Wacka Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 (edited) The left thinks 1984 is an instruction book. Edited March 4, 2021 by Wacka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 The right thinks Dr. Seuss was cancelled. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, Wacka said: The left thinks 1984 is an instruction book. What time is the inauguration today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, 716er said: The right thinks Dr. Seuss was cancelled. No. The "right" knows exactly what is happening.............. Biden becomes the first Prez in a long time not too include Dr. Seuss in the national recognition day of Children's Lit. The next day Seuss publisher's cancel future production of poor selling books, proclaiming "enlightenment" as the reasons. Libs and Conservatives argue over the "REAL" meaning it's another demonstration of "progressive' nonsense and "squirrel sighting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 the national recognition day of Children's Lit. is not a thing. Read Across America Day is. Neither Bill Clinton nor George W. Bush Jr. made a Read Across America Day Proclamation. The "tradition" of name dropping Dr. Suess on Read Across America Day was started by Obama and continued by Trump - not sure that's a "tradition," but whatever floats your Trump boat parade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 32 minutes ago, 716er said: the national recognition day of Children's Lit. is not a thing. Read Across America Day is. Neither Bill Clinton nor George W. Bush Jr. made a Read Across America Day Proclamation. The "tradition" of name dropping Dr. Suess on Read Across America Day was started by Obama and continued by Trump - not sure that's a "tradition," but whatever floats your Trump boat parade. Way to miss the point, by picking at a mistake about the name. Quote it's another demonstration of "progressive' nonsense and "squirrel sighting. Nothing more, nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 8 minutes ago, B-Man said: Way to miss the point, by picking at a mistake about the name. Nothing more, nothing less. Performative outrage - that's all the GQP has to offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 Also: EBAY BANNING SALES OF NOW-FORBIDDEN DR. SEUSS BOOKS. This isn’t normal or reasonable and don’t let them gaslight you into thinking it is. This is warped and un-American and the people pushing it should be ashamed. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ebay-dr-seuss-books-listings-removed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motorin' Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 (edited) 13 hours ago, Buffarukus said: you son of a parent. lol. you made me download the pdf and try to comprehend that garbage. 43 pages!! i see fact check that says it was for that single piece of legislation then i also see Under the changes, words like “father,” “mother,” “son,” “daughter,” “brother” and “sister” will be replaced in official documents by the gender-neutral terms “parent,” “child” or “sibling,” respectively. so what is a "official documents"..plural? im not sure but it would lead me to believe that this can easily be seen as a beginning step. i never thought that they were banning gendered language from speeches. if a republican said father i wasn't implying that they would halt the proceedings and arrest someone from speaking. but did think it was required for all bills and rules as i would think that would be concidered having to be written up on "official documents". either way it looks to be a virtue signaling tactic that does not encompass as much as i thought. ill admit i may have not gotten the full facts on it and have been enlightened. ill def look more into it more now. what i will say, when it comes to this. its a drop in the bucket. so then you have this interaction between rand paul and rachel levine. i think that deserves a direct answer. but maybe thats me. just another drop in the bucket. then you have attempted censorship by the ACLU of a book on the study of the damage to transgendered teens who have made irreparable decisions. WHY would this be on a censor list? why would someone have to fight a organization that used to fight for freedom of speech? just to hide that there ARE negative consequences to these decisions. it isnt all sunshine for some people and the decision should be taken VERY seriously. another drop. https://www.iwf.org/2020/11/16/some-in-aclu-have-new-cause-book-banning/ so then we look at the amount of childrens books, shows, influences, forced educations, even against their parents wishes. (some examples shown in this thread). the fight against established science of two sexes. the rise of "violence" if you use the wrong pronoun and banning off platforms for even discussing the other side. the women right advocates being attacked for wanting their own sports, scholarships ect. ect. its almost if there werent gay pride parades all over the country. gay bars and night clubs. gay actors and performers who have been very successful. gay right to marry. shows specifically designated towards this lifestyle, some of which was established decades before any of this. but the lgbt community has a subsector of trans so we MUST focus all our attention on that now. if you don't, or question it publically, then you are a bigot. and you wonder why this subject envokes a emotional response? why people are swayed by another announcement of a drip going into the , you must conform to this thinking or else, bucket? There is a pretty good chance that Rand Paul was either intentionally lying or citing false claims about Dr. Levine's position when he opened his remarks claiming that she endorses surgical distruction of children's genitalia. Her documented medical opinion follows standards of care she reffered to in her answer, that minors should never undergo sexual reassignment surgery. So why didn't she answer the question? She probably didn't want to get pulled into an argument with someone she believed questioning her in bad faith. It's sort of like this thread, six pages deep, with multiple posters still hammering the idea that the left canceled Dr. Seuss. It's like trying to talk it this guy. Edited March 4, 2021 by Motorin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffarukus Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 (edited) 6 hours ago, Motorin' said: There is a pretty good chance that Rand Paul was either intentionally lying or citing false claims about Dr. Levine's position when he opened his remarks claiming that she endorses surgical distruction of children's genitalia. Her documented medical opinion follows standards of care she reffered to in her answer, that minors should never undergo sexual reassignment surgery. So why didn't she answer the question? She probably didn't want to get pulled into an argument with someone she believed questioning her in bad faith. It's sort of like this thread, six pages deep, with multiple posters still hammering the idea that the left canceled Dr. Seuss. It's like trying to talk it this guy. thank you for your question senator. i can absolutley affirm that i will not allow the government to supersede a parents decision and will also absolutely require adult parental consent and full consultations. it is important to fully discuss all options and negative lifelong effects before ever begining any treatments toward gender reassignment, hormone or puberty blocker procedures for minors. if she already believes this then it should be easy to say out loud while in a confirmation hearing. seems pretty reasonable and easy to me. not sure where a argument could be started. Edited March 5, 2021 by Buffarukus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
716er Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/isis-claims-responsibility-slaying-three-women-media-members-afghanistan/ ISIS claims responsibility for slaying of three women media members in Afghanistan MARCH 3, 2021 / 3:17 AM / AP Kabul, Afghanistan — The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has claimed responsibility for the killing of three women working for a local radio and TV station in eastern Afghanistan, the latest in a spike in targeted killings across the war-tor country. Dozens of people gathered Wednesday for the funerals of the three media workers. The women were gunned down Tuesday in separate attacks, according to the news editor of the privately owned station and officials in Nangarhar province. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motorin' Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 29 minutes ago, Buffarukus said: thank you for your question senator. i can absolutley affirm that i will not allow the government to superced a parents decision and will also absolutely require adult parental consent and full consultations. it is important to fully discuss all options and negative lifelong effects before ever begining any treatments toward gender reassignment, hormone or puberty blocker procedures for minors. seems pretty reasonable and easy to me. not sure where a argument could be started. Children can't get sexual reassignment surgery even with parental consent. That's not only medical standard, it's Levine's stated option. Yet Rand Paul seemed to be citing facebook memes claiming Levine proposes that any child can have their sexual organs mutilated without parental consent. Her answer was a polite, "bless your heart." I would like to see a detailed written response from her clarifying her positions. But I'm not upset that she didn't answer Rand Paul's "when did you stop beating your wife" style question. I think the reality is that US medicine has performed thousands of gentile mutilation surgeries on infants in order to make intersex children conform to binary gender norms, and it is still happening today. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/07/25/i-want-be-nature-made-me/medically-unnecessary-surgeries-intersex-children-us# Yes, the question of hormones and puberty blockers is important, as is parental consent. I'm sure there are some people who take Levine's invention to talk in depth about the issues, without answering Rand Paul in the moment, as proof that she wants to force all children to be sexually reassigned without parental consent. And there will some who take it even further as proof that she is part of the pedo baby eating ring. Here's what I think, Dr. Seuss is not canceled. You can still buy a Mr. Potato Head. Children shouldn't be able to get sexual reassignment surgery until they are adults, and only after they go through a really really really long process to make sure that's what they truly want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WideNine Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 On 3/3/2021 at 7:46 AM, B-Man said: As I posted back on the first page, I am very familiar with Dr. Seuss and his history. It was the rest of his statement that was (certainly) not able to be supported by links, because it is OPINION, and false one at that. See ?...........easy. Can kind of tell you did not read my full reply either... "Now completely trying to black ball all the man's work that has enriched so many lives because of a few misteps. That would be the essence of cancel culture. To those proponents who cannot grasp moderation I wonder, who is their perfect human author that is capable of avoiding any level of offense from their work these days? No such person or author exists." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Also: EBAY BANNING SALES OF NOW-FORBIDDEN DR. SEUSS BOOKS. This isn’t normal or reasonable and don’t let them gaslight you into thinking it is. This is warped and un-American and the people pushing it should be ashamed. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ebay-dr-seuss-books-listings-removed some of them had been bid up to over $1000 25 minutes ago, WideNine said: Can kind of tell you did not read my full reply either... "Now completely trying to black ball all the man's work that has enriched so many lives because of a few misteps. That would be the essence of cancel culture. To those proponents who cannot grasp moderation I wonder, who is their perfect human author that is capable of avoiding any level of offense from their work these days? No such person or author exists." Please don’t use that phrase any more. 😂 https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/07/06/us/racism-words-phrases-slavery-trnd/index.html Edited March 4, 2021 by Over 29 years of fanhood 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WideNine Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: some of them had been bid up to over $1000 Please don’t use that phrase any more. 😂 https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/07/06/us/racism-words-phrases-slavery-trnd/index.html Just silly right? That term originally came from a mark used on a ballot. No racial anything. Edited March 5, 2021 by WideNine 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffarukus Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 2 hours ago, Motorin' said: Children can't get sexual reassignment surgery even with parental consent. That's not only medical standard, it's Levine's stated option. Yet Rand Paul seemed to be citing facebook memes claiming Levine proposes that any child can have their sexual organs mutilated without parental consent. Her answer was a polite, "bless your heart." I would like to see a detailed written response from her clarifying her positions. But I'm not upset that she didn't answer Rand Paul's "when did you stop beating your wife" style question. I think the reality is that US medicine has performed thousands of gentile mutilation surgeries on infants in order to make intersex children conform to binary gender norms, and it is still happening today. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/07/25/i-want-be-nature-made-me/medically-unnecessary-surgeries-intersex-children-us# Yes, the question of hormones and puberty blockers is important, as is parental consent. I'm sure there are some people who take Levine's invention to talk in depth about the issues, without answering Rand Paul in the moment, as proof that she wants to force all children to be sexually reassigned without parental consent. And there will some who take it even further as proof that she is part of the pedo baby eating ring. Here's what I think, Dr. Seuss is not canceled. You can still buy a Mr. Potato Head. Children shouldn't be able to get sexual reassignment surgery until they are adults, and only after they go through a really really really long process to make sure that's what they truly want. if you want a neutral prospective on what is going on in my opinion listen to this. i think it sums it up well. im a old school democrat. the party has done a complete 180. i cant blame younger democrats as they really dont know any better. but if anyone is like me and felt they represented you in the past and you still support them now. to me you never had principles. you were given them. i have to sit here and defend the right wing because they are all that is left of the resistance. each side will always bicker over garbage that's thrown into the mixer. its why it always ramps up during election time. keep looking at the red beam and pay no attention to who has their hands on the levers. bombs keep getting dropped and the working class keep getting siphoned...regardless of who is presented as the face of the party in power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 4 hours ago, Buffarukus said: ...if HE already believes this then it should be easy to say out loud while in a confirmation hearing...l The tranny still had a member. Hasn't cut to off. Is a HE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 REMEMBER WHEN THEY TOLD US THINGS WOULD GET LESS CRAZY IN 2021? 😆 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 2 hours ago, B-Man said: REMEMBER WHEN THEY TOLD US THINGS WOULD GET LESS CRAZY IN 2021? 😆 True freedom to me looks like Cindy Lou Who singing Cardi B’s WAP. #imagine 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts