3rdnlng Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 30 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That's stupid. Good character, bad character, but no character? It works for you with class. You have no class. Yes 5Watt, not only aren't you very bright but you have no character. None whatsoever. Nada. Zilch. Zero. I know you think it might be impossible to have no character but you could always turn your body over to science so they could check out this phenomena. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Prog-Fascists who don't realize they're prog-fascists are the most dangerous idiots out there.... In Blumenthal's defense, he's not an idiot. He's not smart, or honest enough to be classified as such. He's a deep state drone devoid of a spine, character, or integrity. He's a blight on the Hill and his party. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Hoax 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 36 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Emotional children who want immediate gratification but can't see beyond next Friday. That's all it is. Nothing else. Wait, is there something going on next Saturday that no one told me about? I haven't been out since that college party where some dude danced to a Gladys Knight song and whipped his Pip out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: ...picked by the Federalist Society for reasons we the people have no knowledge of... That's just because you the people are morons. Courts publicly publish opinions, hundreds of which were written by Judge Kavanaugh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 8 minutes ago, Koko78 said: That's just because you the people are morons. Courts publicly publish opinions, hundreds of which were written by Judge Kavanaugh. That doesn't tell us why the Federalist Society picked this guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That doesn't tell us why the Federalist Society picked this guy. Who gives a ****? Read his opinions and make your own decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You're correct and I know that. There are times though I just hit the wall understanding why someone would want something to play out like this. Surely they know the game gets escalated the next time, for their person. I try to wrap my head around those that love chaos and anarchy of this sort, but I just don't get it. When all is said and done, I just shake my head with the realization that for every person that makes the koolaid, there are still countless people out there willing to serve it to the people willing to drink it. Exactly, like Hillary and Benghazi. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Prog-fascists can't argue or defend their positions, so they often try to change topics or resort to poorly constructed "whataboutisms". Evidence above. They're driven solely by emotion and the sense they're "fighting evil" thus everything and anything is justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Who gives a ****? Read his opinions and make your own decisions. LOL, who cares about a life time appointment to the supreme court and how and why he got there? Ya, no one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Prog-fascists can't argue or defend their positions, so they often try to change topics or resort to poorly constructed "whataboutisms". Evidence above. They're driven solely by emotion and the sense they're "fighting evil" thus everything and anything is justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Is there any absolute reason at this point to think the accusers are lying? His buddy running away to hide so he doesn't have to testify is a bit suspicious. Brett's clerking for a known harasser, pervert and fired judge yet claiming to know nothing about his massive wrong doing is sort of disturbing, too. This is rich. I heard Kirsten Gillibrand yesterday come up with the classic, "if he didn't do anything, what does he have to hide" in regards to an FBI investigation. I didn't do anything either but I sure as heck don't want the FBI running around "interviewing" my relatives and friends on a witch hunt with ZERO evidence. Which brings up something I read yesterday. Didn' tthe FBI already do an exhaustive search of his background several times when they did the background check for his security clearances? The thing that always gets me on these things is, don't they realize they are setting a precedent that WILL be used against them in the not too distant future. Edited September 25, 2018 by reddogblitz 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Is there any absolute reason at this point to think the accusers are lying? His buddy running away to hide so he doesn't have to testify is a bit suspicious. Brett's clerking for a known harasser, pervert and fired judge yet claiming to know nothing about his massive wrong doing is sort of disturbing, too. Is there any absolute reason at this point to think they're telling the truth? Because the only ones making absolute statements are the ones that think they're telling the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 20 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: This is rich. I heard Kirsten Gillibrand yesterday come up with the classic, "if he didn't do anything, what does he have to hide" in regards to an FBI investigation. I didn't do anything either but I sure as heck don't want the FBI running around "interviewing" my relatives and friends on a witch hunt with ZERO evidence. Which brings up something I read yesterday. Didn' tthe FBI already do an exhaustive search of his background several times when they did the background check for his security clearances? The thing that always gets me on these things is, don't they realize they are setting a precedent that WILL be used against them in the not too distant future. Plus...they're not asking the FBI to do a further background check. They say that's what it is, but they're asking for a criminal investigation in to charges of rape and sexual assault. Having been through a few, on both sides of the table, and having had to answer for a criminal accusation in some of them, I know that you do not investigate criminal complaints in a background investigation. The investigators do an NCIC check, look for police reports and charges, compile them into an overall data package, and send them on for adjudication. They do NOT INVESTIGATE CHARGES THEY FIND, NOR DO THEY INITIATE NEW ONES, NOR DO THEY GO INTERVIEW WITNESSES AND VICTIMS TO ESTABLISH THE VERACITY OF THE CHARGES. That is NOT how things work. These accusations would actually be more effective if they were filed with the proper authorities, so they'd be properly investigated by the proper authorities AND properly recorded by the FBI for his background check. That they aren't doing so is very telling: they don't want the criminal justice system involved, because they know they can't come close to meeting a burden of proof, so they're trying the accusations - successfully - in the court of public opinion. Very Athenian...the boule leading the eccleasia in an ostracism. They should write their votes on pottery shards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You're correct and I know that. There are times though I just hit the wall understanding why someone would want something to play out like this. Surely they know the game gets escalated the next time, for their person. I try to wrap my head around those that love chaos and anarchy of this sort, but I just don't get it. When all is said and done, I just shake my head with the realization that for every person that makes the koolaid, there are still countless people out there willing to serve it to the people willing to drink it. I would point out though that making a circus out of SC justice appointments is pretty much only perpetrated by the Democrat party. Beginning with the Bork confirmation hearings, then Clarence Thomas, and now with Kavanaugh, they've gone all out to do whatever they can to smear each one of them. By contrast, every democrat appointment in my adult lifetime has faced nothing more in their confirmation hearings than the standard dog & pony questions, with a bit of partisan glowering and harrumphing thrown in for good measure. None that I can remember have actually had their character attacked or personal lives sullied like happens to republican nominees. The methods being used against Kavanaugh are nothing more than delay tactics. Outrageous, libelous, and disgusting, but still empty accusations. If the New York %&#$ing Times deems the accusations to be too flimsy to report, then that should be enough right there to stop the charade once & for all. This is nothing more than the radical left steering what little remains of the Democrats of old all the way into all-out TDS hysteria. They're no longer content with looking for things to be angry about, they're actually inventing them, and antifa, along with the rest of the fascist elements that call today's Democrats home are taking this all to a dangerous extreme. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 41 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: This is rich. I heard Kirsten Gillibrand yesterday come up with the classic, "if he didn't do anything, what does he have to hide" in regards to an FBI investigation. I didn't do anything either but I sure as heck don't want the FBI running around "interviewing" my relatives and friends on a witch hunt with ZERO evidence. Which brings up something I read yesterday. Didn' tthe FBI already do an exhaustive search of his background several times when they did the background check for his security clearances? The thing that always gets me on these things is, don't they realize they are setting a precedent that WILL be used against them in the not too distant future. I would say they are already acting on precedent. Hillary has been dragged through the mud forever, and people acting shocked this is happening are hypocrites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 (edited) 7 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Trump actually stated that she lied and should have went to the FBI? False accusations in one tweet and in an interview said that she should've called the FBI when the assault happened. Yeah. Edited September 25, 2018 by Doc Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 23 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Is there any absolute reason at this point to think they're telling the truth? Because the only ones making absolute statements are the ones that think they're telling the truth. So far, she is more credible that Kavenaugh who has repeatedly stretch the bounds of credulity in many of his answers on numerous topics and has not has his complete record released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts