The American Media Should Not Be Trusted

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:23 AM, LeGOATski said:

Would you say the government is doing the oppressing?

 

If yes, then it is anti-government

 

Like William Wallace's famous scream at the end of Braveheart 😆

Expand  

William Wallace screamed freedom in the face of oppression.  No Scottish person believed the English when they later referred to it as “an anti-government display”.  Cmon far left.  Actual fascists are out there….

[LeGOATski]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:20 AM, Frat-Train said:

Same as when the Jews shouted freedom to the Nazis, right?  Or when Taiwan shouts freedom to China?  Ignorance is truly bliss.  But let’s be real…. You’re not here to be politically accurate.  You’re here because you have hatred to give to those who don’t agree with you.  

BTW, Not a fan of Cruz, considering I’m a Democrat.  I’m proof that moderates are the last line of defense before the far left (you) allows the country to be destroyed.  

Context is reading the same rhetoric in all left-leaning headlines, referring to a challenge to an oppressive communist government, simply as “Anti-government “.  It’s the same way they refer to what’s happening in Asia.  But yea, ignorance is bliss and you should continue to focus on the semantics.  

Expand  

You seem to be doing loops around the term "anti-government"

 

Talk about semantics...

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, 716er said:

 

From the perspective of those governments, cries of freedom from the people subjected to their regimes were anti-government. 

 

 

Expand  

Wow…. Stupidity is the main attraction at this zoo.  Noted.

[716er]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, LeGOATski said:

You seem to be doing loops around the term "anti-government"

Expand  

 

Like I said

 

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:12 AM, 716er said:

Disingenuous douchebaggery does go far here, though. 

Expand  

 

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, LeGOATski said:

You seem to be doing loops around the term "anti-government"

 

Talk about semantics...

Expand  

I’m doing loops around your reasoning.  Nothing more.

[LeGOATski]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:25 AM, Frat-Train said:

William Wallace screamed freedom in the face of oppression.  No Scottish person believed the English when they later referred to it as “an anti-government display”.  Cmon far left.  Actual fascists are out there….

Expand  

Ummm...I think the Scottish were proud to be anti-government in this scenario. You’re chasing your tail here.

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:26 AM, Frat-Train said:

I’m doing loops around your reasoning.  Nothing more.

Expand  

Not successfully....semantics.

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:28 AM, LeGOATski said:

Ummm...I think the Scottish were proud to be anti-government in this scenario. You’re chasing your tail here.

Expand  

Again, start over from the point where the tweets were posted and review how it’s referred to by two media sources.  That’s the issue.  Not your interpretation of the semantics of words.  It grossly oversimplified, intentionally and maliciously, no matter how you navigate and reason with the “why”.  You’ve chosen to just accept it.  You’ve made your choice.  So no need to be a part of a conversation where others share there concerns for what you’ve admitted doesn’t concern you, right?  

Edited July 12, 2021 by Frat-Train

[716er]

 

[LeGOATski]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:32 AM, Frat-Train said:

Again, start over from the point where the tweets were posted and review how it’s referred to by two media sources.  That’s the issue.  Not your interpretation of the semantics of words.  It grossly oversimplified, intentionally and maliciously, no matter how you navigate and reason with the “why”.  You’ve chosen to just accept it.  You’ve made your choice.  So no need to be a part of a conversation where others share there concerns for what you’ve admitted doesn’t concern you, right?  

Expand  

This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself. Like Darnold seeing ghosts 😆

 

I guarantee you didn't read the actual article. 

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:37 AM, LeGOATski said:

This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself. Like Darnold seeing ghosts 😆

 

I guarantee you didn't read the actual article. 

Expand  

Said: You’ve made your choice.  No need to be a part of the “concern” convo.

 

Reply:  This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself.

 

Proof of your intentions and what I suggested earlier.  You know…. A few days ago about you guys.

 

Thanks for all you do!  😉

[LeGOATski]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:40 AM, Frat-Train said:

Said: You’ve made your choice.  No need to be a part of the “concern” convo.

 

Reply:  This is an amusing little gaming you're playing with yourself.

 

Proof of your intentions and what I suggested earlier.  You know…. A few days ago about you guys.

 

Thanks for all you do!  😉

Expand  

I'm not going to assume your intentions, but I recommend reading the actual article and not overreacting to headlines.

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 1:43 AM, LeGOATski said:

I'm not going to assume your intentions, but I recommend reading the actual article and not overreacting to headlines.

Expand  

Not only did I read it, I rechecked Twitter and the same concerns that were shared here (and refuted by you) are now trending on Twitter.  My intentions are easy to conclude.  They’re the same as those who are trending;  Why that wording was and is used.  Again, you don’t have a problem with it.  No need to take our conversation any further.  We can each separately focus on our perspective of how I’m (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our media’s phrasing and how you don’t see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.

[716er]

 

 

[LeGOATski]

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:00 AM, Frat-Train said:

Not only did I read it, I rechecked Twitter and the same concerns that were shared here (and refuted by you) are now trending on Twitter.  My intentions are easy to conclude.  They’re the same as those who are trending;  Why that wording was and is used.  Again, you don’t have a problem with it.  No need to take our conversation any further.  We can each separately focus on our perspective of how I’m (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our media’s phrasing and how you don’t see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.

Expand  

Nothing like relying on social media to reinforce your overreaction. 😆

 

Twitter is the best, huh. Gotta love it.

 

They call it a "personal echo chamber" for a reason.

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:04 AM, 716er said:

 

 

Expand  

Your first point…

 

”it’s in Cuba, moron”, hasn’t aged well against the point you’re trying to latch on to now.  

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:09 AM, LeGOATski said:

Nothing like relying on social media to reinforce your overreaction. 😆

 

Twitter is the best, huh. Gotta love it.

 

They call it a "personal echo chamber" for a reason.

Expand  

Ignore the voices of others at all costs, when it doesn’t align to your thinking.  Now I know why you hated any words against the Cuban government.  

Edited July 12, 2021 by Frat-Train

[LeGOATski]

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:10 AM, Frat-Train said:

 1. Ignore the voices of others at all costs, when it doesn’t align to your thinking.  

 

2. Now I know why you hated any words against the Cuban government.  

Expand  

1: you're a hypocrite

 

2: you've made me your imaginary enemy

 

This is, sadly, how it typically goes in a society of people who only read headlines and scream into their personal echo chamber

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:26 AM, LeGOATski said:

1: you're a hypocrite

 

2: you've made me your imaginary enemy

 

This is, sadly, how it typically goes in a society of people who only read headlines and scream into their personal echo chamber

Expand  

My response from earlier…. (Actually the 2nd time I said it, too.)

 

My intentions are easy to conclude.  They’re the same as those who are trending;  Why that wording was and is used.  Again, you don’t have a problem with it.  No need to take our conversation any further.  We can each separately focus on our perspective of how I’m (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our media’s phrasing and how you don’t see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.

[BillStime]

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:26 AM, LeGOATski said:

1: you're a hypocrite

 

2: you've made me your imaginary enemy

 

This is, sadly, how it typically goes in a society of people who only read headlines and scream into their personal echo chamber

Expand  

 

This is a @Deranged Rhino @Alaska Darin @Buffalo_Gal @Foxx bilslfans.com groupie.

 

Frat wannabe is a fraud. Just watch how quickly his holier than thou attitude turns into a tantrum. On brand for these pigs. Just watch.

 

[LeGOATski]

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:30 AM, Frat-Train said:

 (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) 

Expand  

a.k.a my personal social media echo chamber 😆

 

Keep repeating yourself. It's gotten you this far.

[Frat-Train]

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:39 AM, BillStime said:

 

This is a @Deranged Rhino @Alaska Darin @Buffalo_Gal @Foxx bilslfans.com groupie.

 

Frat wannabe is a fraud. Just watch how quickly his holier than thou attitude turns into a tantrum. On brand for these pigs. Just watch.

 

Expand  

I’m not the one with multiple accounts, resorting to tantrum-style name calling when called out about propaganda spreading.  

  On 7/12/2021 at 2:39 AM, LeGOATski said:

a.k.a my personal social media echo chamber 😆

 

Keep repeating yourself. It's gotten you this far.

Expand  

My response from earlier…. (Actually the 3rd time I said it, too.)

 

My intentions are easy to conclude.  They’re the same as those who are trending;  Why that wording was and is used.  Again, you don’t have a problem with it.  No need to take our conversation any further.  We can each separately focus on our perspective of how I’m (along with many Americans on both sides of the spectrum) bothered by our media’s phrasing and how you don’t see an issue on the header, based on the contents of the article.