Koko78 Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 9 hours ago, IDBillzFan said: This is why the left is such a mess. Full denial. Holy crap, she is such a ***** moron. She's actually competition for AOC in the dumbshittery division of Congress. 'America knows, that just because the jury finds a Republican not guilty, that they're actually still guilty, because it was a rigged trial, and we all know that people should call witnesses to prove their innocence, and America knows that.' vs. 'Like, President, you know, Trump, totally, like, you know, like, totally quitted today and stuff!' Eh, ***** it. They're both flaming re.tards.
Nanker Posted February 8, 2020 Author Posted February 8, 2020 Mr. Vindman should be courts martialed. . 2
CoudyBills Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 9 hours ago, Q-baby! said: Thank you for the confirmation! You have a negative IQ. It makes sense. So hurtful. Who hurt you Q? Did daddy touch you down there?
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 15 hours ago, B-Man said: We’ll probably see the usual two-step about this news on the Hill. Step one: Republicans in Congress say, “We shouldn’t assume the worst about the president’s motives. Maybe he removed Vindman for reasons other than retaliation.” Step two: Trump turns around this afternoon or tomorrow and flatly admits to reporters that it was retaliation. “The son of a B word testified against me. He had to go.” Then there’ll be some sort of halting step three. A sheepish “it’s not what I would have done” from the now-burned Susan Collins crowd, an enthusiastic “the son of a B word had to go” from the Matt Gaetz chorus. Why don’t they just skip steps one and two? You’d think they would have learned by now. Go straight to three. https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2020/02/07/alex-vindman-removed-nsc-post-escorted-white-house/ . .....waiting for MSM to chime in about Adolph Trump and the Vindman/Sondland "extermination"......
Doc Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 (edited) 7 hours ago, Nanker said: Mr. Vindman should be courts martialed. He should consider himself lucky if he isn’t. I wonder if (still) believes being a useful idiot for the Dems was worth it? Edited February 8, 2020 by Doc 2
/dev/null Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 7 hours ago, Nanker said: Mr. Vindman should be courts martialed. . 3 minutes ago, Doc said: He should consider himself lucky if he isn’t. I wonder if (still) believes being a useful idiot for the Dems was worth it? If Vindman had done this during a Democrat administration he would not have been fired or court martialed. he would have been arkancided 2
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 30 minutes ago, /dev/null said: If Vindman had done this during a Democrat administration he would not have been fired or court martialed. he would have been arkancided ...well yes, they are selective..........didn't an Arkansas judge recuse himself in the Hunter Biden support matter?......safety first......OSHA judiciary.....
Q-baby! Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 1 hour ago, CoudyBills said: So hurtful. Who hurt you Q? Did daddy touch you down there? No. I think you know who did though.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: No. I think you know who did though. .....I'd bet even Waste Management would decline picking you up on Monday morning.......something about "non-contributory dialogue wasting space in their trucks"...hmm....
Keukasmallies Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 (edited) One strand of the impeachment fallout is Trump's firing of two staffers who testified against him. Given the atmosphere where the administration is being attacked from several sides, I have no problem with his sending these folks down the road. Does the media really think Trump should just scold them then elicit a promise from them, "not to do it again"? I'm sure the fired folk will find a warm welcome among the wound lickers. Edited February 8, 2020 by Keukasmallies 3
njbuff Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 Trump knew that there were holdovers from the Obama administration that would love nothing more but to take Trump down by any means if they were kept on. Trump should have fired all of the holdover bozos and start from scratch. We gotta give Trump some blame on that front.
Q-baby! Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 4 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: .....I'd bet even Waste Management would decline picking you up on Monday morning.......something about "non-contributory dialogue wasting space in their trucks"...hmm.... Good one!
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, njbuff said: Trump knew that there were holdovers from the Obama administration that would love nothing more but to take Trump down by any means if they were kept on. Trump should have fired all of the holdover bozos and start from scratch. We gotta give Trump some blame on that front. Acknowledging Trump's weaknesses is fair game to be sure. However, it seems that it would be nearly impossible to sweep the floor clean and empty the septic tank under the best of circumstances, and given what he had dealt with since day one, there are only so many moles you can whack. 1
njbuff Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Acknowledging Trump's weaknesses is fair game to be sure. However, it seems that it would be nearly impossible to sweep the floor clean and empty the septic tank under the best of circumstances, and given what he had dealt with since day one, there are only so many moles you can whack. I understand that Trump was probably up against it, but it also shows the Deep State is MUCH BIGGER than any of us thought. 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 Just now, njbuff said: I understand that Trump was probably up against it, but it also shows the Deep State is MUCH BIGGER than any of us thought. I think the challenge is that by the very nature of self-preservation, virtually every person who works in government has skin in the game and most of Trump's policies go counter to their instincts. That includes well-intentioned people of all political leanings who when push comes to shove, are at best apathetic to targets on Trump's agenda.
Capco Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 9 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I think the challenge is that by the very nature of self-preservation, virtually every person who works in government has skin in the game and most of Trump's policies go counter to their instincts. That includes well-intentioned people of all political leanings who when push comes to shove, are at best apathetic to targets on Trump's agenda. So if there was a wide scale purge of the government led by Trump, you'd be all for that right?
Deranged Rhino Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Capco said: So if there was a wide scale purge of the government led by Trump, you'd be all for that right? Backed by evidence w due process, yup. 1 1
Capco Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Backed by evidence w due process, yup. Where would you draw the line (or like the line to be drawn) with respect to treason specifically? What kind of acts amount to treason? If entire organizations are to blame for treason, at what point in their hierarchy do the punishments in this purge stop falling downhill? Is "I was just doing my job" going to be a good enough defense for a basic intel analyst, for example?
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 8, 2020 Posted February 8, 2020 6 minutes ago, Capco said: So if there was a wide scale purge of the government led by Trump, you'd be all for that right? define wide scale, define purge, and let me know what you think i meant by well-intentioned people. i'll be happy to reply.
Recommended Posts