Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Reed83HOF

good read on how the Yanks slowly turned things around by building a better culture in the early 90s - fits in to what McBeane is doing here

Recommended Posts

The McBeane myth making has reached even dizzier heights...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CardinalScotts said:

the guys who discount culture typically never played athletics. its real yes winning fuels it but winning for a year doesn't build  it. There is much more to it and that the part some guys don't get. Being accountable to each other, playing for  someone besides yourself- if you don't get there you will only practice and play to what your mood/motivation is that day. If you can get where you play for each other not letting the others down motivates you. Again if you haven't been around athletics at a descent level you won't get it. (This is Schopp- Howie and Jeremy not an athletic bone in any of them

 

Yep

 

Ask the Red Sox

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

Being a Bills and Yankees fan is about as big of a contrast as you can have.

Tell me about it. I expect excellence on one team and hope for a small degree of basic competence on the other...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, klos63 said:

But while Steinbrenner was suspended, they front office used that time to make smart moves to build the dynasty that George likely wouldn't have gone along with.

 

The A’s and Jays were pooped out after dominance for awhile, Collusion helped both a lot

 

Yankees stepped right in for 1994, perfect timing

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, CardinalScotts said:

the guys who discount culture typically never played athletics. its real yes winning fuels it but winning for a year doesn't build  it. There is much more to it and that the part some guys don't get. Being accountable to each other, playing for  someone besides yourself- if you don't get there you will only practice and play to what your mood/motivation is that day. If you can get where you play for each other not letting the others down motivates you. Again if you haven't been around athletics at a descent level you won't get it. (This is Schopp- Howie and Jeremy not an athletic bone in any of them

 

33 minutes ago, inaugural balls said:

 

Yep

 

Ask the Red Sox

 

Or the Bills of the SB era....

Edited by Mr. WEO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Gugny said:

 

Borderline criminal.  I hope he ends up with the Mets.

Why would you want to sack the current Met coach? The Mets are the surprise team in the league that has made a dramatic and stunning turn around. They were mocked when they acquired Stroman because most experts felt that they should have been dealing off their better players to get prospects. In the recent series with the Nationals in front of pack houses they won the series in closely fought games. Why rock the boat when it has been stabilized? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JohnC said:

Why would you want to sack the current Met coach? The Mets are the surprise team in the league that has made a dramatic and stunning turn around. They were mocked when they acquired Stroman because most experts felt that they should have been dealing off their better players to get prospects. In the recent series with the Nationals in front of pack houses they won the series in closely fought games. Why rock the boat when it has been stabilized? 

 

I will not partake in your jinx attempt.

  • Haha (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

I will not partake in your jinx attempt.

You are acting like WGR's Howard Simon. He is a neurotic Met fan when they lose and when they win. For some unique people one's instability can be one's stability. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing this! 

 

Mattingly was my hero growing up a Yankee fan in the late 80s.  

 

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy to say that team X built their culture and that's why they won after the team has completed a dynastic run. In the end the Yankees acquired talent both in a home grown variety and with volatile mercenaries thought that late 90's run. Talent almost above all else wins games. Yes having a good culture is a positive thing esp for sustained winning. But you can have a great culture but if you fail to develop and acquire talent then its a wrap no matter how professional and good your environment is. 

 

Many of the Phil Jackson coached Lakers and Bulls teams had a very volatile mix of players and personalities who disliked each other and yet they won 11 title included 3 threepeats in a 13 year period. The Yankees Bronx zoo won two titles and the players actively hated each other. In the end it always comes down to finding the right players at the right time putting them in the proper system to have success. 

 

It's two parts intelligence and one part luck (maybe two parts luck in football.) Culture is important I think more winning has been done with good cultures and talent than with just pure volatile talent. But I think comparing one team to another looks a bit silly as in the end talent is what it mostly comes down to. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, the D3 superstars are here to tell us how culture trumps talent in professional sports.

 

🤯 

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JohnC said:

You are acting like WGR's Howard Simon. He is a neurotic Met fan when they lose and when they win. For some unique people one's instability can be one's stability. :)

 

Dammit, John!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Don't complain...........if Big Stein wasn't complicit in collusion in the 80's then early 90''s Blue Jays never win a WS.    Broadly, not bidding on coveted pitchers cost the Yankees a lot of top pitching options.  Specifically the Yankees refusing to bid on Jack Morris multiple times is what fueled the investigation into collusion and the 1992 Jays don't win without Jack.

 

 

 

 

Morris, Kirk Gibson, Tim Raines all in their prime would have put in pinstripes in a heartbeat 

 

3 hours ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said:

Costanza calling out Steinbrenner and his massive ego is where I think the organization finally got on the straight and narrow.

 

Frank Constanza did a better job with Big Stein (voice was Larry David) forgetting his son was missing for days.

 

 

3 hours ago, klos63 said:

But while Steinbrenner was suspended, they front office used that time to make smart moves to build the dynasty that George likely wouldn't have gone along with.

 

Every good team made interesting trades that weren’t ripoffs as they couldn’t sign free agents.

 

Yankees showed up as the best teams fizzled, just like Jordan had to wait for the Celtics and then the Pistons to fall apart from old age before he could win

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, row_33 said:

Yankees showed up as the best teams fizzled, just like Jordan had to wait for the Celtics and then the Pistons to fall apart from old age before he could win

 

It isn't that simple.  The Celtics and Pistons got older and the Bulls around MJ got much better and more mature.  It's never as black and white as people make it out to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, JohnC said:

You are acting like WGR's Howard Simon. He is a neurotic Met fan when they lose and when they win. For some unique people one's instability can be one's stability. :)

 

Because he knows the Mets are a false hope in a lousy division.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, CardinalScotts said:

the guys who discount culture typically never played athletics. its real yes winning fuels it but winning for a year doesn't build  it. There is much more to it and that the part some guys don't get. Being accountable to each other, playing for  someone besides yourself- if you don't get there you will only practice and play to what your mood/motivation is that day. If you can get where you play for each other not letting the others down motivates you. Again if you haven't been around athletics at a descent level you won't get it. (This is Schopp- Howie and Jeremy not an athletic bone in any of them

 

No different than the culture at companies and why some succeed or fail when seemingly they are doing the exact same things in the ssme markets

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Because he knows the Mets are a false hope in a lousy division.

They did recently turn it around and give their fans some hope not only for the present but also the future. When you have the surge that they did by winning 16 out 18 games (around that #) that isn't a mirage. It is a reality that their recently near capacity crowds appreciate. Winning is winning. Don't sneer at it. Let the neurotic fans like Gugny have a scintilla of hope. He deserves it for all the punishment he has absorbed following them. 

  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JohnC said:

They did recently turn it around and give their fans some hope not only for the present but also the future. When you have the surge that they did by winning 16 out 18 games (around that #) that isn't a mirage. It is a reality that their recently near capacity crowds appreciate. Winning is winning. Don't sneer at it. Let the neurotic fans like Gugny have a scintilla of hope. He deserves it for all the punishment he has absorbed following them. 

 

I'm a Yankees fan. They will ALWAYS be the rejected red headed stepchild in my eyes.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Because he knows the Mets are a false hope in a lousy division.

 

The division is, indeed, lousy.  More importantly, the entire NL is weak with the exception of a couple teams.  That's why they're in the hunt. 

 

It would be nice, however, to play the Orioles 50 times/season like the Yankees do.  Home or away, they're playing in little league fields.

 

The fact of the matter is that the Mets are just as likely to get into the World Series as the Yankees are.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, JohnC said:

They did recently turn it around and give their fans some hope not only for the present but also the future. When you have the surge that they did by winning 16 out 18 games (around that #) that isn't a mirage. It is a reality that their recently near capacity crowds appreciate. Winning is winning. Don't sneer at it. Let the neurotic fans like Gugny have a scintilla of hope. He deserves it for all the punishment he has absorbed following them. 

They got a tough stretch the next month or so starting tonight against the Braves. 

 

Interested to see how they do these next 3 games. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...