Jump to content

Voter fraud!


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Anyone paying attention knows the answer….
 

generally only the lowest functioning most apathetic members of society don’t have IDs. Democrats have a better ground game to harvest these votes and republicans know it. 
 

I saw a study somewhere that if only taxpayers voted, Mitt Romney would have beaten Obama 4 to 1, and we know Obama win in a blowout. 

 

It’s a terrible flaw in the American system that sloths that contribute nothing to society and mooch off of others have the same voice as those working their tails off contributing a quarter of their earnings or more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Anyone paying attention knows the answer….
 

generally only the lowest functioning most apathetic members of society don’t have IDs. Democrats have a better ground game to harvest these votes and republicans know it. 
 

I saw a study somewhere that if only taxpayers voted, Mitt Romney would have beaten Obama 4 to 1, and we know Obama win in a blowout. 

 

It’s a terrible flaw in the American system that sloths that contribute nothing to society and mooch off of others have the same voice as those working their tails off contributing a quarter of their earnings or more. 

 

You need ID to do any number of things in life.  Not wanting ID to be shown at voting booths is so that they can get others to vote for people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

You need ID to do any number of things in life.  Not wanting ID to be shown at voting booths is so that they can get others to vote for people.

 

That doesn’t wash. If it was just about faking votes both parties would do it. This has way more to do with the pulling a bus up to a homeless shelter and offering free lunch for votes, and those votes go to the party of entitlements.
 

Republicans don’t want people that are too lazy or irresponsible to get IDs voting, they know those are the democrat’s entitlement base. 

Edited by Over 29 years of fanhood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

That doesn’t wash. If it was just about faking votes both parties would do it. This has way more to do with the pulling a bus up to a homeless shelter and offering free lunch for votes, and those votes go to the party of entitlements.
 

Republicans don’t want people that are too lazy or irresponsible to get IDs voting, they know those are the democrat’s entitlement base. 

 

The Repubs could do the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something tells me that in two short years we will go from having "the most secure election in US history" to being able to question election integrity again without being called a conspiracy theorist. 

 

That is if the GOP takes back congress as the polls suggest they will. 

 

if that somehow doesn't happen?  Well then it will be the most secure election in US history again!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

Something tells me that in two short years we will go from having "the most secure election in US history" to being able to question election integrity again without being called a conspiracy theorist. 

 

That is if the GOP takes back congress as the polls suggest they will. 

 

if that somehow doesn't happen?  Well then it will be the most secure election in US history again!

 

 

 

BREAKING NEWS

 

 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For it before they were against it or against it before they were for it?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html

 

Before reading the quote below consider that in 2020 67 million of the 159 million votes cast were by mail in ballot.  

 

Most secure election in US History though!!!!

 

:lol::lol::lol:

 

Voting by mail is now common enough and problematic enough that election experts say there have been multiple elections in which no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner. The list includes the 2000 presidential election, in which problems with absentee ballots in Florida were a little-noticed footnote to other issues.

In the last presidential election, 35.5 million voters requested absentee ballots, but only 27.9 million absentee votes were counted, according to a study by Charles Stewart III, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

For it before they were against it or against it before they were for it?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html

 

Before reading the quote below consider that in 2020 67 million of the 159 million votes cast were by mail in ballot.  

 

Most secure election in US History though!!!!

 

:lol::lol::lol:

 

Voting by mail is now common enough and problematic enough that election experts say there have been multiple elections in which no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner. The list includes the 2000 presidential election, in which problems with absentee ballots in Florida were a little-noticed footnote to other issues.

In the last presidential election, 35.5 million voters requested absentee ballots, but only 27.9 million absentee votes were counted, according to a study by Charles Stewart III, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the 2000 election prestigious institutions in academia weighed in with studies....

 

What was among their recommendations at the time?

 

Integrity of absentee balloting is a real concern. We recommend use of early voting instead of absentee voting on demand. (Pages 36-41)

 

A real concern after an election the GOP wins, but not in an election where 40 percent of the ballots were mail in?  Got it.

 

https://news.mit.edu/2001/voting2facts

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And finally we have the granddaddy of them all.  The 2005 Commission on Federal Election Reform.  Chaired by former President Carter and former SoS James Baker.

 

Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” That quote isn’t from President Trump, who criticized mail-in voting this week after Wisconsin Democrats tried and failed to change an election at the last minute into an exclusively mail-in affair. It’s the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker III.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/heed-jimmy-carter-on-the-danger-of-mail-in-voting-11586557667

 

But 2020 was most secure election in US History, right?

 

During an election where 42% of the ballots cast were mail in ballots. Far and away the greatest proportion of ballots cast by mail in US History. The exact type of voting that democrats and other left wing outlets had previously warned us were the biggest potential sources of fraud.

 

And poof, magically overnight those parameters become the parameters for the most secure election in US History. ^_^

 

That's how I know you morons have been had.

 

 

Edited by DRsGhost
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

They said his signature didn't match.

 

I am almost glad as it helps demonstrate the absurdity of those who are able to vote in person using an absentee ballot.

 

(yes, I am aware that he was one of the GOP candidates)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

They said his signature didn't match.

 

I am almost glad as it helps demonstrate the absurdity of those who are able to vote in person using an absentee ballot.

 

(yes, I am aware that he was one of the GOP candidates)

 

 

 

Remember PA got rid of signature matching of mail in ballots in 2020.  Via the court.

 

But remember....setting the bar even lower in regard to how we handle mail in ballots = most secure election in US history!

 

https://www.newsweek.com/pennsylvania-supreme-court-unanimously-rules-that-mail-ballots-cannot-rejected-due-signature-1541773

 

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling on Friday that prohibits counties from rejecting mail-in ballots in which the voter's signature doesn't match their voter registration.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Angry 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Remember PA got rid of signature matching of mail in ballots in 2020.  Via the court.

 

But remember....setting the bar even lower in regard to how we handle mail in ballots = most secure election in US history!

 

https://www.newsweek.com/pennsylvania-supreme-court-unanimously-rules-that-mail-ballots-cannot-rejected-due-signature-1541773

 

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling on Friday that prohibits counties from rejecting mail-in ballots in which the voter's signature doesn't match their voter registration.


Remember 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Harris County Really Doesn’t Want Vote Audits

 

The possibility of having votes audited sent Harris County’s Democratic executives into a preemptive panic.

 

Harris County Commissioners Court voted 3 to 2 along party lines this week to mount a legal challenge to a state-planned audit of county-run elections over the past two years.

“There’s no reason for a politicized and politically motivated election audit especially after democracy nearly crumbled over this pandering,” said County Judge Lina Hidalgo, who equated the audit to the January 6 riot in Washington D.C.

 

“Politicized and politically motivated” means “we can’t let Republicans catch us cheating.” Remember, this is the county where the voting administrator had to resign over a horribly botched March primary this year.

 

https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=52225

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It Happened Again: Cherokee County, Kansas Election Results Reversed After “Vote Flip” Discovered

by Brian Lupo

 

 

Nothing to see here, folks. Just a human error, technical glitch, or “we caught it in time”.

 

Those are the excuses we hear every single time.    Every time.

 

Antrim County, Dekalb County, Williamson County, Windham, NH. The list goes on and on and on of jurisdictions that have some “human error” or “technical glitch” that causes votes to flip, change or swap.

 

Enter our latest example: Cherokee County, Kansas. Not to be confused with Cherokee County, GA that recently went against the will of their constituents by refusing to conduct a hand recount and sided with highly questionable legal guidance from a conflicted attorney who used to work for the Secretary of States Office that is being called into question.

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/happened-cherokee-county-kansas-election-results-reversed-vote-flip-discovered/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And with this story it's worth reminding folks that voter signature verification rules were blatantly ignored and/or abolished in several states in 2020.

 

But sure no evidence of fraud and most secure election in US history.

 

You've. Been. Had.

 

 

  • Shocked 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Reminder:

 

Fact Checking the Fact Checkers: AP's Hit Piece on '2000 Mules' is Full of Holes

By Jennifer Van Laar 

 

Many of us were alarmed on Election Night 2020 when, while the results were looking good for Donald Trump, multiple states suddenly stopped counting votes. As the night wore on and went into the next day, it seemed that every update was favorable for Biden until he was ultimately named President-Elect.

 

https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2022/05/10/fact-checking-the-fact-checkers-2000-mules-n561941

 

 

 

 

.

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DRsGhost said:

Keep up "The Big Lie" and "the most secure election in US history" messaging.

 

It's working great!

 

 

 


You haven’t leaned your lesson from the last time you posted schitt from Rasmussen?

 

You really think you’re changing any minds?

 

lolz

Edited by BillStime
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Barack Obama Hosting Martha’s Vineyard Fundraiser for Eric Holder’s Army of Election Workers

by Charlie Spiering

 

Former President Barack Obama will host a fundraiser for his former Attorney General Eric Holder’s redistricting committee on August 30th, in a major step forward for Democrats in the midterms. The fundraiser for Holder’s National Democratic Redistricting Committee will feature a dinner and a discussion about democracy, supporting legal efforts to help Democrats in the 2022 midterm elections, according to Politico’s Playbook.

 

(Snip)

 

Holder spoke about his group’s midterm efforts in a recent interview with Sirius/XM host Joe Madison. He spoke about a pressing need to draft a group of polling workers in every state to combat Republicans and that his group was focusing on the problem.

 

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/22/barack-obama-hosting-marthas-vineyard-fundraiser-eric-holders-army-election-workers/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

VOTE BY MAIL, THEY SAID. IT’S SAFE, THEY SAID. THEY EVEN GOT NEWMAN FROM SEINFELD TO ENDORSE IT. (NO, REALLY, THEY DID). 

 

Baltimore post office discovers 2020 mail-in ballots. 

 

“We deeply regret the late delivery of these mail pieces.”

 

 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/baltimore-post-office-discovers-2020-mail-ballots

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...