aristocrat Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 11 hours ago, BillStime said: That guy has ZERO business being there - none. Those Americans have every right to their health care. It is also against the law. So as I understand he is allowed to be there but he cannot interfere with her getting treated. Did he? By offering counselling and not touching her? Did the 72 year old attacking him cause her to be interfered with here? Now we have all these protesters that block intersections right? Was big with the BLM protesters and someone would eventually get run over. Do we make it illegal to block the roads? Can't have it both ways remember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 Just now, aristocrat said: So as I understand he is allowed to be there but he cannot interfere with her getting treated. Did he? By offering counselling and not touching her? Did the 72 year old attacking him cause her to be interfered with here? Now we have all these protesters that block intersections right? Was big with the BLM protesters and someone would eventually get run over. Do we make it illegal to block the roads? Can't have it both ways remember Two wrongs don't make a right... The 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act prohibits intentional property damage and the use of “force or threat of force or … physical obstruction” to “injure, intimidate or interfere with” someone entering an abortion clinic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, BillStime said: Two wrongs don't make a right... The 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act prohibits intentional property damage and the use of “force or threat of force or … physical obstruction” to “injure, intimidate or interfere with” someone entering an abortion clinic. So they are there all time right? He likely knows the laws. He can be there just cannot interfere. Now we have only heard about the 72 year old man who went after the kid. This man was unable to criminally charge the pastor and also lost the civil suit. We have no info if the female was actually interfered with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 1 minute ago, aristocrat said: So they are there all time right? He likely knows the laws. He can be there just cannot interfere. Now we have only heard about the 72 year old man who went after the kid. This man was unable to criminally charge the pastor and also lost the civil suit. We have no info if the female was actually interfered with. "Now we have only heard about the 72 year old man who went after the kid"... too much he said-she said. Where is the video evidence? Bottom line: this guy has ZERO reason to be there; esp with his 12 year old son... This incident likely did more damage to his son than the parents who allegedly bring their kids to a drag show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 27, 2022 Author Share Posted September 27, 2022 You don't say? It's just so hard to imagine that the FBI and DOJ would ever be involved in such police state activities.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 1 minute ago, BillStime said: "Now we have only heard about the 72 year old man who went after the kid"... too much he said-she said. Where is the video evidence? Bottom line: this guy has ZERO reason to be there; esp with his 12 year old son... This incident likely did more damage to his son than the parents who allegedly bring their kids to a drag show. the 72 year old lost the civil suit. Civil suits are easier to win than criminal cases. If he couldn’t win that he was at fault. The kid was probably traumatized by being attacked by an old man. If he hasn’t been attacked no trauma right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, aristocrat said: the 72 year old lost the civil suit. Civil suits are easier to win than criminal cases. If he couldn’t win that he was at fault. The kid was probably traumatized by being attacked by an old man. If he hasn’t been attacked no trauma right? The old man never showed up to his civil suit... prob not worth the stress. But yea, let's not focus on THIS guy: “Mr. Houck, who often carries a large knife on his belt, poses a threat to the safety of those seeking entrance to our facilities,” she said. “Violence and obstruction of clinic entrances is unacceptable and illegal. It’s good to see justice served.” This guy has a history of terrorizing innocent people - he is no saint. Have you done ANY research on him? Any? A US magistrate and a grand jury reviewed sworn testimony and issued a warrant for his arrest. He will have a jury trial. What is your objection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 12 hours ago, BillStime said: That guy has ZERO business being there - none. Those Americans have every right to their health care. It is also against the law. And so is protesting in front of a Justice's personal residence. Come on Billsy....if you want to start this sort of thing, you have to be ready for some blowback. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 Just now, SoCal Deek said: And so is protesting in front of a Justice's personal residence. Come on Billsy....if you want to start this sort of thing, you have to be ready for some blowback. I already said TWO wrongs don't make a right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 1 minute ago, BillStime said: I already said TWO wrongs don't make a right... Thank You! Now let's see you start one of your many Threads chastising those protestors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 9 minutes ago, BillStime said: The old man never showed up to his civil suit... prob not worth the stress. But yea, let's not focus on THIS guy: “Mr. Houck, who often carries a large knife on his belt, poses a threat to the safety of those seeking entrance to our facilities,” she said. “Violence and obstruction of clinic entrances is unacceptable and illegal. It’s good to see justice served.” This guy has a history of terrorizing innocent people - he is no saint. Have you done ANY research on him? Any? A US magistrate and a grand jury reviewed sworn testimony and issued a warrant for his arrest. He will have a jury trial. What is your objection? As long as he's there peacefully and not interfering and acting legally I have no issue with him being there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 27, 2022 Author Share Posted September 27, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 5 hours ago, aristocrat said: As long as he's there peacefully and not interfering and acting legally I have no issue with him being there. Personally, I think protesting and debating with women on the way into a clinic for services--including abortion--is wrong. One has no way of knowing the specifics that brought her there, the pressure she is under, the emotions she is dealing with. I think this debate needs to happen on a higher level. I also think towing your adolescent children along is wrong, too, perhaps at times on the order of encouraging gender confusion for one's young children. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 28, 2022 Share Posted September 28, 2022 How corrupt is the FBI? https://www.thenewneo.com/2022/09/26/how-corrupt-is-the-fbi/ . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 28, 2022 Share Posted September 28, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 29, 2022 Share Posted September 29, 2022 The truth continues to come out. 30 ex-FBI agents stand up to support whistleblower who exposed agency’s political bias by Miranda Devine Thirty former FBI agents, including a retired deputy assistant director, head of counterterrorism and five SWAT team members, have spoken out publicly in support of suspended FBI whistleblower Stephen Friend. Their heartfelt messages, obtained exclusively by The Post, show a deep and widespread anguish about the politicization of the FBI. “It’s time to stop the FBI from being the enforcer of a political party’s ideology,” says Ernie Tibaldi, a retired agent from San Francisco. “We need to reestablish the FBI as the apolitical and independent law enforcement entity that it always was.” https://nypost.com/2022/09/28/30-ex-fbi-agents-stand-up-to-support-whistleblower-who-exposed-agencys-political-bias/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 29, 2022 Author Share Posted September 29, 2022 All whistle-blowers must be heard and believed!! (only when out to get the orange man though) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 29, 2022 Author Share Posted September 29, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 29, 2022 Share Posted September 29, 2022 You read about the story last week of how between 20-30 armed FBI agents showed up early on the morning of September 23 at Catholic activist Mark Houck’s home, pounding relentlessly against the door until he opened it, flashing semi-automatic weapons at his wife and seven children, then taking him away—handcuffed with a belly-chain—while his terrorized, screaming family cried in the background. His crime? He allegedly shoved a man who was verbally abusing his 12-year-old son and getting up into his face. What in the world is going on here? We all know that you can throw someone in front of a moving subway car in NYC and be back out on the streets by lunchtime, so why bring down the full power of the federal government on this guy? Just the other day, a drunken man drove over and killed an 18-year-old because he thought he might be a MAGA Republican. Was this man surrounded by heavily-armed Merrick Garland troops and hauled away, shackled and humiliated? No, he was let out after just a few days. The 47-year-old Houck is the Co-Founder & President of The King’s Men, a pro-Catholic, pro-masculinity advocacy group. He pleaded not guilty Tuesday to federal charges of violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act. The lunacy on display here is mind-boggling: A) local officials and the Philadelphia district attorney declined to press charges last October when the encounter took place. Why? Because there wasn’t enough evidence of a crime. B) When Houck found out the Department of Justice was investigating, he offered to turn himself in. The DOJ however, declined that option and decided a full military assault was the better way to go. C) The charges are obviously bogus and trumped up. It is an unbelievable stretch to imagine that Mark Houck was deliberately preventing someone from obtaining an abortion when he was simply protecting his son from an unhinged protester. He now faces up to 11 years in prison, if you can believe it. It is once again, sadly, another example of the wholesale politicization and militarization of our Department of Justice. To me, what’s so terrifying about this incident is that Houck has no ties to Q-Anon, has no criminal record, had nothing to do with Jan. 6, and is not a known Trump associate—he’s just a guy. Meaning that Attorney Merrick Garland is now using the awesome powers of the federal government to go after regular American citizens for the crime of not agreeing with Joe Biden. If you’re not worried by now, you’re not paying attention. https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2022/09/29/new-details-of-outrageous-fbi-raid-on-catholic-activist-mark-houck-shock-the-conscience-n634905 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 30, 2022 Author Share Posted September 30, 2022 The FBI won't return surveillance video of a FIREBOMBING because that video might inspire right wing violence. The FBI isn't out of control at all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 Court orders production of Seth Rich laptop Today, a federal judge ordered the FBI to “produce the information it possesses related to Seth Rich’s laptop.” This case involves a multi-year fight by attorney Ty Clevenger to obtain records relating to the FBI/DOJ investigation of Seth Rich, particularly whether Rich was involved in the hack of the DNC or had communicated with Wikileaks. This fight dates back to 2017 and includes two FOIA lawsuit. In the first lawsuit, the FBI produced no responsive documents. The parties knew the FBI had something, and so this sparked a second lawsuit – where the FBI somehow found 20,000 pages of potentially responsive documents. https://technofog.substack.com/p/court-orders-production-of-seth-rich?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=274771&post_id=75612581&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 30, 2022 Author Share Posted September 30, 2022 All whistle-blowers blowers should be heard and believed! Strike that, this is 2022 and all whistle-blowers must be destroyed. Now our resident ***** stains like @Tiberius @BillStime and @716er will defend this staggering hypocrisy like they do with all the other examples of leftist lunacy. Some of you will actually engage with them on it. My question, as always, is why? I implore those of you who choose to engage with these brain dead aholez to give the following a try instead...even if only once...then put them on ignore. Hey @BillStime @Tiberius @716er..... ***** OFF!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 @B-Man thought you were a better person than that. Agreeing with the constant harassment from that poster is gross. I wish you well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 30, 2022 Share Posted September 30, 2022 4 hours ago, 716er said: @B-Man thought you were a better person than that. Agreeing with the constant harassment from that poster is gross. I wish you well. I understand that you are primarily concerned with the remark directed towards you at the end of the post. I am more concerned with the FBI, rogue agency theme of this thread and I agree with the whistleblower comment by DR'sGhost and the Miranda Devine tweet. I wish you well also. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted October 2, 2022 Share Posted October 2, 2022 (edited) https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/peter-strzok-termination-letter-released-and-its-awesome/ bye bye 'peter' Edited October 2, 2022 by Albwan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 2, 2022 Share Posted October 2, 2022 Reminder: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted October 4, 2022 Author Share Posted October 4, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted October 4, 2022 Author Share Posted October 4, 2022 Clown. Show. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 LOCK HER UP Meanwhile: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 So another bust? Shocker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 OF COURSE THEY DO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted October 4, 2022 Author Share Posted October 4, 2022 Keep in mind that Miranda Devine is the one who broke the ABSOLUTELY TRUE Hunter Biden laptop story that was censored and discredited with the Russian disinformation BS tactic that the IC/media keeps getting leftists to fall for. So yeah, she has more credibility than almost any other "journalist" these days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 https://apnews.com/article/3447b4f291761273034ca125d703887f Quote The five specific counts in the indictment don’t charge Danchenko with lying about his sourcing for the sex allegations. Still, prosecutors wanted to present testimony at trial that they said would have shown that Danchenko lied about his sourcing for those allegations just as he lied about other aspects of his sourcing, Danchenko’s lawyers objected. They say the testimony would be highly prejudicial and would confuse the jury. In a ruling issued Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga agreed with the defense. Specifically, he said the testimony that the government planned to introduce wouldn’t actually prove Danchenko lied. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted October 5, 2022 Author Share Posted October 5, 2022 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted October 6, 2022 Author Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 7 minutes ago, DRsGhost said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 11th Circuit Court Expedites DOJ’s Appeal of Special Master Appointed to Review Trump Documents The 11th Circuit Court will expedite the DOJ’s appeal of a special master appointed to review documents seized at Mar-A-Lago: Appellant’s “Motion to Expedite Appeal” is granted. The Court directs the Clerk to expedite the appeal for merits disposition purposes. Having consulted with the Chief Judge, the appeal will be assigned to a special merits panel from the classified appeals log randomly selected by the Clerk. That panel will decide when and how to hear oral argument. https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/10/11th-circuit-court-expedites-dojs-appeal-of-special-master-appointed-to-review-trump-documents/ https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000183-a919-d581-a98f-a9dd618a0000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 Can a Republican Majority Rein In the Lawless DOJ? “The party has an annoying history of talking a big game when it’s in the minority, then just behaving like grandstanding bureaucrats once it’s back in the majority.” https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2022/10/06/the-morning-briefing-can-a-republican-majority-rein-in-the-lawless-doj-n1635064 I agree. It's going to take everyone to push back. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts