Another Great Addition for a POTUS Resume !!

[T master]

I know there ae similar posts but this is something that is increasingly costing us tax payers more & more money yet the excuses & the turn the other head mentality just keeps on coming !!

 

By opening the Border like this administration has done it has created more than 1 problem for all of us here in the US instead of keeping a tight grasp on this the way it was it just keeps adding to the spending of money needlessly all the way around ... 

 

2 million undocumented immigrants and counting this year alone the most in history that's a great record to have on your resume as a POTUS !! 

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/border-patrol-agents-arrest-dozens-illegal-immigrant-criminals-gang-members

 

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/ms-13-gang-members-arrested-after-illegally-entering-us

 

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/illegal-immigrants-us-mexico-border-counties-costs-law-enforcement

Edited September 12, 2022 by T master

[Tiberius]

What? Not sure what you are arguing 

[T master]

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

What? Not sure what you are arguing 

 

Well not real surprising but i will tell you if you read the sentences in this post & then click on the links & read the articles that come up when you click on them you will get a much better idea of what this post is about . Which there are others I'm just adding to them in a another way .

 

I'm not arguing anything thing just stating the things that have happened since the laws were changed or done away with by this administration took over .

 

The articles i have put a link to tells how different gang members have made it here & how more illegal immigrants oh sorry "undocumented immigrants" (Don't want to be politically incorrect now do we) have crossed the border in the last year than ever in history .

 

And with that more criminals but that too is in those articles i posted that you i guess didn't read . Just saying .

[Tiberius]

12 minutes ago, T master said:

 

Well not real surprising but i will tell you if you read the sentences in this post & then click on the links & read the articles that come up when you click on them you will get a much better idea of what this post is about . Which there are others I'm just adding to them in a another way .

 

I'm not arguing anything thing just stating the things that have happened since the laws were changed or done away with by this administration took over .

 

The articles i have put a link to tells how different gang members have made it here & how more illegal immigrants oh sorry "undocumented immigrants" (Don't want to be politically incorrect now do we) have crossed the border in the last year than ever in history .

 

And with that more criminals but that too is in those articles i posted that you i guess didn't read . Just saying .

Well, good thing Biden is doing such a good job at everything. He's a good president. 

 

That last guy we had sucked so bad. Is he in jail yet? 

[Doc]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Well, good thing Biden is doing such a good job at everything. He's a good president. 

 

That last guy we had sucked so bad. Is he in jail yet? 

 

True.  You guys want the destruction of America.  So obviously you think he's a good president...

[Tiberius]

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

True.  You guys want the destruction of America.  So obviously you think he's a good president...

Beating a fascist army that is an enemy of America ---Check

 

Getting chip manufacturing done in America---Check 

 

Getting us a jump start on new green energy---Check 

 

Making America stronger! Joe Biden 

 

[Demongyz]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Beating a fascist army that is an enemy of America ---Check

 

Getting chip manufacturing done in America---Check 

 

Getting us a jump start on new green energy---Check 

 

Making America stronger! Joe Biden 

 

He hasn't done any of those things.

[Chef Jim]

5 minutes ago, Demongyz said:

He hasn't done any of those things.

 

75% of those are very ambiguous.

 

Made America stronger?  WTF does that even mean?  It can't be quantified so it's a useless remark. 

 

EDIT:  Make that 100% ambiguity.   

 

 

Edited September 12, 2022 by Chef Jim

[Doc]

Completely delusional.  Which is how they like them.

[nedboy7]

President Joe Biden has appointed more judges to the federal courts at this stage in his tenure than any president since John F. Kennedy, and his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center.

As of Aug. 8, the first day of the U.S. Senate’s August break, Biden has successfully appointed 75 judges to the three main tiers of the federal judicial system: the district courts, appeals courts and U.S. Supreme Court. That’s far more than the number appointed by Donald Trump (51) and Barack Obama (42) at the same stage in their presidencies, and slightly more than the number appointed by several other recent presidents – including George W. Bush (72), Bill Clinton (74) and Ronald Reagan (72) – by this point in their tenures.

 

[Buffarukus]

2 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

President Joe Biden has appointed more judges to the federal courts at this stage in his tenure than any president since John F. Kennedy, and his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center.

As of Aug. 8, the first day of the U.S. Senate’s August break, Biden has successfully appointed 75 judges to the three main tiers of the federal judicial system: the district courts, appeals courts and U.S. Supreme Court. That’s far more than the number appointed by Donald Trump (51) and Barack Obama (42) at the same stage in their presidencies, and slightly more than the number appointed by several other recent presidents – including George W. Bush (72), Bill Clinton (74) and Ronald Reagan (72) – by this point in their tenures.

 

 

history shall never forget brandon, the mightiest vacancy filler of them all! 

[Chef Jim]

3 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

President Joe Biden has appointed more judges to the federal courts at this stage in his tenure than any president since John F. Kennedy, and his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center.

As of Aug. 8, the first day of the U.S. Senate’s August break, Biden has successfully appointed 75 judges to the three main tiers of the federal judicial system: the district courts, appeals courts and U.S. Supreme Court. That’s far more than the number appointed by Donald Trump (51) and Barack Obama (42) at the same stage in their presidencies, and slightly more than the number appointed by several other recent presidents – including George W. Bush (72), Bill Clinton (74) and Ronald Reagan (72) – by this point in their tenures.

 

What does the race and gender of his appointees have to do with this?

[Tenhigh]

4 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

President Joe Biden has appointed more judges to the federal courts at this stage in his tenure than any president since John F. Kennedy, and his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center.

As of Aug. 8, the first day of the U.S. Senate’s August break, Biden has successfully appointed 75 judges to the three main tiers of the federal judicial system: the district courts, appeals courts and U.S. Supreme Court. That’s far more than the number appointed by Donald Trump (51) and Barack Obama (42) at the same stage in their presidencies, and slightly more than the number appointed by several other recent presidents – including George W. Bush (72), Bill Clinton (74) and Ronald Reagan (72) – by this point in their tenures.

 

Why is this a major accomplishment?  It is just freaking appointees.

 

But I do hope his other appointees weren't as racially and gender biased as his vp and Supreme Court picks. 

[Doc]

1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:

What does the race and gender of his appointees have to do with this?

 

Is all about social issues with them. 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

13 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

President Joe Biden has appointed more judges to the federal courts at this stage in his tenure than any president since John F. Kennedy, and his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center.

As of Aug. 8, the first day of the U.S. Senate’s August break, Biden has successfully appointed 75 judges to the three main tiers of the federal judicial system: the district courts, appeals courts and U.S. Supreme Court. That’s far more than the number appointed by Donald Trump (51) and Barack Obama (42) at the same stage in their presidencies, and slightly more than the number appointed by several other recent presidents – including George W. Bush (72), Bill Clinton (74) and Ronald Reagan (72) – by this point in their tenures.

 

His big accomplishment is violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ?

 

slow clap I guess…
 

[Irv]

What a mess.  

[Steve O]

9 hours ago, Tenhigh said:

Why is this a major accomplishment?  It is just freaking appointees.

 

But I do hope his other appointees weren't as racially and gender biased as his vp and Supreme Court picks. 

According to the article they were "...his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center."

 

Boggles my mind how those that accuse others of racism/sexism etc don't view giving favoritism to people based on their ethnicity/sex as racist/sexist.

[Chef Jim]

11 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Is all about social issues with them. 

There is nothing wrong with social issues.  It’s when you base hiring decisions on race and gender.  I remember a day when that was considered extremely taboo. 

[T master]

20 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Well, good thing Biden is doing such a good job at everything. He's a good president. 

 

That last guy we had sucked so bad. Is he in jail yet? 

 

Yah he's wonderful if you like S**T sandwiches or if your a fan of getting leprosy or maybe the shingles .

 

I guess as they say here in the south if your gonna be dumb you gotta be tough & Tibs your one of the toughest  !

 

 

 

 

[Westside]

2 hours ago, Steve O said:

According to the article they were "...his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center."

 

Boggles my mind how those that accuse others of racism/sexism etc don't view giving favoritism to people based on their ethnicity/sex as racist/sexist.

Racists don’t usually know they’re racist. The left is a prime example, they want to help those they feel are less than them. Making them believe they can’t survive without them.

[T master]

16 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

President Joe Biden has appointed more judges to the federal courts at this stage in his tenure than any president since John F. Kennedy, and his appointees include a record number of women and racial and ethnic minorities, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the Federal Judicial Center.

As of Aug. 8, the first day of the U.S. Senate’s August break, Biden has successfully appointed 75 judges to the three main tiers of the federal judicial system: the district courts, appeals courts and U.S. Supreme Court. That’s far more than the number appointed by Donald Trump (51) and Barack Obama (42) at the same stage in their presidencies, and slightly more than the number appointed by several other recent presidents – including George W. Bush (72), Bill Clinton (74) and Ronald Reagan (72) – by this point in their tenures.

 

 

If they were the absolute best choice for the job it would be one thing but it seemed to be more about pandering to those that have a different agenda rather than the best person for the job .

 

Those actions may rank right up there with Biden having the most executive orders 53 in the first 100 days than any other POTUS to undo laws that were actually working from the previous president just because the president makes decisions doesn't always mean they are the best moves he could make but ones to serve a different reaction .

[nedboy7]

3 hours ago, T master said:

 

If they were the absolute best choice for the job it would be one thing but it seemed to be more about pandering to those that have a different agenda rather than the best person for the job .

 

Those actions may rank right up there with Biden having the most executive orders 53 in the first 100 days than any other POTUS to undo laws that were actually working from the previous president just because the president makes decisions doesn't always mean they are the best moves he could make but ones to serve a different reaction .

 

It is interesting you guys are so triggered by the article stating the diversity in the appointed judges.  You all seem to think that it somehow proves they were not qualified which is not true at all.  You all seem to think it's weird when diversity is stated as a positive in these types of hiring procedures. 

I wonder though did you all freak out when a completely inexperienced woman was appointed to the Supreme Court.  Did that cause you all concern??

 

Amy Coney Barrett Is the Least Experienced Supreme Court Nominee in 30 years....

 

Barrett has spent virtually all of her professional life in academia. Until President Trump nominated her to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017, she had never been a judge, never worked in the government as a prosecutor, defense lawyer, solicitor general, or attorney general, or served as counsel to any legislative body—the usual professional channels that Supreme Court nominees tend to hail from. A graduate of Notre Dame law school, Barrett has almost no experience practicing law whatsoever—a hole in her resume so glaring that during her 7th Circuit confirmation hearing in 2017, Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were dismayed that she couldn’t recall more than three cases she’d worked on during her brief two years in private practice. Nominees are asked to provide details on 10.

Barrett has never tried a case to verdict or argued an appeal in any court, nor has she ever performed any notable pro bono work, even during law school. The ABA’s code of professional responsibility says lawyers should aspire to provide 50 hours a year of free legal services, with an emphasis on serving the poor in recognition of the fact that “only lawyers have the special skills and knowledge needed to secure access to justice for low-income people.” Chief Justice John Roberts famously met some of these requirements by representing a mass murderer on Florida’s death row.

 

Trump has nominated 10 judges that the American Bar Association rated as unqualified to serve on the federal bench; seven of them were confirmed. Among those unqualified nominees was Brett Talley, an amateur ghost-hunter from Alabama who had blogged favorably about the Klan. (He withdrew from consideration.) And then there was Matthew Peterson, an elections lawyer nominated for a seat on the US District Court for the DC Circuit. The ABA rated him as qualified, but he withdrew his nomination shortly after his confirmation hearing, where he couldn’t answer questions from Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) about basic legal concepts.

[T master]

18 hours ago, nedboy7 said:

 

It is interesting you guys are so triggered by the article stating the diversity in the appointed judges.  You all seem to think that it somehow proves they were not qualified which is not true at all.  You all seem to think it's weird when diversity is stated as a positive in these types of hiring procedures. 

I wonder though did you all freak out when a completely inexperienced woman was appointed to the Supreme Court.  Did that cause you all concern??

 

Amy Coney Barrett Is the Least Experienced Supreme Court Nominee in 30 years....

 

Barrett has spent virtually all of her professional life in academia. Until President Trump nominated her to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2017, she had never been a judge, never worked in the government as a prosecutor, defense lawyer, solicitor general, or attorney general, or served as counsel to any legislative body—the usual professional channels that Supreme Court nominees tend to hail from. A graduate of Notre Dame law school, Barrett has almost no experience practicing law whatsoever—a hole in her resume so glaring that during her 7th Circuit confirmation hearing in 2017, Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were dismayed that she couldn’t recall more than three cases she’d worked on during her brief two years in private practice. Nominees are asked to provide details on 10.

Barrett has never tried a case to verdict or argued an appeal in any court, nor has she ever performed any notable pro bono work, even during law school. The ABA’s code of professional responsibility says lawyers should aspire to provide 50 hours a year of free legal services, with an emphasis on serving the poor in recognition of the fact that “only lawyers have the special skills and knowledge needed to secure access to justice for low-income people.” Chief Justice John Roberts famously met some of these requirements by representing a mass murderer on Florida’s death row.

 

Trump has nominated 10 judges that the American Bar Association rated as unqualified to serve on the federal bench; seven of them were confirmed. Among those unqualified nominees was Brett Talley, an amateur ghost-hunter from Alabama who had blogged favorably about the Klan. (He withdrew from consideration.) And then there was Matthew Peterson, an elections lawyer nominated for a seat on the US District Court for the DC Circuit. The ABA rated him as qualified, but he withdrew his nomination shortly after his confirmation hearing, where he couldn’t answer questions from Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) about basic legal concepts.

 

Well if they make it past the vetting process & those doing that process allow them to go through then who's fault is that ? It's not the person that nominated them it's those that allowed them to go through the process finding that they weren't qualified but still allowed them to be .

 

All's i was saying is that if by chance your motivations behind your actions are not in a way that it is to put the right person in the job and to look as if you are trying to do the right thing when in reality the only thing you care about is the perception of what you are doing in another eye then that is wrong .

 

That's why there is a system of checks and balances & again if they go through the process & are checked then the blame lies in someone else's lap not the one that nominated those people but that's the way it is perceived to be & the biggest reason is because of the person that did the nominating .

 

In reading your reply i don't follow those nominations as closely asa you that is apparent but if those folks don't belong then don't let them get through & look until you find someone no matter their race or ethnicity that is the right person qualified to do the job ...

 

I just feel with Biden his motivations in most places aren't what they seem to be on the surface because he is a swamp creature & a huge part of the American problem IMHO those that are career politicians i have no faith in any way that they have the peoples best interest at heart .

 

 

Edited September 14, 2022 by T master