Jump to content

Iran Is On Fire


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Doc said:

Why offer any condolences for this POS?  Hell even Iranians are celebrating that he died.

 

Not a WORD out of you regarding this:

 

Trump on Otto Warmbier's death: Kim Jong Un wasn't to blame

 

 

"Some really bad things happened to Otto — some really, really bad things. But he tells me that he didn't know about it, and I will take him at his word," Trump said, referring to the North Korean dictator.

 

The president added that Kim told him that he "felt very badly about it."

 

190228-otto-warmbier-mc-834.JPG

 

salute-north.gif

 

 

Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit

 

"President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be"

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg

 

Sound familiar?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

BRICS already accounted for a larger share of world GDP than the G7 (31.6% at purchasing power parity (PPP) in 2022; see Chart 1), and the expansion has increased this share to over a third (35.6% in

2022)

https://www.statista.com/chart/30638/brics-and-g7-share-of-global-gdp/

 

 

According to visualcapitalist.com, BRICS countries have a higher average growth forecast than the G7 in 2024, at 3.6% compared to the G7's 1%. BRICS countries are also expected to see the highest surge in millionaire populations over the next decade. India is predicted to have the highest growth in the 2020s, with a 110% increase in wealth by 2033. Saudi Arabia is second, with its wealth expected to expand by over 105% in the next 10 years, followed by the UAE at 95%. China is expected to have an 85% increase, while Ethiopia is expected to have a 75% increase, and South Africa is expected to have a 60% increase. 

Edited by Tommy Callahan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ya, Trump had to back down from this insanity, quoted from the very link you supplied, thanks!

I'm glad to help.  I often worry that you do not have access to current news on the commune you are staying at, it always seems you're five+ steps behind what is happening currently. 

 

As it stands, Trump has clarified his stance on Russia and the invasion into Ukraine.  You obviously believe he is correct on that analysis, and that represents a change to his original position you felt was unreasonable. 

 

All that said, Biden and his inner circle are mourning the loss of men sworn to destroy not democrats and republicans, not liberals, independents or conservatives, but all Americans.   Between that and the $10b they handed out to kickstart their terror campaigns, it's impossible to justify the stance here.  Yet, you do.  

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

All that said, Biden and his inner circle are mourning the loss of men sworn to destroy not democrats and republicans, not liberals, independents or conservatives, but all Americans.   Between that and the $10b they handed out to kickstart their terror campaigns, it's impossible to justify the stance here.  Yet, you do. 

 

Seriously, I don't know if you could possibly HACK harder.

 

J

F

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Not a WORD out of you regarding this:

 

Trump on Otto Warmbier's death: Kim Jong Un wasn't to blame

 

 

"Some really bad things happened to Otto — some really, really bad things. But he tells me that he didn't know about it, and I will take him at his word," Trump said, referring to the North Korean dictator.

 

The president added that Kim told him that he "felt very badly about it."

 

190228-otto-warmbier-mc-834.JPG

 

salute-north.gif

 

 

Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit

 

"President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be"

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg

 

Sound familiar?

 

No.  It's one thing to try and placate a murderous, crazy dictator while they're alive.  It's another to offer condolences when they die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

No.  It's one thing to try and placate a murderous, crazy dictator while they're alive.  It's another to offer condolences when they die.

 

OMFG - Trump is still praising dictators - jfc

 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.690ddb98400b976323ee81e8b1e4abea.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.yahoo.com/news/raisi-death-threatens-instability-iran-174728884.html

 

Quote

BERLIN — The sudden death of Iran’s president, Ebrahim Raisi, opens a new chapter of instability just as the increasingly unpopular Islamic Republic is engaged in selecting its next supreme leader. Raisi, 63, had been considered a prime candidate, especially favored by the powerful Revolutionary Guard.

Even before the helicopter crash that killed Raisi, the regime had been consumed with internal political struggles as the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 85, the longest-serving head of state in the Middle East, is in declining health.

But given fears of instability at a time when the Islamic Republic is facing internal protests, a weak economy, endemic corruption and tensions with Israel, analysts expect little change in Iran’s foreign or domestic policies. Khamenei has set the direction for the country, and any new president will not alter it much.

this helps me know what to expect next.  @All_Pro_Bills was correct

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Seriously, I don't know if you could possibly HACK harder.

 

J

F

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When they have nothing else....they hack and and hack...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

When they have nothing else....they hack and and hack...

 

 

 

For your information, Tibs, it's acceptable to write LOVE letters and PRAISE dictators who have killed Americans and withdraw from nuclear deals AS LONG AS THEY ARE STILL ALIVE

 

However, if their President dies in a crash, it's inappropriate to send condolences to the Iranian people and criticize human rights abuses in the same press release.

 

jfc

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

When they have nothing else....they hack and and hack...

 

 

$10 billion dollars...sanctions lifted...expressing great sorrow at the death of an enemy...

 

"When they have nothing else...".

 

Great moments in absurd internet theater.  Well done Tibsy!

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

Who killed the Iran Nuclear deal?

 

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

$10 billion dollars...sanctions lifted...expressing great sorrow at the death of an enemy...

 

"When they have nothing else...".

 

Great moments in absurd internet theater.  Well done Tibsy!

 

 

MMMMHMMM

 

image.thumb.jpeg.f4a0b5364ce12b78b960b14a7e4d6a98.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.556510047a4c8be40a2cc9896f41e04d.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.60b1f93e9a2e2cafbd779c88c4cf82ed.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.2d8c0410912ca54bd2a300751fa5af64.jpeg

 

Well done, LENNY!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

When they have nothing else....they hack and and hack...

 

 

Do you believe it was a good idea for the Biden administration to issue condolences to Iran on the death of the Putin-y murderous terrorist known as the butcher of Tehran? Why or why not? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Do you believe it was a good idea for the Biden administration to issue condolences to Iran on the death of the Putin-y murderous terrorist known as the butcher of Tehran? Why or why not? 

 

Sending condolences to the people of Iran = BAD

 

Trump praising Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Lebanese Shia militia who the US designated a terrorist organization = SMART, VERY SMART

 

K2N4JmLi9SUbm.webp

 

lmao

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Actually, It Was the U.S. Who Killed Iranian President Raisi (Iran Says)

by Joe Cunningham

 

It is with a heavy heart that we must report who Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi's real killer is: The United States of America. At least, that's the implication from Iran, which needed a couple of days to get its story straight and blame "Western sanctions" on the poor quality of its helicopters, which led to Raisi's untimely demise. That talking point is now floating around, thanks to friendly media outlets willing to overlook (if not actually cheer on) Iran being a country run by very bad people. “One of the culprits behind yesterday’s tragedy is the United States, because of its sanctions that bar Iran from procuring essential aviation parts,”

 

https://redstate.com/joesquire/2024/05/21/actually-it-was-the-us-who-killed-iranian-president-raisi-n2174453

 

.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iran, Iran, Iran is on fire!

Iran, Iran, Iran is on fire!

Iran, Iran, Iran is on fire!

We do't need no water let the MF er burn!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...