Jump to content

The Menace of Populist Authoritarianism


Recommended Posts

I was encouraged to start a thread in PPP.  Here's nifty one.  Try to look past by the source and to the substance.  Thoughts from the Main PPP Partisan Shills.  I better not get a PPP STD... Ah, WTF, a little burning and green pee never hurt anyone... And it's fun;

 

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/12/10/18126132/trump-populism-democracy-threat-minority-rule

 

 

Dangerous demagoguery.  Ruling by a gerrymandering monority.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The most egregious examples are playing out right now in states ranging from North Carolina to Michigan to Wisconsin, where the GOP increasingly has an answer to the problem of what you do if you lose elections — ignore the outcome and just change the rules to avoid giving up power.

 

Mmmm...What other party has a habit of doing that?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I support gerrymandering because I despise universal suffrage. Most liberals don't deserve to vote, so denying them an impact makes perfect sense to me. 

Anybody ever notice how the bill of rights don't say nothin about voting? There's a reason for that. Allowing everybody to vote was never something the founders wanted because they knew better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had heard that in these two states (at a minimum) Wisconsin, Michigan GOP state lawmakers look to limit powers of new Democratic governors.

 

Republican-led legislatures in Wisconsin and Michigan in lame duck sessions are aiming to limit the powers of incoming Democratic governors in their states, prompting sore loser allegations from opponents who say lawmakers are undermining voters. But the moves also raise broader questions about whether such efforts have become the new normal in a political environment in which state bodies are becoming more partisan--and more powerful.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wisconsin-michigan-gop-state-lawmakers-look-to-limit-powers-of-new-democratic-governors/

 

And people say the Democrats are a pile of **** 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

I was encouraged to start a thread in PPP.  Here's nifty one.  Try to look past by the source and to the substance.  Thoughts from the Main PPP Partisan Shills.  I better not get a PPP STD... Ah, WTF, a little burning and green pee never hurt anyone... And it's fun;

 

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/12/10/18126132/trump-populism-democracy-threat-minority-rule

 

 

Dangerous demagoguery.  Ruling by a gerrymandering monority.

 

 

 

I wish the writer could have complained about the electoral college sooner in the article.  That would have saved me some time reading down to that before stopping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

I had heard that in these two states (at a minimum) Wisconsin, Michigan GOP state lawmakers look to limit powers of new Democratic governors.

 

Republican-led legislatures in Wisconsin and Michigan in lame duck sessions are aiming to limit the powers of incoming Democratic governors in their states, prompting sore loser allegations from opponents who say lawmakers are undermining voters. But the moves also raise broader questions about whether such efforts have become the new normal in a political environment in which state bodies are becoming more partisan--and more powerful.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wisconsin-michigan-gop-state-lawmakers-look-to-limit-powers-of-new-democratic-governors/

 

And people say the Democrats are a pile of **** 

 

vox. all the lols


Edit: also note that while "liberal" western europe decays and burns, Poland and Hungary are peaceful and prospering. And if that idiot thinks the President's policies aren't popular, he's gravely mistaken.

 

 

Edited by Joe in Winslow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry EII this is not a very good topic and that you have the intellects of Shady trying to shift your argument to shift the narrative to that which was the aim of the Vox article is proof positive.

 

Low IQ folks can't help but to create the strawmen theory that folks like Shady are attempting to do from the strawman theory proposed by the author of the article.

 

Hence, it should not be reasonably argued. 

 

Edit. I read the article because I had to *****.  What a racist piece of ***** article.  The main jist: black people commit more crimes and can't vote once felons so we need to let black felons vote so they vote Democrat because they're more likely to vote Democrat. Holy ?, Batman. That's a great argument.

 

The rest was talking about restrictions to authoritarian governments (governors) which is hilarious because on a federal level it is the desire to do that to Trump and reinstore state rights which is something that was attempted a hundred years ago and resisted by the Democrats. That Trump has reversed the entire course of Democratic ideologies shows the baseless platform liberals stand on and the Bastian of hypocrisy that they have showing that liberalism is a form of retardation and should be treated as such.  It's quite disgusting that #orangemanbad is the alchemist of change in to a party which once set the social tones of revolution.

