B-Man Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, peace out said: Prominent right wingers all over Twitter and Fox news are convinced this is a false flag and have zero evidence for that assumption. This is how conspiracies start and spread. It's wild fire. That would be a good post to attach a link to.................... ALL Explosive Devices Linked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 Interesting how none of the packages look to have been processed by the postal service. So a number of people throughout the country hand-delivered these? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 7 minutes ago, peace out said: Prominent right wingers all over Twitter and Fox news are convinced this is a false flag and have zero evidence for that assumption. This is how conspiracies start and spread. It's wild fire. It's just the standard operating procedure now 2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: No political figure has to die to work their base into a froth. This is not Central Europe circa 1914. Or USA 1919! www.legendsofamerica.com The 1919 United States anarchist bombings were a series ofbombings and attempted bombings carried out by the Italian anarchist followers of Luigi Galleani from April through June1919. These bombings led to the Red Scare of 1919–20. 1919 United States anarchist bombings - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1919_United_States_anarchist_bombings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBills808 Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 1 minute ago, RochesterRob said: No political figure has to die to work their base into a froth. This is not Central Europe circa 1914. Fallacy of equivocation. The main reason I don't post here much anymore. Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 1 minute ago, B-Man said: That would be a good post to attach a link to.................... ALL Explosive Devices Linked... Candace Owens Rush Limbaugh (on air, not on Twitter) Bill Mitchell Ann Coulter Wayne Dupree to name a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 8 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Prominent left wingers all over Twitter, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, CNN, NYT, WAPO are convinced this a right wing-extremist and have zerio evidence for that assumption. This is how conspiracies start and spread. It's wild fire! MSNBC Brings on Hillary Aide to Blame Trump for Mail Bombs 'View' Suggests Right Responsible: ‘Fox News Hasn't Gotten a Bomb!' 1 minute ago, peace out said: Candace Owens Rush Limbaugh (on air, not on Twitter) Bill Mitchell Ann Coulter Wayne Dupree to name a few. Those are not links................... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: Those are not links................... They are to those who deal in conspiracies. Poor Cuomo...can he get anything right? Edited October 24, 2018 by LABillzFan 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 5 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Fallacy of equivocation. The main reason I don't post here much anymore. Carry on. You should be posting more, imo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 32 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Simply put, if this were a political stunt from a group as truly evil as some would like to portray the 'left', these bombs would have detonated and killed their intended recipients. Simply put, you're allowing the narrative to explain the facts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 15 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Again, if the goal of this was truly to engender political support, they would have been dead. That's the logical conclusion if you buy the conspiracythink. There is no goodwill to be gained from having a few pipebombs get blocked by the Post Office security screening. it may be that you are two steps ahead in the thought process with regard here. it is conceivable that this is merely the precursor. the precursor attempting to see if they can sway public opinion without having to injure one of their own. if it doesn't work, then yes, your scenario comes into focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 Just now, B-Man said: MSNBC Brings on Hillary Aide to Blame Trump for Mail Bombs 'View' Suggests Right Responsible: ‘Fox News Hasn't Gotten a Bomb!' Those are not links................... . Anything for you. Go Bona Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 31 minutes ago, Foxx said: you do realize that that image is from CNN, right? lmao Sorta confirms that it is fake news then, eh? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Fallacy of equivocation. The main reason I don't post here much anymore. Carry on. You are just attempting to obfuscate. Let us just work on "a political figure does not need to die to work their base into a froth." Why does such a figure need to die? This is your assertion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 30 minutes ago, peace out said: It's certainly an image of that flag. I would guess it's a red herring. Red? what, are you color blind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 Oh gees, hope the bombers didn't read this one! The Fed might be next Quote President Donald Trump delivered some of his most pointed attacks yet on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell on Tuesday, calling the central bank the “biggest risk” to the U.S. economy. In an Oval Office interview with The Wall Street Journal, Trump said Powell “almost looks like he’s happy raising interest rates.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 (edited) 48 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Um... ? How is this not being reported? If I was Clinton I'd send my broken sexual device back to Amazon. *** "Sexual device" because my actual word was filtered Edited October 24, 2018 by Joe Miner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBills808 Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: You are just attempting to obfuscate. Let us just work on "a political figure does not need to die to work their base into a froth." Why does such a figure need to die? This is your assertion. No. I'm pointing out the incongruity between the assertion that this was a politically motivated false flag and its potential risk/reward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 24, 2018 Share Posted October 24, 2018 Quote But what we can say is this: Given what Trump has done and said, this was absolutely predictable. In fact, it’s a wonder that it took this long. It’s not just that Trump advocates violence against his political opponents — though he does. It’s that everything about his rhetoric pushes his supporters in that direction, even if the overwhelming majority will never get quite to the point where they’ll actually commit this kind of act of terrorism. The first is Trump’s explicit celebration of violence against political opponents. He lauds a violent assault a Republican congressman committed against a reporter who had the temerity to ask about health-care policy. When confronted with protesters, he regularly talks about the violent retribution he would like to visit against them. Some samples: “I’d like to punch him in the face.” “Maybe he should have been roughed up.” “Part of the problem, and part of the reason it takes so long, is nobody wants to hurt each other anymore, right?” There is simply no question that Trump has repeatedly sent the message to his supporters that politically motivated violence is not a violation of proper behavior and ideals, but instead is perfectly appropriate if you detest the person against whom you’re committing that violence. Second, Trump regularly says that ordinary legal procedures and systems are inadequate to mete out the harsh punishment that those who oppose him deserve. While every politician has changes he or she would like to make to one law or another, Trump has undertaken a sustained assault on the very idea that we have a legal system that should be respected even if it produces outcomes you don’t like. Trump spins out wild stories about “deep state” conspiracies against him. He complains that immigration laws prevent the harsh treatment he’d like to deliver to immigrants, and that libel laws unfairly prevent him from suing reporters for criticizing him. He encourages his crowds, even two years after the 2016 election, to shout “Lock her up!” at the mention of Hillary Clinton’s name. By now his red-faced supporters have probably forgotten what imagined crime she was supposed to have committed; all they know is that she opposed Trump, so she should be tossed behind bars. Third — and this is vitally important — Trump paints for his supporters an apocalyptic picture of the horrors Democrats want to bring to the United States, presenting the most horrific fantasies as fact. That picture is so terrifying that if you were to actually believe it, violence against Democrats might be a perfectly appropriate response. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/wp/2018/10/24/three-interpretations-of-trumps-nationalist-rhetoric/?utm_term=.a655064455db Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts