Jump to content

President Donald J. Trump's Supreme Court Associate Justice Kavanaugh


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Boca BIlls said:

Lol so it isnt about a guy doing this **** to women it is about being bait for Democrats... 

 

I don't know if he did or didn't. Classic he said she said.  There ARE two sides to every story.  But it does seem to be a little under handed (sitting on letter 2 months, Avenetti of all peoplefinding new victims) which makes me suspicious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Azalin said:

Sorry, but I disagree completely. If Kavanaugh gets sunk, then the left is only going to be emboldened in their attacks. They will be every bit as vociferous, if not worse, with whoever else gets nominated. They need to be defeated.

 

And if the R's don't vote for him, their base won't come out to vote for them in November.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Commsvet11 said:

 

Your reaching, I don’t care for 80s hair metal bands, I don’t listen to them, but even I heard a few megadeaths songs. 

Take opera for an example, you may not listen to it, but you have heard Wagner’s Ride of the Valkyries 

dun dun dun da da da, dun dun dun da da da .... see it’s in your head

 

You know who else heard Wagner - Hitler!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 I was reading earlier Swetnick was sued for defamation. I cannot find the results of that action though. Anyone?

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/Independentvo16/status/1045106986919112704

 

and she made a sexual harassment complaint before (Debra Katz's firm represented her)

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1045094799936761856

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 I was reading earlier Swetnick was sued for defamation. I cannot find the results of that action though. Anyone?

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/Independentvo16/status/1045106986919112704

 

and she made a sexual harassment complaint before (Debra Katz's firm represented her)

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1045094799936761856

 

 

 

 

 

 

From everything I've seen, she seems to have Borderline Personality Disorder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 I was reading earlier Swetnick was sued for defamation. I cannot find the results of that action though. Anyone?

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/Independentvo16/status/1045106986919112704

 

and she made a sexual harassment complaint before (Debra Katz's firm represented her)

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1045094799936761856

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gosh you'd think the dems would be wise enough to have these accusers represented by fresh attorneys new to the scene. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bbb said:

 

I thought I was keeping up with this.  What the hell does a Gorsuch letter signify?

 

Same accusations (same letter), but against Gorsuch, by the same person.

 

This has been rumored almost from the start though. I guess we will see soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

Same accusations (same letter), but against Gorsuch, by the same person.

 

This has been rumored almost from the start though. I guess we will see soon enough.

 

Haha - wow.  That's one of the first things I'm finding hard to believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

They are both Trump haters and Flake is a RINO.

 

They are, but Flake has delusions of primary-ing Trump in 2020 which means he has to vote Yes or he'll be dead in the water. He knows that, which is why in his speech from the floor today he was very eel like in the way he vacillated between both sides of the issue. He's a yes barring a convincing turn from Ford tomorrow.

 

4 minutes ago, bbb said:

Haha - wow.  That's one of the first things I'm finding hard to believe. 

 

It's an incredible claim, for sure. I really don't know what to make of it other than like BG said, it's been rumored (from a lot of people on the Hill) from day one. If it does exist, and it does get revealed tomorrow, I'll be stunned... not by the fact that the letter exists but that the GOP was able to keep it from leaking. 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bbb said:

 

Haha - wow.  That's one of the first things I'm finding hard to believe. 

 

There is also a Facebook post of hers from Gorsuch's nomination saying something to the effect of "Why doesn't someone come forward with a fake rape accusation to stop this."  

 

Of course, the flip-side of that is to believe she's lying, you have to explain that she's been planning this since 2012 - which is beyond the realm of credulity.  Or that this is a conspiracy between three people at least - her, her husband, and their therapist, who all would have contributed to a fiction that she "remembered" this in therapy in 2012.  Which is only slightly less insane.  

 

And holy hell, if it does conclusively come out she made this whole thing up...instead of "highlighting the issue," she will have, with one high-profile lie, managed to damage the credibility of every rape victim in the country.  

9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They are, but Flake has delusions of primary-ing Trump in 2020 which means he has to vote Yes or he'll be dead in the water. He knows that, which is why in his speech from the floor today he was very eel like in the way he vacillated between both sides of the issue. He's a yes barring a convincing turn from Ford tomorrow.

 

 

It's an incredible claim, for sure. I really don't know what to make of it other than like BG said, it's been rumored (from a lot of people on the Hill) from day one. If it does exist, and it does get revealed tomorrow, I'll be stunned... not by the fact that the letter exists but that the GOP was able to keep it from leaking. 

 

 

 

 

One thing I don't have insight in to is how gossip is generated and spread on the Hill.  Almost all my experience, and that of everyone I know, is in the executive branch.  I know exactly one former House staffer...and he's a weasely little spud I'd rather not talk to again.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

So two men are talking to the judiciary committee that they are they guys that Ford is talking about. ? Just when you think things couldn't get any crazier..

 

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/1045146408318382080

 

I would be entirely unsurprised if this ended up being true.

 

I would also be entirely unsurprised if they were Republican plants intended to short-circuit the hearing tomorrow and make it easier to confirm Kavanaugh.

 

I would ALSO be entirely unsurprised if they were DEMOCRATIC plants intended to confuse things and delay the vote even MORE (because now there CLEARLY needs to be an FBI investigation, to figure out what's going on).  

 

What a complete !@#$ing clown show.  Or cluster!@#$.  A complete clownster!@#$.

 

 

And as an aside: there's going to be more calls for an FBI investigation.  Because now that we have two other guys confessing to the crime, it's certainly their job to investigate a crime not in their jurisdiction that Kavanaugh wasn't even involved in, for Kavanaugh's hearing.  :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...