Jump to content

NFL Draft Rumors


HappyDays

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Beane’s comments on what he would draft in a RD1 RB described Breece Hall. 
 

He has home run speed, but isn’t a blur.. You don’t run a 4.39 and have people worry if you can house it or get the corner.   
 

Id admit he doesn’t look like a 4.39 guy on tape, but I think his body type could have something to do with that at 6’1. 
 

What he shows on tape is a decisive cutback ability and elite receiving traits.  
 

Wheel routes, dump offs, slot.. he can do that all at a high level. 

I don't think he will be that effective in the pros. I just don't see elite skills on tape which transfers to the NFL. I think he is serviceable but not the answer for Buffalo. Think good Oline and Allen's arm and legs. That's what the Bills offense is all about. It certainly won't be about Hall if he's drafted at 25. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, IronMaidenBills said:

I’m not keen in playing against the Bills strength, but I want to enhance the passing game by having a RB teams have to plan around. If we have a Derick Henry, teams will be forced to put 8 in the box, even with Josh throwing, they wouldn’t have a choice. If they don’t, they will get anaconda’d to death. 


 

No they won’t- it is pretty simple.  Teams would rather force the Bills to play a long drive and run the ball and see if we would stick with the run.

 

It is the dumbest of arguments because the only way a RB changes the defense is to make them the focal point and that is taking the ball away from our best player.

 

That was the same argument KC made and no one cared about the RB - it just doesn’t matter.  Points come from passing.

 

 

  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, newcam2012 said:

I don't think he will be that effective in the pros. I just don't see elite skills on tape which transfers to the NFL. I think he is serviceable but not the answer for Buffalo. Think good Oline and Allen's arm and legs. That's what the Bills offense is all about. It certainly won't be about Hall if he's drafted at 25. 


I don’t disagree with you on taking Hall at 25.. I’m ok with it but don’t love it.

 

That said, we NEED to get away from any dependence upon “Allen’s legs” during the regular season.  Playoffs, fair game, unleash him.  If they think Breece Hall and a better OL does that, I’m fine with it.  
 

Im certainly higher on it than taking a non-Sauce/Stingley corner or a linebacker that may barely play this year. 

1 minute ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

No they won’t- it is pretty simple.  Teams would rather force the Bills to play a long drive and run the ball and see if we would stick with the run.

 

It is the dumbest of arguments because the only way a RB changes the defense is to make them the focal point and that is taking the ball away from our best player.

 

That was the same argument KC made and no one cared about the RB - it just doesn’t matter.  Points come from passing.

 

 


Fwiw.. and I hate that I keep defending Hall at 25, but they’d be drafting him as the 2-deep destroyer… much of which means he’s a passing threat underneath. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SCBills said:


I don’t disagree with you on taking Hall at 25.. I’m ok with it but don’t love it.

 

That said, we NEED to get away from any dependence upon “Allen’s legs” during the regular season.  Playoffs, fair game, unleash him.  If they think Breece Hall and a better OL does that, I’m fine with it.  
 

Im certainly higher on it than taking a non-Sauce/Stingley corner or a linebacker that may barely play this year. 


Fwiw.. and I hate that I keep defending Hall at 25, but they’d be drafting him as the 2-deep destroyer… much of which means he’s a passing threat underneath. 


 

I totally get that - the argument was that teams will have to put 8 in the box to stop the run.  That is not happening.

 

I also think he will be more fluid than Singletary as a receiver, but my guess is teams will continue to attack us as they have the Chiefs - back to front.  Take away deep, double cover Diggs, and if we flip it short to a RB - rally to the tackle.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

No they won’t- it is pretty simple.  Teams would rather force the Bills to play a long drive and run the ball and see if we would stick with the run.

 

It is the dumbest of arguments because the only way a RB changes the defense is to make them the focal point and that is taking the ball away from our best player.

 

That was the same argument KC made and no one cared about the RB - it just doesn’t matter.  Points come from passing.

 

 

So you’re saying KC didn’t bounce the Bills via the running game prior year? Even last year I seem to recall a few teams running the ball right down their throat and #17 couldn’t do enough to overcome the lack of clock or defense. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

I totally get that - the argument was that teams will have to put 8 in the box to stop the run.  That is not happening.

 

I also think he will be more fluid than Singletary as a receiver, but my guess is teams will continue to attack us as they have the Chiefs - back to front.  Take away deep, double cover Diggs, and if we flip it short to a RB - rally to the tackle.  
 

 

That's why a dynamic speed burner receiver is a great asset for this offense. There are a few in this draft

 I'd rather go this route than the Hall route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

No they won’t- it is pretty simple.  Teams would rather force the Bills to play a long drive and run the ball and see if we would stick with the run.

 

It is the dumbest of arguments because the only way a RB changes the defense is to make them the focal point and that is taking the ball away from our best player.

 

That was the same argument KC made and no one cared about the RB - it just doesn’t matter.  Points come from passing.

 

 

This is just wrong in so many ways. Hall is the best receiving back in the draft and can help in more ways than running the ball. He would take carries away from Allen and that would benefit his longevity. And you need a reliable back the last few drives to chew clock. Allen can still be the dynamic passer he is with an elite running back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, WyoAZBillfan said:

So you’re saying KC didn’t bounce the Bills via the running game prior year? Even last year I seem to recall a few teams running the ball right down their throat and #17 couldn’t do enough to overcome the lack of clock or defense. 


 

I am saying at no time did the Bills shift to 8 in the box to fully stop the run.  Yes you can lose to a team running the ball, but are you more afraid of the Bills trying to beat you by running Breece Hall 40 times or Josh Allen?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

I am saying at no time did the Bills shift to 8 in the box to fully stop the run.  Yes you can lose to a team running the ball, but are you more afraid of the Bills trying to beat you by running Breece Hall 40 times or Josh Allen?

 

 

40 times?!!  Haha…wow, just stop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

I am saying at no time did the Bills shift to 8 in the box to fully stop the run.  Yes you can lose to a team running the ball, but are you more afraid of the Bills trying to beat you by running Breece Hall 40 times or Josh Allen?

 

 

I’d say the more teams have to defend, the better off you are, see Jacksonville game 2021. 5 games, 2 opponents the Bills has no answer. When Titan QB1 looks all pro, that’s a problem

Edited by WyoAZBillfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, whorlnut said:

This is just wrong in so many ways. Hall is the best receiving back in the draft and can help in more ways than running the ball. He would take carries away from Allen and that would benefit his longevity. And you need a reliable back the last few drives to chew clock. Allen can still be the dynamic passer he is with an elite running back. 


 

That assumes he has better stats than 95% of the NFL running backs because that is where Singletary was.

 

You also rush Hall versus Allen - you are going to average 3-4 yards less per carry than Allen was doing.

 

I get the idea - it just has proven to be false for the most part in the NFL since the 2000’s.  
 

The top RBs in the league don’t win championships.  
 

People complain about Edmunds (a 2x pro bowler) drafted in the first, but think that a RB is the missing piece on the top offense in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rochesterfan said:


 

That assumes he has better stats than 95% of the NFL running backs because that is where Singletary was.

 

You also rush Hall versus Allen - you are going to average 3-4 yards less per carry than Allen was doing.

 

I get the idea - it just has proven to be false for the most part in the NFL since the 2000’s.  
 

The top RBs in the league don’t win championships.  
 

People complain about Edmunds (a 2x pro bowler) drafted in the first, but think that a RB is the missing piece on the top offense in the NFL.

Top offense?  I wasn’t aware of that. Please share that confirmation. Maybe you mean top “defense”. I can show you actual rankings to support that claim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WyoAZBillfan said:

I’d say the more teams have to defend, the better off you are, see Jacksonville game 2021. 5 games, 2 opponents the Bills has no answer. When Titan QB1 looks all pro, that’s a problem


 

And you know what happened when Henry was hurt - the Titans ran the ball nearly exactly the same with 3rd and 4th back-ups.  
 

Was it the o-line or Henry that drives the Titans running game. 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rochesterfan said:


 

And you know what happened when Henry was hurt - the Titans ran the ball nearly exactly the same with 3rd and 4th back-ups.  
 

Was it the o-line or Henry that drives the Titans running game. 
 

 

I wouldn’t argue that point at all. Big fan of O-line. Curious (may have beer brain) what was their record without Henry those games AND how much more did QB1 have to “produce”?

 I’d be more than happy with stud online picks and later round bruiser in the draft, both will extend #17’s career and win games. Blow out games are great, but I imagine a super bowl win is sweeter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, whorlnut said:

Top offense?  I wasn’t aware of that. Please share that confirmation. Maybe you mean top “defense”. I can show you actual rankings to support that claim. 


 

Yes - top 5 in scoring, top 5 in rushing yards, top 5 in rushing average per carry, Top 10 in passing yards, top 10 in TD passes, top 10 in rushing TDs, etc.

 

They were one of the top offenses all year and that included multiple games with really bad weather.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gobills404 said:

This thread is 10 pages long and there’s been like 5 actual rumors posted lol


I’d be fine if they took Gordon at 25. I think he’s going to have a better NFL career than McDuffie, Booth and Elam.

Edited by Motor26
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:


 

Yes - top 5 in scoring, top 5 in rushing yards, top 5 in rushing average per carry, Top 10 in passing yards, top 10 in TD passes, top 10 in rushing TDs, etc.

 

They were one of the top offenses all year and that included multiple games with really bad weather.

 

 

You literally claimed it was the “best”. Now you are backtracking. Be careful how you word your posts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://walterfootball.com/nflhotpress/article/2022-NFL-Draft-Week-Rumors-Wednesday

 

Quote

From speaking with sources, the Jets are very high on Cincinnati cornerback Ahmad 'Sauce' Gardner, and it sounds like he is the favorite to be their selection at No. 4. Some in the front office prefer Stingley because they note Stingley went against top competition and played well, while Gardner dominated a lesser conference without being challenged by top receiving prospects. Jets head coach Robert Saleh, however, is said to be set on Garnder as his guy and loves the way Gardner fits in the defensive scheme. By the sounds of it from speaking with team sources, Gardner could easily land with the Jets in the 2022 NFL Draft. LSU cornerback Derek Stingley, meanwhile, is prime target for the Giants in the 2022 NFL Draft.

 

Quote

Stingley is projected to go in the teens in many mock drafts, but team sources would be shocked if Stingley was not a top-10 pick. While Stingley was a 1-year wonder with two injury-plagued campaigns, he is viewed as a freak athlete with the natural cover skills to become one of the best cornerbacks in the NFL. Both New York teams are high on Stingley ,according to multiple team sources. Both New York squads hold two top-10 picks, so Stingley could easily end up starting out his pro career in the Big Apple.

 

Quote

Along with Stingley, the Giants are high on Cincinnati cornerback Ahmad 'Sauce' Gardner, Alabama offensive tackle Evan Neal and Mississippi State offensive tackle Charles Cross. The Giants have a good shot to land two of those four players. They expect Gardner to be off the board quickly, so they may not have a shot at him. New York also could get to pick No. 5 and have Stingley as well as all three top-10 offensive linemen - Neal, Cross, and Ikem Ekwonu available. In that case, the Giants might take Stingley at No. 5 because they would be assured of getting one of the blockers they like at No. 7. If the Giants take a lineman with the fifth pick, the Panthers could trade the No. 6 with a team that is looking to land Stingley. Other teams that are said to be interested in selecting Stingley include the Seahawks and Vikings. Hence, the Giants might avoid taking that risk by snatching up Stingley at No. 5 and seeing which offensive lineman is there at No. 7.

 

Quote

Another possibility the Giants have to consider is Gardner and Stingley going off the board at with picks Nos. 3 and 4 to the Texans and Jets. That might be less likely to happen, but it is possible. If that happened, the Giants could have Oregon edge rusher Kayvon Thibodeaux in play as a backup option. The question with Thibodeaux is if the new Giants regime is comfortable dealing with his football character.

 

Quote

Sources say the Jets would like to add a wide receiver with the tenth pick of the 2022 NFL Draft to provide a weapon for second-year quarterback Zach Wilson. The Jets like USC wide receiver Drake London a lot, but they already have a couple of big receivers in Corey Davis and Denzel Mims. They also have shifty slot receivers in Elijah Moore and Braxton Berrios. What they don't have is a deep-speed big-play weapon, and they have some real options to fill that void at pick No. 10 with players like Ohio State's Garrett Wilson, Alabama's Jameson Williams and Ohio State's Chris Olave.

 

It sounds like Wilson could be the favorite of those three. He had a consensus higher grade than Olave, and Williams could miss a large portion of his rookie season as he recovers from his torn ACL. With the seat starting to heat up under general manager Joe Douglas, the Jets are more in need of instant contributors to help Zach Wilson, and Garrett Wilson's deep speed could change up the offense immediately. The Jets also could go a different direction if a surprising player slips to No. 10, but from speaking with sources, it sounds like the Jets are targeting receiver help and have Wilson as the a top candidate.

 

All of this info makes me more hopeful that Jameson Williams will drop out of the top 10 and into a range where Beane would feel comfortable trading up for him. Atlanta is the wildcard, no one seems to have any clue what they're going to do and they have so many needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...