Jump to content

Trump Is Just A Terrible President, Totally Unfit For The Job


Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, ~Kostabi~ said:

what a cute pithy comment. Why not ask service people what THEY think about their commander and chief saying something like that about an ex service member POW. They are who matter in this discussion not a keyboard warrior judgmental know it all like yourself.

 

22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I have. Many times. 

 

They agree with him because, unlike you, they know exactly who No Name was and what he stood for. 

 

You don't. Because you'd rather keep to proper decorum than learn the truth.

Classic. 

 

?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

If people want to kill mass numbers of other people, there are ways to go about it without guns.

 

And I don't know if I think anyone really needs even a semi-automatic gun and I think that background checks should be done, but won't root-out everyone.  I'm just wondering how far we should go to keep society safe?

 

Para 1.  Definitely.  Certain guns, however, still are an effective, convenient, and frankly preferred method. 

 

Para 2.  For me, reinstituting assault weapons ban is the way to go.  But this is an impossible problem, and I'm not sure it possible to give a great answer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ~Kostabi~ said:

what a cute pithy comment. Why not ask service people what THEY think about their commander and chief saying something like that about an ex service member POW. They are who matter in this discussion not a keyboard warrior judgmental know it all like yourself.

From this comment I feel you think the Military service members do not support our president. I am wondering why you think they do not?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Re-instituting something that did nothing to stop gun violence is the way to go ... to prevent gun violence.

 

Dynamite logic. 

 

There you go again with your fake news and hoaxes.  No facts or data to support your position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

There you go again with your fake news and hoaxes.  No facts or data to support your position. 

 

The assault weapon ban did not end gun violence in any statistically significant manner. 

 

You're wrong. 

 

Again. 

 

All the way. 

 

But please, tell us how you want to go back to old policies, which didn't work, to combat your fear of an inanimate object. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Out of curiosity, what is your profession if you don't mind?

 

Attorney and writer.  The law stuff pays better than the other endeavors.

 

Quite honestly I'm here because I miss the give and take of the profession and I'm trying to cut my teeth arguing with a different group of people with different insights and compasses than I would normally spar with.  I guess that's why I came here in the first place yesterday.  Today it's more amusement than anything else. 

 

So yeah, you're kind of guinea pigs.  But it's harder to argue with people who are unpredictable, and that's what's happened here.  So I'm learning a lot and it's been an instructive couple of days.  Maybe I'll be better for the investment of time.  At least that was the idea.  Gotta make the best of a lousy situation and try to learn something. 

 

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The assault weapon ban did not end gun violence in any statistically significant manner. 

 

You're wrong. 

 

Again. 

 

All the way. 

 

But please, tell us how you want to go back to old policies, which didn't work, to combat your fear of an inanimate object. 

 

More fakey newsy here. It should be easy to prove that I'm wrong.  But apparently you'd rather try to perpetrate a hoax here. 

Edited by SectionC3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Still running from logic. Still pushing fear. Still protecting those who are enemies of humanity because he's too stupid and programmed to know better. 

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

More fakey newsy here. It should be easy to prove that I'm wrong.  But apparently you'd rather try to perpetrate a hoax here. 

 

Oops. From the ultra right leaning LA Times no less. 

 

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-stokes-assault-weapon-ban-20180301-story.html

 

Again, keep pushing ignorance and fear of an inanimate object as if you're the smartest guy in the room. Then run away from your words, change screen names (again) and try it all again. 

 

Sad person, who's pushing the enemy's talking points without knowing it because he'd rather have his feelings validated than grapple with the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Still running from logic. Still pushing fear. Still protecting those who are enemies of humanity because he's too stupid and programmed to know better. 

 

Oops. From the ultra right leaning LA Times no less. 

 

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-stokes-assault-weapon-ban-20180301-story.html

 

Again, keep pushing ignorance and fear of an inanimate object as if you're the smartest guy in the room. Then run away from your words, change screen names (again) and try it all again. 

 

Sad person, who's pushing the enemy's talking points without knowing it because he'd rather have his feelings validated than grapple with the truth. 

 

I can conceive of no conclusion other than you are a liberal MSM plant sent here to confuse the world.  That is the only possible explanation for all of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

I can conceive of no conclusion other than you are a liberal MSM plant sent here to confuse the world.  That is the only possible explanation for all of this. 

 

Note the JA tactic: 

 

Can't refute the evidence -- so change the topic to the absurd. 

 

Keep protecting those monsters who prey on children, JA. You're doing a service to your masters. 

(See, I can do it too)

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Note the JA tactic: 

 

Can't refute the evidence -- so change the topic to the absurd. 

 

Keep protecting those monsters who prey on children, JA. You're doing a service to your masters. 

 

There you go again with your hoaxes.  I have to say your imagination is extremely impressive. 

7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Still running from logic. Still pushing fear. Still protecting those who are enemies of humanity because he's too stupid and programmed to know better. 

 

Oops. From the ultra right leaning LA Times no less. 

 

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-stokes-assault-weapon-ban-20180301-story.html

 

Again, keep pushing ignorance and fear of an inanimate object as if you're the smartest guy in the room. Then run away from your words, change screen names (again) and try it all again. 

 

Sad person, who's pushing the enemy's talking points without knowing it because he'd rather have his feelings validated than grapple with the truth. 

 

You quoted an op-ed, by the way.  Might want to find a study, at which point I could be convinced to pay attention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a coward. Got (multiple) former handles run off for his blisteringly dishonest manner of discussion, and is back again to wow us all with his love of the establishment and hatred of thinking for one's self. 

 

The King of the asshats returns. Until he runs away (again) after being embarrassed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Such a coward. Got (multiple) former handles run off for his blisteringly dishonest manner of discussion, and is back again to wow us all with his love of the establishment and hatred of thinking for one's self. 

 

The King of the asshats returns. Until he runs away (again) after being embarrassed. 

 

Not sure what you're talking about.  But it's probably more fake news or fake logic. 

 

(for what it's worth, you're wrong about the multiple handles and all of the other stuff)

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Such a coward. Got (multiple) former handles run off for his blisteringly dishonest manner of discussion, and is back again to wow us all with his love of the establishment and hatred of thinking for one's self. 

 

The King of the asshats returns. Until he runs away (again) after being embarrassed. 

 

Still no study, though, right?  Gonna rest on the op-ed?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

(for what it's worth, you're wrong about the multiple handles and all of the other stuff)

 

 

Still no study, though, right?  Gonna rest on the op-ed?

 

 

And yet you use the same wordings, same ***** logic, and dishonest arguments that he does. ***** off now and do your own homework.

 

Or, better yet, stay in the fetal position scared of inanimate objects while lying to the rest of us about your actual identity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And yet you use the same wordings, same ***** logic, and dishonest arguments that he does. ***** off now and do your own homework.

 

Or, better yet, stay in the fetal position scared of inanimate objects while lying to the rest of us about your actual identity.  

 

You're still trying to perpetrate a hoax.  Prove me wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Attorney and writer.  The law stuff pays better than the other endeavors.

 

Quite honestly I'm here because I miss the give and take of the profession and I'm trying to cut my teeth arguing with a different group of people with different insights and compasses than I would normally spar with.  I guess that's why I came here in the first place yesterday.  Today it's more amusement than anything else. 

 

So yeah, you're kind of guinea pigs.  But it's harder to argue with people who are unpredictable, and that's what's happened here.  So I'm learning a lot and it's been an instructive couple of days.  Maybe I'll be better for the investment of time.  At least that was the idea.  Gotta make the best of a lousy situation and try to learn something. 

 

 

More fakey newsy here. It should be easy to prove that I'm wrong.  But apparently you'd rather try to perpetrate a hoax here. 


I sure hope you’re not trying to make a living at litigation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


I sure hope you’re not trying to make a living at litigation. 


Why is that? 

3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Crayola64?

 Yeah there’s a new color coming out.  Called “hoax.”  Crayola is making it in a fake tan  orange shade. 

2 hours ago, westside said:

Works in a laundromat

Never done that.  Lots of odd jobs, though. Builds character.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Breaking news: Rus took a break from committing voter fraud to put this together and Carl showed up with his bullhorn and hopefully one of mad as hell wiffle bats to stage this doozy of a protest.  
 

there’s probably at least 250,000 drivers in the Buffalo metro area and these guys got a whopping 150 of them to show for this.  Bang up job again, boys.  
 

https://buffalonews.com/2020/04/20/protest-shows-frustrations-are-mounting-but-expert-says-pandemic-is-far-from-over/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Sorry to disappoint you.  Maybe you should put down the cutlery and firearms and take your skills to a law school near you.  From the sounds of it you think you can run me over in court.   So have at it! 

Just ignore Jim. He’s actually the chef from muppets. He knows more about everyone else’s jobs than they do. Well, actually he’s not even a chef anymore. After failing at that, he’s moved on to giving people advice on what to do with their money! ???

Soon he will be a real estate salesman in Oakland. Just double check the neighborhood yourself before purchasing from him!!! ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chef is a money manager?  Are you serious?  I’m actually curious what the pro advice is right now.  I’ve been cleaning up the last couple of weeks, so there’s a little more to play with and I’m looking for ideas.  Interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Chef is a money manager?  Are you serious?  I’m actually curious what the pro advice is right now.  I’ve been cleaning up the last couple of weeks, so there’s a little more to play with and I’m looking for ideas.  Interesting. 

Oh yeah! I hear he is in such demand that people are kicking his door down! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Chef is a money manager?  Are you serious?  I’m actually curious what the pro advice is right now.  I’ve been cleaning up the last couple of weeks, so there’s a little more to play with and I’m looking for ideas.  Interesting. 


I’m a money manager?  Nice try counselor. If you’re going to succeed in an argument I suggest you find someone else other than Q to get your information from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Sorry to disappoint you.  Maybe you should put down the cutlery and firearms and take your skills to a law school near you.  From the sounds of it you think you can run me over in court.   So have at it! 

The last few exchanges here are exactly the reason why Chef questioned your abilities. There are very good reasons why you were asked the questions you were asked. If you are to be believed that you are not a reincarnation of another poster then you have recklessly entered the fray here without doing your homework, on par with asking a witness in court a question you don't already have the answer to.  If you want to practice your debating skills here like you indicated then come prepared and don't think it will be like some Whack-A-Mole game. You should have lurked for awhile. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

The last few exchanges here are exactly the reason why Chef questioned your abilities. There are very good reasons why you were asked the questions you were asked. If you are to be believed that you are not a reincarnation of another poster then you have recklessly entered the fray here without doing your homework, on par with asking a witness in court a question you don't already have the answer to.  If you want to practice your debating skills here like you indicated then come prepared and don't think it will be like some Whack-A-Mole game. You should have lurked for awhile. 

Oh STFU. How dare anyone enter and interrupt the cult! You are the reason people hang around and ***** with you clowns. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Q-baby! said:

Oh STFU. How dare anyone enter and interrupt the cult! You are the reason people hang around and ***** with you clowns. 


For someone who a according to you has it made in the shade you are one angry dude. I used to say money can’t buy you happiness but it can buy you a big ole yacht and you can sail right up next to it. Looks like it got you got a dingy with a leak. 
 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


For someone who a according to you has it made in the shade you are one angry dude. I used to say money can’t buy you happiness but it can buy you a big ole yacht and you can sail right up next to it. Looks like it got you got a dingy with a leak. 
 

That sounded angry to you? Once again, you are wrong! That’s one thing you are good at! ? There’s a smiley face for you! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Q-baby! said:

That sounded angry to you? Once again, you are wrong! That’s one thing you are good at! ? There’s a smiley face for you! 


Yes. In the real world where normal people reside telling someone to Shut The ***** Up is classic anger.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...