Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:23 AM, LeGOATski said: Would you say the government is doing the oppressing? If yes, then it is anti-government Like William Wallace's famous scream at the end of Braveheart š Expand William Wallace screamed freedom in the face of oppression. No Scottish person believed the English when they later referred to it as āan anti-government displayā. Cmon far left. Actual fascists are out thereā¦.
LeGOATski Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:20 AM, Frat-Train said: Same as when the Jews shouted freedom to the Nazis, right? Or when Taiwan shouts freedom to China? Ignorance is truly bliss. But letās be realā¦. Youāre not here to be politically accurate. Youāre here because you have hatred to give to those who donāt agree with you. BTW, Not a fan of Cruz, considering Iām a Democrat. Iām proof that moderates are the last line of defense before the far left (you) allows the country to be destroyed. Context is reading the same rhetoric in all left-leaning headlines, referring to a challenge to an oppressive communist government, simply as āAnti-government ā. Itās the same way they refer to whatās happening in Asia. But yea, ignorance is bliss and you should continue to focus on the semantics. Expand You seem to be doing loops around the term "anti-government" Talk about semantics...
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, 716er said: From the perspective of those governments, cries of freedom from the people subjected to their regimes were anti-government. Expand Wowā¦. Stupidity is the main attraction at this zoo. Noted.
716er Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, LeGOATski said: You seem to be doing loops around the term "anti-government" Expand Like I said On 7/12/2021 at 1:12 AM, 716er said: Disingenuous douchebaggery does go far here, though. Expand
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, LeGOATski said: You seem to be doing loops around the term "anti-government" Talk about semantics... Expand Iām doing loops around your reasoning. Nothing more.
LeGOATski Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, Frat-Train said: William Wallace screamed freedom in the face of oppression. No Scottish person believed the English when they later referred to it as āan anti-government displayā. Cmon far left. Actual fascists are out thereā¦. Expand Ummm...I think the Scottish were proud to be anti-government in this scenario. Youāre chasing your tail here. On 7/12/2021 at 1:26 AM, Frat-Train said: Iām doing loops around your reasoning. Nothing more. Expand Not successfully....semantics.
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 (edited) On 7/12/2021 at 1:28 AM, LeGOATski said: Ummm...I think the Scottish were proud to be anti-government in this scenario. Youāre chasing your tail here. Expand Again, start over from the point where the tweets were posted and review how itās referred to by two media sources. Thatās the issue. Not your interpretation of the semantics of words. It grossly oversimplified, intentionally and maliciously, no matter how you navigate and reason with the āwhyā. Youāve chosen to just accept it. Youāve made your choice. So no need to be a part of a conversation where others share there concerns for what youāve admitted doesnāt concern you, right? Edited July 12, 2021 by Frat-Train
LeGOATski Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:32 AM, Frat-Train said: Again, start over from the point where the tweets were posted and review how itās referred to by two media sources. Thatās the issue. Not your interpretation of the semantics of words. It grossly oversimplified, intentionally and maliciously, no matter how you navigate and reason with the āwhyā. Youāve chosen to just accept it. Youāve made your choice. So no need to be a part of a conversation where others share there concerns for what youāve admitted doesnāt concern you, right? Expand This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself. Like Darnold seeing ghosts š I guarantee you didn't read the actual article.
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:37 AM, LeGOATski said: This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself. Like Darnold seeing ghosts š I guarantee you didn't read the actual article. Expand Said: Youāve made your choice. No need to be a part of the āconcernā convo. Reply: This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself. Proof of your intentions and what I suggested earlier. You knowā¦. A few days ago about you guys. Thanks for all you do! š
LeGOATski Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:40 AM, Frat-Train said: Said: Youāve made your choice. No need to be a part of the āconcernā convo. Reply: This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself. Proof of your intentions and what I suggested earlier. You knowā¦. A few days ago about you guys. Thanks for all you do! š Expand I'm not going to assume your intentions, but I recommend reading the actual article and not overreacting to headlines.
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 1:43 AM, LeGOATski said: I'm not going to assume your intentions, but I recommend reading the actual article and not overreacting to headlines. Expand Not only did I read it, I rechecked Twitter and the same concerns that were shared here (and refuted by you) are now trending on Twitter. My intentions are easy to conclude. Theyāre the same as those who are trending; Why that wording was and is used. Again, you donāt have a problem with it. No need to take our conversation any further. We can each separately focus on our perspective of how Iām (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our mediaās phrasing and how you donāt see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.
LeGOATski Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 2:00 AM, Frat-Train said: Not only did I read it, I rechecked Twitter and the same concerns that were shared here (and refuted by you) are now trending on Twitter. My intentions are easy to conclude. Theyāre the same as those who are trending; Why that wording was and is used. Again, you donāt have a problem with it. No need to take our conversation any further. We can each separately focus on our perspective of how Iām (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our mediaās phrasing and how you donāt see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article. Expand Nothing like relying on social media to reinforce your overreaction. š Twitter is the best, huh. Gotta love it. They call it a "personal echo chamber" for a reason.
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 (edited) On 7/12/2021 at 2:04 AM, 716er said: Expand Your first point⦠āitās in Cuba, moronā, hasnāt aged well against the point youāre trying to latch on to now. On 7/12/2021 at 2:09 AM, LeGOATski said: Nothing like relying on social media to reinforce your overreaction. š Twitter is the best, huh. Gotta love it. They call it a "personal echo chamber" for a reason. Expand Ignore the voices of others at all costs, when it doesnāt align to your thinking. Now I know why you hated any words against the Cuban government. Edited July 12, 2021 by Frat-Train 1
LeGOATski Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 2:10 AM, Frat-Train said: 1. Ignore the voices of others at all costs, when it doesnāt align to your thinking. 2. Now I know why you hated any words against the Cuban government. Expand 1: you're a hypocrite 2: you've made me your imaginary enemy This is, sadly, how it typically goes in a society of people who only read headlines and scream into their personal echo chamber
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 2:26 AM, LeGOATski said: 1: you're a hypocrite 2: you've made me your imaginary enemy This is, sadly, how it typically goes in a society of people who only read headlines and scream into their personal echo chamber Expand My response from earlierā¦. (Actually the 2nd time I said it, too.) My intentions are easy to conclude. Theyāre the same as those who are trending; Why that wording was and is used. Again, you donāt have a problem with it. No need to take our conversation any further. We can each separately focus on our perspective of how Iām (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our mediaās phrasing and how you donāt see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.
BillStime Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 2:26 AM, LeGOATski said: 1: you're a hypocrite 2: you've made me your imaginary enemy This is, sadly, how it typically goes in a society of people who only read headlines and scream into their personal echo chamber Expand This is a @Deranged Rhino @Alaska Darin @Buffalo_Gal @Foxx bilslfans.com groupie. Frat wannabe is a fraud. Just watch how quickly his holier than thou attitude turns into a tantrum. On brand for these pigs. Just watch.
LeGOATski Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 2:30 AM, Frat-Train said: (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) Expand a.k.a my personal social media echo chamber š Keep repeating yourself. It's gotten you this far.
Frat-Train Posted July 12, 2021 Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/12/2021 at 2:39 AM, BillStime said: This is a @Deranged Rhino @Alaska Darin @Buffalo_Gal @Foxx bilslfans.com groupie. Frat wannabe is a fraud. Just watch how quickly his holier than thou attitude turns into a tantrum. On brand for these pigs. Just watch. Expand Iām not the one with multiple accounts, resorting to tantrum-style name calling when called out about propaganda spreading. On 7/12/2021 at 2:39 AM, LeGOATski said: a.k.a my personal social media echo chamber š Keep repeating yourself. It's gotten you this far. Expand My response from earlierā¦. (Actually the 3rd time I said it, too.) My intentions are easy to conclude. Theyāre the same as those who are trending; Why that wording was and is used. Again, you donāt have a problem with it. No need to take our conversation any further. We can each separately focus on our perspective of how Iām (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our mediaās phrasing and how you donāt see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.
Recommended Posts