Jump to content

Trump Wants To Regulate Google


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

Dearest Don wants to regulate ALL negative press about him... 

 

Just what kind of leader(s) want to "silence" the media??? 

 

Comment on this please. 

 

 

This stuff works on impressionable booger eaters like yourself.  

 

Edited by Teddy KGB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BeginnersMind said:

Here’s what the gov can do to fix social media:

 

- remove the autoplay feature from YouTube,

- end infinite scrolling on Twitter and Facebook feeds,

- limit scrolling time to three-minute sessions,

- set default limits on the use of platforms to 30 minutes a day, 

- outlaw Snapchat streaks (rewards for consecutive days of contact with friends) and most “gamification” (badges, rewards) for any online service,

- require an FTC report to Congress describing how internet companies “interfere with free choices of individuals” by “exploiting human psychology and brain physiology.” 

 

Get r done. 

 

 

 

 

 

Were you going to attribute any of these bullet points to a bill that was introduced by Josh Hawley?

 

And you continue to wonder why now you have zero respect here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, /dev/null said:

 

While they're at it, maybe they can regulate loot boxes so all players get a minimum number of sweet l3wtz.  And membership of a raid guarantees a minimum number of Epic and Legendary items

 

Take your welfare epics/legendaries and stuff them, you commie!

 

RNG for life!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

More insight less incite 

 

Ok, ignore the second statement.

 

Just answer why did Twitter block #ClintonBodyCount trends but is allowing #TrumpBodyCount to trend?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Ok, ignore the second statement.

 

Just answer why did Twitter block #ClintonBodyCount trends but is allowing #TrumpBodyCount to trend?  

 

I have no idea.  The only twitter I follow is sports related. 

 

IMO Twitter is full of clueless idiots spewing trash w/o a care of their ramifications. 

 

And honestly do you expect Donald Trump Junior to not support his dad? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

I have no idea.  The only twitter I follow is sports related. 

 

IMO Twitter is full of clueless idiots spewing trash w/o a care of their ramifications. 

 


You're not wrong there.

The original point being that some hashtags are suppressed when they favor the right or disparage the left.  There is also a lot of problems with people being given time-outs for the same reasons. Twitter is anything but unbiased, and all its bias skews one way, and one way only. 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

I have no idea.  The only twitter I follow is sports related. 

 

IMO Twitter is full of clueless idiots spewing trash w/o a care of their ramifications. 

 

And honestly do you expect Donald Trump Junior to not support his dad? 

 

What in tarnations are you talking about ? 

 

You dont use twitter.   The rest of the world does.  

 

This is painfully stupid content.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

I have no idea.  The only twitter I follow is sports related. 

 

IMO Twitter is full of clueless idiots spewing trash w/o a care of their ramifications. 

 

And honestly do you expect Donald Trump Junior to not support his dad? 

 

Don't run away from the question.

 

Why do Twitter's "impartial" moderators allow one topic trend and suppress a nearly identical topic?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GG said:

 

 

Were you going to attribute any of these bullet points to a bill that was introduced by Josh Hawley?

 

Only in the WSJ article link that was in my post, and noting that this was an R proposal in a later reply.  

 

Quote

And you continue to wonder why now you have zero respect here.

 

I value your contributions here. You're probably the most positive contributor to PPP. 

Edited by BeginnersMind
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BeginnersMind said:

 

Only in the WSJ article link that was in my post, and noting that this was an R proposal in a later reply.  

 

 

I value your contributions here. You're probably the most positive contributor to PPP. 

 

You mean the link embedded in the tiny "r" in your post?  How about citing the proposed bill in the body of your post?

 

I'd say the response is disingenuous at best, and slimy in its true form, especially when you know that was your intent.  Keep thinking that you are a fair arbiter.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

You mean the link embedded in the tiny "r" in your post?  How about citing the proposed bill in the body of your post?

 

My "goal" was sarcasm that I would support such nonsense. 

 

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

I'd say the response is disingenuous at best, and slimy in its true form, especially when you know that was your intent.  Keep thinking that you are a fair arbiter.

 

Sarcasm is slimy? I only wish this board operated at such a high level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BeginnersMind said:

 

My "goal" was sarcasm that I would support such nonsense. 

 

 

Sarcasm is slimy? I only wish this board operated at such a high level. 

 

Funny how when people get called out they fall back on sarcasm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Funny how when people get called out they fall back on sarcasm.  

 

The sarcasm was in the original post, not your "call out" where I pointed out that I linked to the article in the R. Given that this is a thread about regulating tech companies, it seemed like the right place. Nice that you take no stance on the bill. 

 

Please send me your posting rulebook. (I was serious about you being a poster I admire and still do but that last statement is sarcasm since you seem to want an indicator.)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

Healthcare is a right.  Alliance & Horde should provide free bandages, healz, and rez's


I've read medical studies that say red wine is good for you,  ergo,  red wine = medical care.

Now, were's my free wine? ? ?  

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

The sarcasm was in the original post, not your "call out" where I pointed out that I linked to the article in the R. Given that this is a thread about regulating tech companies, it seemed like the right place. Nice that you take no stance on the bill. 

 

Please send me your posting rulebook. (I was serious about you being a poster I admire and still do but that last statement is sarcasm since you seem to want an indicator.)  

 

Yes it's clear that you're now claiming that your original post was sarcastic in nature, even though you deceptively posed it as if it was your opinion.

 

If you wanted to engage in a real discussion (which you almost never do anymore) you would have been more open in your intent.

 

My views on regulating tech have been very clear, and selfishly, I would focus on areas where Tech is wittingly and unwittingly exploiting kids.  I started a thread on this topic and have continually pointed out that Tech's designation of 13-year olds as adults in the online world was a grave error that needs to be addressed ASAP.  And I didn't need to hide behind a weak sarcasm attempt to engage in the discussion.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, /dev/null said:

 

While they're at it, maybe they can regulate loot boxes so all players get a minimum number of sweet l3wtz.  And membership of a raid guarantees a minimum number of Epic and Legendary items

 

Bonus points given for the color coding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GG said:

 

Funny how when people get called out they fall back on sarcasm.  

 

Let me repeat myself.    Too many people here  (not only in the PPP) do not get sarcasm. 

 

Then,  when said people don't get the joke / sarcasm they blame the OP.  

 

 

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I've read medical studies that say red wine is good for you,  ergo,  red wine = medical care.

Now, were's my free wine? ? ?  

 

Replace dope with wine and I'm in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

Let me repeat myself.    Too many people here  (not only in the PPP) do not get sarcasm. 

 

Then,  when said people don't get the joke / sarcasm they blame the OP.  

 

 

 

Yeah, that must be the reason.  Has nothing at all to do with a poster's voluminous posting history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

FTC Chief Says He’s Willing to Break Up Big Tech Companies
 

* Chairman Simons says FTC can unwind approved deals over harm
* FTC is investigating Facebook acquisitions in antitrust probe

 

The head of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission said he’s prepared to break up major technology platforms if necessary by undoing their past mergers as his agency investigates whether companies including Facebook Inc. are harming competition.
 

</snip>
 

“If you have to, you do it,” Simons said about breaking up tech companies. “It’s not ideal because it’s very messy. But if you have to you have to.”
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google having 950 pages of documents turned in seems hardly noteworthy.

 

They must easily study many millions of sheets of data daily.

 

By posting this I'm likely now on an upgraded monitoring list than a sec ago.

 

Edited by I am the egg man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, I am the egg man said:

Google turning over 950 pages of documents seems hardly noteworthy.

 

They must easily study many millions of sheets of data daily.

 

I'm bet by posting this I'm now on a monitoring list.

 

 

Depends on what 950 documents were turned over. More importantly, however, is what's on the laptop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Depends on what 950 documents were turned over. More importantly, however, is what's on the laptop.

Geez, some of you are so fast too pounce.

 

I always need to re-read my post after I put it out there for mistakes and before I can edit "swoosh" !

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Was just a matter of time.   Anyone who’s set foot in any tech university knows they’re hardly a bastion of liberalism. Someone probably got fed up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...