Jump to content

Moscow Marge + Lauren Bobo = the face of Putin and the QOP


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Demongyz said:

It would turn to civil war when all the red parts around the large cities want to join with the red states and the blue cities realize they can't feed themselves or produce power and so on.  Would get nasty pretty quick.

 

We really just need the Federal Gov do what they are supposed to and get out of the way.  Let the states do what they do.

nope.  other way around.  blue areas currently support red areas.  blue voting districts account for 75% of state and local taxes and 73% of federal tax.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

nope.  other way around.  blue areas currently support red areas.  blue voting districts account for 75% of state and local taxes and 73% of federal tax.

Yes, with taxes.

 

Too bad red areas have all the resources.  Cant make all that white collar money without power, water, food, gas etc.

 

Oh yeah, guns.

Edited by Demongyz
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Demongyz said:

Yes, with taxes.

 

Too bad red areas have all the resources.  Cant make all that white collar money without power, water, food, gas etc.

 

Oh yeah, guns.

So you're saying the red states would refuse to sell products to the blue?  How are they going to make up for all the lost "income" from social programs like welfare, food stamps and medicaid?  it will be difficult for them to wean from the gov't teets.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

So you're saying the red states would refuse to sell products to the blue?  How are they going to make up for all the lost "income" from social programs like welfare, food stamps and medicaid?  it will be difficult for them to wean from the gov't teets.

It's war, starve them out, pick up the pieces.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone supporting the dissolution of the United States is a traitor and should be treated as such.

 

We may have our disagreements but the moment you start seeing your fellow Americans as the enemy is the moment you’ve betrayed the values this country was founded upon. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Anyone supporting the dissolution of the United States is a traitor and should be treated as such.

 

We may have our disagreements but the moment you start seeing your fellow Americans as the enemy is the moment you’ve betrayed the values this country was founded upon. 

i wonder what percent of the current US population believes armed revolt is appropriate now.  my guess would be at least 5-10%.  any wonder Justice is worried about the bad guys knowing where the cameras are in the capitol.  For the record, I'm being facetious re separation of states.  It is treasonous.  Just pointing out the economic consequences of the idea the evil congresswomen advanced.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always seen the "national divorce" sort of talk as a mechanism for right-of-center Americans to vent frustration both at the current state of government AND the current state of the Republican party. That they see separation from the country as a more plausible route to government representation than overthrowing GOPe leadership.

 

We're already seeing some trends toward decentralization in Florida, Texas, Arizona. States accelerating towards that rather than open war seems far more likely. The question is whether the federal government wishes to attempt state leadership overthrow or perhaps kill people in some fruitless attempt to stop it. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LeviF said:

I've always seen the "national divorce" sort of talk as a mechanism for right-of-center Americans to vent frustration both at the current state of government AND the current state of the Republican party. That they see separation from the country as a more plausible route to government representation than overthrowing GOPe leadership.

 

We're already seeing some trends toward decentralization in Florida, Texas, Arizona. States accelerating towards that rather than open war seems far more likely. The question is whether the federal government wishes to attempt state leadership overthrow or perhaps kill people in some fruitless attempt to stop it. 

in other words, they can't pick a team.  Not sure they're gonna find one they agree with on the state level.  If it doesn't pander to them at the expense of everyone else, it's no good.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Anyone supporting the dissolution of the United States is a traitor and should be treated as such.

 

We may have our disagreements but the moment you start seeing your fellow Americans as the enemy is the moment you’ve betrayed the values this country was founded upon. 

Couldn’t agree more. It far better to stay married in an abusive relationship where one side calls the other side, deplorable, Neanderthal terrorists. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Couldn’t agree more. It far better to stay married in an abusive relationship where one side calls the other side, deplorable, Neanderthal terrorists. 😉

 

In an actual divorce, it's possible to go separate ways. With MAGA vs the rest of us, that doesn't seem very possible, mostly due to geography. Maybe Marge should lead MAGA in a takeover of Canada or Mexico.

 

It's a treasonous sentiment, regardless.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gene Frenkle said:

 

In an actual divorce, it's possible to go separate ways. With MAGA vs the rest of us, that doesn't seem very possible, mostly due to geography. Maybe Marge should lead MAGA in a takeover of Canada or Mexico.

 

It's a treasonous sentiment, regardless.

She’s a clown. But pointing to her as having coming out of nowhere is naive. She’s a product of my earlier post. You can’t keep calling people worthless trash without them eventually taking offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

She’s a clown. But pointing to her as having coming out of nowhere is naive. She’s a product of my earlier post. You can’t keep calling people worthless trash without them eventually taking offense. 

 

She's powerful right now, and dangerous.

 

I want to preface this by saying that I'm not calling her Hitler:

 

Hitler was considered a clown as well, until he wasn't. Just because she's a clown, doesn't mean she should just be ignored and left to put on her clown show unchecked.

 

This latest GOP Nazi vibe is getting a bit unnerving.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

She's powerful right now, and dangerous.

 

I want to preface this by saying that I'm not calling her Hitler:

 

Hitler was considered a clown as well, until he wasn't. Just because she's a clown, doesn't mean she should just be ignored and left to put on her clown show unchecked.

 

This latest GOP Nazi vibe is getting a bit unnerving.

She’s a clown. Period. Relax Gene. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

in other words, they can't pick a team.  Not sure they're gonna find one they agree with on the state level.  If it doesn't pander to them at the expense of everyone else, it's no good.


They’ll still vote republican. They just won’t enjoy it. 
 

Their options are either A. All the leftist policies they hate at the speed of light or B. All the leftist policies they hate at the speed of sound. 
 

The “third parties” are all bad. Green Party full of nuts, lolbertarian party’s big draw is teenagers and most of them can’t vote. 

 

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


That’s an absolutely ridiculous comparison and you know it. 


Because the Hitler comparison is so apt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Divorces in abusive relationships don’t usually end in an actual war. What is being proposed here would. 

You’re a reasonable guy Goose. Did you REALLY think that elected officials could call American citizens every name in the book, and it NOT end up with some people getting REALLY pissed off? Really? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You’re a reasonable guy Goose. Did you REALLY think that elected officials could call American citizens every name in the book, and it NOT end up with some people getting REALLY pissed off? Really? 


Sure, people get pissed off at the dumbest things. 
 

Doesn’t mean that a second civil war is a good idea. 
 

Maybe we should focus our energies on reforms that would turn down the heat instead of accelerating it. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone believe the stockpile of civilian weaponry could compete with F16's and state of the art drones etc?  It'd be over faster than you can say Iraq.  But people would needlessly die.  Ridiculous to even consider.  Sure there are people that would be traitors within the military but punish a few appropriately and it would stop quickly.  c'mon guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


Sure, people get pissed off at the dumbest things. 
 

Doesn’t mean that a second civil war is a good idea. 
 

Maybe we should focus our energies on reforms that would turn down the heat instead of accelerating it. 

Okay…so ‘you’ have the bulky pulpit now. How about if Biden knocks it off? Do we have a deal? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Does anyone believe the stockpile of civilian weaponry could compete with F16's and state of the art drones etc?  It'd be over faster than you can say Iraq.  But people would needlessly die.  Ridiculous to even consider.  Sure there are people that would be traitors within the military but punish a few appropriately and it would stop quickly.  c'mon guys.


Again, are these the same F16s and state of the art drones that couldn’t beat a bunch of opium farmers armed with thirty year old AKs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LeviF said:


Again, are these the same F16s and state of the art drones that couldn’t beat a bunch of opium farmers armed with thirty year old AKs?

they did a bang up job in Iraq and the terrain would be very familiar.  I'd wager the stockpile locations of weapons are already known.  That and Bill Gates has already altered the DNA of every American...just needs to selectively throw the switch.  And we have awesome space lasers.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...