Edited by Boyst62
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

I support gerrymandering because I despise universal suffrage. Most liberals don't deserve to vote, so denying them an impact makes perfect sense to me. 

Anybody ever notice how the bill of rights don't say nothin about voting? There's a reason for that. Allowing everybody to vote was never something the founders wanted because they knew better. 

Liberals are generally more educated, tolerant and in possession of human capital than Conservatives. Why wouldn't you want the betters to vote? 

1 hour ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

I was encouraged to start a thread in PPP.  Here's nifty one.  Try to look past by the source and to the substance.  Thoughts from the Main PPP Partisan Shills.  I better not get a PPP STD... Ah, WTF, a little burning and green pee never hurt anyone... And it's fun;

 

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/12/10/18126132/trump-populism-democracy-threat-minority-rule

 

 

Dangerous demagoguery.  Ruling by a gerrymandering monority.

 

 

The courts have so far done a fine job at protecting the rule of law in this country. Not just during this illiberal period of "populism" but through our relatively recent history--I'm thinking in over turing Jim Crow. I'd like to think both left and right judges will continue this. 

 

I'd like to think that the last election helped us over the hump of them having all the power. I mean if they were going to cement their rule, there was the chance, right? Most of the people in the country are good people. Trump and the Tea Party Republicans have since 2010 relied on the apathy of the electorate but once they saw how bad Trump was--and his GOP enablers--the good people showed up at the polls and said enough. Dems had a 10% advantage in the past election, yet many of those voters had voted Republican in the past. So I'd like to think that there are enough good people in the country to stop a situation from installing a wicked minority to dominate. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

Does anyone remember Ballot Box 13?

 

As far as gerrymandering goes and what's happening now, this is a great read on how it is presently working.  And, it's all legal.  (The actual book, not the revue).

 

https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/david-daley/ratfked/

NC is a foothold for this argument because it's been a solid blue state for so long that now it's been lost and the attempts to regain balance by redistricting have caused an uproar at the reality we are now red. Save for Mecklenburg, Wake, a few other ***** counties and the tiny blip that is the city of Asheville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Liberals are generally more educated, tolerant and in possession of human capital than Conservatives. Why wouldn't you want the betters to vote? 

 

That's hilarious. "betters" I mean that is seriously ROTFLMAO.

 

What you're referring to is what I call the "Marthas Vineyard" liberal. Idiots who couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag, and couldnt change their own flat. Helpless idiots. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The_Dude said:

 

That's hilarious. "betters" I mean that is seriously ROTFLMAO.

 

What you're referring to is what I call the "Marthas Vineyard" liberal. Idiots who couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag, and couldnt change their own flat. Helpless idiots. 

 

Yet they live in wealthy Martha's Vineyards! They can hire someone to change a flat. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

That's hilarious. "betters" I mean that is seriously ROTFLMAO.

 

What you're referring to is what I call the "Marthas Vineyard" liberal. Idiots who couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag, and couldnt change their own flat. Helpless idiots. 

 

Something like the Marine in the commercial who claims that the leak in his water heater "rocked his world". I guess it changed his world forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The resistance to Trump — the largest and most powerful social movement in generations — needs to enter a more radical stage that goes beyond electoral advocacy to include civil disobedience and direct action.

 

The "largest and most powerful social movement in generations" - ignoring the rebellion of flyover country that elected Trump to start with - needs to become more terroristic.  ***** brilliant.  "Direct action?"  Really?  Literally, a call to revolution.  

 

Sorry, I'm not taking that story at all seriously.  

31 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Liberals are generally more educated, tolerant and in possession of human capital than Conservatives.

 

More educated, tolerant...and own slaves?

 

***** you, ***** ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

More educated, tolerant...and own slaves?

 

***** you, ***** ball.

 

Slavery was a universally accepted practice until modernity. I fault no race, religion, or whatever for slavery. It was/is a universal practice. 

 

...which is why I love the American black attitude that slavery was some great injustice suffered only to blacks. 

Edited by The_Dude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...