Tucker Carlson

[B-Man]

 

 

Quick insert:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

18 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Quick insert:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

this is what is commonly known as a rebuttal:  https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/2-plead-guilty-in-scheme-to-sell-joe-bidens-daughters-diary

Founder James O’Keefe has said that Project Veritas ultimately did not publish information from the diary because it could not confirm it belonged to Ashley Biden.  But it's clearly logical to believe an admitted liar ("entertainer") and a disreputable "news" organization that despite huge incentive to publish the diary, never did.  It's truly sad that you continue to dumpster dive for "news" B.  but it is a decently knotted preppy tie.  You'd think he could afford a valet with his ill gotten gains.

Edited February 3, 2023 by redtail hawk

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

i just posted about it.  He believes his war decorated son "lost his life" in Iraq from toxic exposure or at least that this was a strong possibility.  No rebuttals yet. Waiting for the trumpers to say he was stupid to go.   If a coal miners wife said her husband lost his life in the mines but really died from black lung, would that make sense to you?

Not following your argument against citing  Russian propaganda saying that they don't think they should kill Carlson (but everybody else is fair game).  It's pretty obvious on face.  Do i really need to explain further?

Putting the phrase in quotes doesn’t make it an accurate statement given the facts surrounding the death of his son.  I believe he believes, or at least believed on that particular day that his son lost his life in Iraq.  I believe he believes exposure to burn pits lead directly to his son’s death, or at least there was a strong possibility of it.   The slip up and confusion makes perfect sense when the facts are pieced together. 
 

I believe there was a time he would have been able to clearly state his feelings on the relationship between Iraq, burn pits and his son’s subsequent battle with cancer.  I believe at that time, you would not need to add quotation marks to make your comments appear legitimate, nor would you have had to pull up a Newsweek article confirming that his son didn’t actually lose his life in Iraq, but that Joe thought he did. 
 

We know he thought he did, he’s the one who said it, and that’s the whole point.  It’s a sad thing, but part of the aging process for some people.  
 

 

 

[Wacka]

up above, someone mentioned Biden's "stutter". He has dementia. He does not stutter.  He has dementia. The singervMel Tillis stuttered. I stuttered as a kid. The speech pathologist would  come tp my r;ementary school once a week  and meet with me. I could read stuff out loud with no problem  but talking to people was a problem. Through HS, I would stutter in stressful situations or  on certain words.  I was cured of stuttering  in college and grad school. When I had to to  journal club (talk about scientific articles)I was cured of it.  People who know me as an adult are amazed I stuttered as a kid.Joke is senile and serial liar. 

[B-Man]

 

 

Tucker Carlson called Boris Johnson a 'terrified old woman

 

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-boris-johnson-terrified-old-woman-feud-russia-2023-2

 

 

 

.

[Gene Frenkle]

4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Tucker Carlson called Boris Johnson a 'terrified old woman

 

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-boris-johnson-terrified-old-woman-feud-russia-2023-2

 

 

 

.

 

Well, that's a lie. Can you tell the difference @B-Man?

Edited February 3, 2023 by Gene Frenkle

[Joe Ferguson forever]

7 hours ago, Wacka said:

up above, someone mentioned Biden's "stutter". He has dementia. He does not stutter.  He has dementia. The singervMel Tillis stuttered. I stuttered as a kid. The speech pathologist would  come tp my r;ementary school once a week  and meet with me. I could read stuff out loud with no problem  but talking to people was a problem. Through HS, I would stutter in stressful situations or  on certain words.  I was cured of stuttering  in college and grad school. When I had to to  journal club (talk about scientific articles)I was cured of it.  People who know me as an adult are amazed I stuttered as a kid.Joke is senile and serial liar. 

videos of Biden stuttering 14 years ago:  https://stamma.org/your-voice/true-paradox-joe-biden-overcoming-stuttering

[Wacka]

I didn't say  he never   stuttered I believe he used to.  just nowadays when he pauses or starts to lose his place,  his cult calls it stuttering.   in my thesis defense, I had extensive notes  and copies os the ~40 slides, which I never  had to refer to. I tell anybody that has told me they have to public speak, to remember that you are  the expert. They don't know what you are going to talk about.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

1 hour ago, Wacka said:

I didn't say  he never   stuttered I believe he used to.  just nowadays when he pauses or starts to lose his place,  his cult calls it stuttering.   in my thesis defense, I had extensive notes  and copies os the ~40 slides, which I never  had to refer to. I tell anybody that has told me they have to public speak, to remember that you are  the expert. They don't know what you are going to talk about.

this guy https://schneiderspeech.com/phil-schneider and this guy (author of cited piece on Biden) https://schneiderspeech.com/uri-schneider disagree with you and their CV's are available and pretty impressive.

Edited February 4, 2023 by redtail hawk

[B-Man]

Back to the thread.

 

Who will actually watch and who will just make uninformed comments ?

 

 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

8 hours ago, B-Man said:

Back to the thread.

 

Who will actually watch and who will just make uninformed comments ?

 

 

 

It would be logical to conclude that you watch this crap for entertainment purposes since he's self defined as an entertainer.  Does he bring you joy or is this a news source for you?

[B-Man]

2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

It would be logical to conclude that you watch this crap for entertainment purposes since he's self defined as an entertainer.  Does he bring you joy or is this a news source for you?

 

Lather

Rinse

Repeat

 

Same response over and over

 

Thanks for confirming my "uninformed comments" statement. 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Lather

Rinse

Repeat

 

Same response over and over

 

Thanks for confirming my "uninformed comments" statement. 

 

same posts over and over...

“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”
Adolf Hitler

Edited February 4, 2023 by redtail hawk

[BillsFanNC]

1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

same posts over and over...

 

You're obsessed with TC and what he says or does on his current events commentary show.

 

TC owns you just as much as he does the partisans who hang on his every word.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

6 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

You're obsessed with TC and what he says or does on his current events commentary show.

 

TC owns you just as much as he does the partisans who hang on his every word.

Well, no.  I watch some short clips.  That's all I can tolerate.  But if I can convince a few people that he's a lying shill, then I'm winning.  Don Quixote would be proud (is that banned yet?).

[B-Man]

 

 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

51 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

in other news the sky is blue, the ocean is deep.

[JDHillFan]

1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

Well, no.  I watch some short clips.  That's all I can tolerate.  But if I can convince a few people that he's a lying shill, then I'm winning.  Don Quixote would be proud (is that banned yet?).

You are like the great Andrew Cuomo and his covid response - if it saves even one life!*
 

*provided it wasn’t grandma or grandpa. 

[Gene Frenkle]

Just a friendly reminder that Tucker is, self-admittedly, lying to you every day through his infotainment "news" program.

[B-Man]

3 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

 

1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

 

 

 

 

 Reminder kids, today's PPP falsehood of the day is. . . . . . . . "self admittedly"

 

 

If you can keep repeating this twist narrative, who knows ?  it may actually convince another low input poster to believe it

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 Reminder kids, today's PPP falsehood of the day is. . . . . . . . "self admittedly"

 

 

If you can keep repeating this twist narrative, who knows ?  it may actually convince another low input poster to believe it

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

Now, Fred was truly a great man.  I wish we were all like him, spreading absolute goodness.

Edited February 5, 2023 by redtail hawk

[B-Man]

 

 

Tucker Carlson dissects ‘pure absurdity’ of WH & media’s Chinese spy balloon spin

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

[B-Man]

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

could this shill be any less honest as a TV personality?  https://www.mediaite.com/tv/tucker-carlson-called-trump-a-demonic-force-and-a-destroyer-on-day-of-capitol-riot-per-newly-released-text/

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/16/1157558299/fox-news-stars-false-claims-trump-election-2020

selling out the country for ratings.  Even Murdoch knew it was too much. scum...

Edited February 17, 2023 by redtail hawk

[BillsFanNC]

19 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

could this shill be any less honest as a TV personality?  https://www.mediaite.com/tv/tucker-carlson-called-trump-a-demonic-force-and-a-destroyer-on-day-of-capitol-riot-per-newly-released-text/

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/16/1157558299/fox-news-stars-false-claims-trump-election-2020

selling out the country for ratings.  Even Murdoch knew it was too much. scum...

 

Did you double check for bias before posting links to mediaite and npr?

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

21 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Did you double check for bias before posting links to mediaite and npr?

 

You're on ignore but I had to see how you'd defend this. Typical and anticipated. 

Read this and shove your biased news argument. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20527880-dominion-v-fox-news-complaint

Do you think maybe Fox would sue the cited actual news agencies (and win) if the court papers weren't accurately quoted?:

Stupid people are destroying this country by allowing themselves to be influenced by proven liars.  They are disenfranchised by their own lack of valuable skills and see violence and deceit as their only chance at some measure of success.  It's sad really. 

[BillsFanNC]

6 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

You're on ignore but I had to see how you'd defend this. Typical and anticipated. 

Read this and shove your biased news argument. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20527880-dominion-v-fox-news-complaint

Do you think maybe Fox would sue the cited actual news agencies (and win) if the court papers weren't accurately quoted?:

Stupid people are destroying this country by allowing themselves to be influenced by proven liars.  They are disenfranchised by their own lack of valuable skills and see violence and deceit as their only chance at some measure of success.  It's sad really. 

 

Nah. I'll just put you on ignore in kind. You have more than proven yourself to be in the @BillStime and @Tiberius class.

 

A useless PPP poster not worth a nanosecond more of my time.

 

 

[BillStime]

👆🤡 the definition of a pathetic simp 
 

 

[SoCal Deek]

11 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

 

Stupid people are destroying this country by allowing themselves to be influenced by proven liars.  They are disenfranchised by their own lack of valuable skills and see violence and deceit as their only chance at some measure of success.  It's sad really. 

Antifa watches Tucker Carlson? I’m not sure that’s his target demographic but you do you. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

Antifa watches Tucker Carlson? I’m not sure that’s his target demographic but you do you. 

and the debate judges quickly invalidate the rebuttal but are in turn called elitists by the losers.

[SoCal Deek]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

and the debate judges quickly invalidate the rebuttal but are in turn called elitists by the losers.

I have no idea what that means but I think it made me chuckle. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I have no idea what that means but I think it made me chuckle. 

yes, $hi!s and giggles.  but I'm very interested in the response to the court papers by the Tucker acolytes.

Edited February 17, 2023 by redtail hawk

[Joe Ferguson forever]

is this source more comfortable to you Tucker (and ingraham, hannity, Dobbs etc) fans?  https://www.fox5vegas.com/2023/02/16/fox-dominion-defamation-suit-is-assault-first-amendment/

Edited February 17, 2023 by redtail hawk

[SoCal Deek]

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

is this source more comfortable to you Tucker (and in graham, hannity, Hobbs etc) fans?  https://www.fox5vegas.com/2023/02/16/fox-dominion-defamation-suit-is-assault-first-amendment/

Now do CNN and the rest of the mainstream media with the Russia-gate, and Hunter laptop stories. Do ALL of these channels, including Fox, have an agenda and a target audience? Obviously they do. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Now do CNN and the rest of the mainstream media with the Russia-gate, and Hunter laptop stories. Do ALL of these channels, including Fox, have an agenda and a target audience? Obviously they do. 

yes, that's why I ingest both sides and original source material.  But let's talk about the recent Dominion court papers.  Do you defend Fox actions in this particular case?   Are their actions helpful to meaningful political discourse and democracy?

Edited February 17, 2023 by redtail hawk

[SoCal Deek]

3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, that's why I ingest both sides and original source material.  But let's talk about the recent Dominion court papers.  Do you defend Fox actions in this particular case?   Are their actions helpful to meaningful political discourse and democracy?

Oh come on! The other side literally and knowingly lied to the American people to sway the electorate prior to an election. And that was after they literally, and knowingly lied to the electorate to promote a ridiculous impeachment proceeding, only to hire these same ‘insurrectionists’ as contributors. And that was after they promoted a later to be convicted criminal as the next democratic presidential candidate. Shall we go on? Yes…BOTH sides are looking for ratings. Is this somehow complicated to you? 

[BillStime]

24 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Nah. I'll just put you on ignore in kind. You have more than proven yourself to be in the @BillStime and @Tiberius class.

 

A useless PPP poster not worth a nanosecond more of my time.

 

 

So difficult to swallow pride.
 

How embarrassing - their “leaders” and “mouthpieces” embarrass these freaks every single day.

 

Are you tired of winning? 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

9 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Oh come on! The other side literally and knowingly lied to the American people to sway the electorate prior to an election. And that was after they literally, and knowingly lied to the electorate to promote a ridiculous impeachment proceeding, only to hire these same ‘insurrectionists’ as contributors. And that was after they promoted a later to be convicted criminal as the next democratic presidential candidate. Shall we go on? Yes…BOTH sides are looking for ratings. Is this somehow complicated to you? 

not complicated at all.  Searching for the truth is difficult in today's news environment.  As I recall, trump was actually impeached in the house.  That takes a majority of elected house members, not my pillow quacks and lawyers who Fox' own personalities call nuts (and then interview as purported experts).  I'm unaware of cases that I would consider analogous in my favored references. There are probably threads here with hundreds of posts trying to make that case, however,

Let's move on from what aboutism and discuss Tucker and his proven (more info by the day)dishonesty and self serving, destructive actions.
 

Edited February 17, 2023 by redtail hawk

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

9 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Oh come on! The other side literally and knowingly lied to the American people to sway the electorate prior to an election. And that was after they literally, and knowingly lied to the electorate to promote a ridiculous impeachment proceeding, only to hire these same ‘insurrectionists’ as contributors. And that was after they promoted a later to be convicted criminal as the next democratic presidential candidate. Shall we go on? Yes…BOTH sides are looking for ratings. Is this somehow complicated to you? 

Of course they did.  There is a mountain of evidence detailing exactly what happened, but in spite of that, the election denier-deniers are perfectly comfortable ignoring it.  The "Stolen election" claims followed the previous election model formulated by democrats and their "Illegitimate Election" strategy.   We can look back farther various and sundry ways dems pitched stolen elections, sought to use the electors to derail a vote, spoke of widespread voter disenfranchisement that resulted in illegitimate elections, and on and on. 

 

 

*See @redtail hawkabove for "...but I don't want to talk about that..'

 

Edited February 17, 2023 by leh-nerd skin-erd