep out those who would taint the ranks with extreme views and keep cohesion strong in a diverse organization. 

Biden and Austin said as much in their commencement speeches at two historically Black universities on Saturday. 

 

In his speech at Howard University, Biden urged unity “against the poison of white supremacy,” declaring it “the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland.” 

 

But Via of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism said Republicans are pointing to dwindling recruitment numbers as “an excuse to not take these necessary steps to root out far-right extremism in our armed forces.” 

 

And interesting how the Global project against hate and extremism (PAC) does not disclose its donors.

 

https://globalextremism.org/financials/

Ironically, The Global Project Against Hate and Extremism "hates" anyone that disagrees with them.  So no far-right views, but far-left views, are okay.   

 

No worries.  Our national defense will now depend on vetting enough candidates that can pass a social justice test.  That's comical.  You're not assembling a cast for a high school musical.  You're looking for people that are willing to enlist to train to kill the enemy.  There just aren't enough bi-coastal progressives and other marginalized groups that can physically or mentally qualify for combat. 

 

Another gem hiding behind the curtain for the public to consider is that when we get into any big tussle with China the only course of action the government will be left with the fill the ranks of the Army and Marines is bringing back the draft.    

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

“Sen. Tuberville’s quote that is cited shows that he was being skeptical of the notion that there are white nationalists in the military, not that he believes they should be in the military,” his office told AL.com. 

A spokesman for Tuberville told The Washington Post that the senator “resents the implication that the people in our military are anything but patriots and heroes.”

Once again, his own original words apparently aren't important.  It's how his spokesmen spin them that is...same as trump's words or revisions.  btw, many of the white nationalist insurrectionists were ex military and no doubt Tuberville knows that.  He or his spokesmen are lying.  Give it time though.  The racist and white supremacy themes are becoming more and more overt among the leading R politicians

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Once again, his own original words apparently aren't important.  It's how his spokesmen spin them that is...same as trump's words or revisions.

often times the facts are past the headline and one line quote. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

not this time...

Sure reads like it is the usual headline, from the usual sources, pushing the race card.  

 

And nice add, but what is going to get worse?  military recruitment?  

 

I guess it's better than discussing what they are cutting or raising in the NDAA itself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

:flirt:

 

tobias-funke-and-scene.gif

So I guess you are saying this was staged by a group trying to dis the "patriot front".  Why would anyone bother?  There's plenty of vids and pics of these fools available...Oh, and they have their own "production" group for recruitment

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/02/patriot-front-recruits-members-young-pyramid-scheme

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Sure reads like it is the usual headline, from the usual sources, pushing the race card.  

 

And nice add, but what is going to get worse?  military recruitment?  

 

I guess it's better than discussing what they are cutting or raising in the NDAA itself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The race hustle is all about the money.  Getting funds and grants, and donations, or extorting funds, from private parties to fund lavish lifestyles, attending lots of conferences, writing papers, and making speeches.  Not really doing much to improve the lives of the people they claim to champion.  While at the same time providing "protection" to the people they shake down from the mob they control.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

Still no reporting anywhere of nazis putting recruiting posters on trails. 

is that what all those colored marks on the trees are?

 

and here all this time I thought they were trail markers.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

Absolutely.  My motivations in a nutshell😂

It's all about the money. Cut off funding for all the social crusades and all the hustlers will scamper back to unemployment or God forbid, be forced to find real jobs.  

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The Hate Industry

The “anti-hate” hate industry creates the tribalism it claims to fight, and the only beneficiary of all the hate it creates is the hate industry itself.

By Edward Ring

 

"The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy."
— President Joe Biden, speaking at Howard University, May 13, 2023

 

In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, when establishment politicians started to make common use of the term “homeland,” they told us the most dangerous threat to Americans was foreign terrorists. But today, we are instructed to fear the enemy within. A new iconic date, January 6, 2021, is inscribed on our collective consciousness. From coast to coast, Americans are being herded into two camps. There are the “white supremacists,” those bad people who purportedly hate good people. And then there is everyone else, good people who are encouraged to hate the bad people.

 

The common thread, to state the obvious, is hate.

 

As Joe Biden’s would-be successor, doing his part to nurture and support the hate industry, California Governor Gavin Newsom on May 4 announced “the Launch of CA vs Hate, a New Statewide Hotline to Report Hate Acts in California.” Proclaiming that “hate will not be tolerated,” the governor said that Californians will have “another tool to ensure that not only justice is served, but that individuals have access to additional resources to help deal with the lingering wounds that remain after such a horrendous crime occurs.”

 

This is agenda-driven hype. The agenda, perfectly expressed by author Michael Shellenberger in a Substack post last week, is to “manufacture a fake ‘hate’ crisis as [a] pretext for mass spying, blacklists, and censorship.” The hype, also exposed by Shellenberger in his recent article, is underscored by the fact that over the past 10 years, hate crime convictions, as opposed to “criminal complaints of hate crimes,” have not increased at all. In a state with 40 million people, hate crime convictions were a minuscule 109 in 2021, and a negligible increase from 107 in 2012.

 

The hate industry is a vast agglomeration of lucrative hustles, now institutionalized and expanded into multiple and overlapping sectors. There is the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) sector; the equity, social, and governance (ESG) sector; the activist sector comprising countless groups, including Black Lives Matter and Antifa; the corporate, academic, and government sectors; the media sector; the politicians; and the pundits. All of these sectors have spawned scores of thousands of well-paying jobs.

 

If these institutions weren’t able to point to rising levels of hatred in America, then their specialty, the business of hate, would no longer be a growth industry. Where there is no hate, they must manufacture it. Where hatred has diminished, they must discover new forms of hate, often so subtle that we foolishly fail to recognize it without their assistance.

 

Peddling Hate Is a Dangerous Game

 

It’s a dangerous and divisive game. For hate to exist, you have to have a hater and a victim of hate. And who might they be? A list of Newsom’s “Community Specific Resources for People Targeted for Hate” might provide a clue. Virtually every imaginable group is listed as “people targeted for hate,” including “Communities living at the intersection of multiple identities (Coming Soon).” Isn’t that great? Resources for those who live “at the intersection of multiple identities” is “coming soon.” They’re awfully busy at the State of California’s Civil Rights Department. These, we are told, are the victims.

 

Much more at the link: https://amgreatness.com/2023/05/17/the-hate-industry/

 

 

.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...