Jump to content

Alonzo Highsmith explains why he flipped from Darnold to Mayfield


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chuck Wagon said:

Browns media / FO putting the spin cycle hard on Baker vs Darnold. MCK had a headline that “half the teams in the league had Baker #1”. Turns out she talked to 12 teams, supposedly 4 told her they had Baker #1 and she had a hunch 2 others did too. 

 

This is exactly the thing I can’t stand about the Browns org. If any organization should be quiet and humble it’s the Browns. Yet they get a hint of success and they thump their chest and take credit for inventing football. 

Classic Cabbage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

They are both truly awesome. One is the sister of Rick Neuheisel and was part of my pack of friends when I lived in Phoenix, and the other married a buddy of mine from Newport Beach.

Don't feel the same about what? Name one time that he was "selfish" in a game or that affected the team. He was the complete opposite. Abused his body for the team.

Ironically, for me, the seemingly endless series of self-defense articles featuring Rosen in which he wanted to show how good of a guy he is led me to think that he's a straight-up narcissist. It honestly seemed pretty clear to me by the end of the process, and then he punctuated it with his ridiculously petulant "rue the day" rant after being selected as a TOP TEN PICK. Really unlikable. You're right, though; there are tons of successful jerks in the NFL, and as I always say, for a large percentage of pro players (many of whom are borderline psychos), if not for the NFL, jail.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PetermanThrew5Picks said:

Geez dude, hate prejudice of appearances explained in hyperbole. Guy can throw the pig skin. Brees is a midget? Winston and KB got fat shamed? Baker's too short to succeed. Sproles never had a chance in the league. 40 year old Brady could snap at any point. Lionel Messi is too short (he was diagnosed with dwarfism)? Isiah Thomas never had a chance at playing basketball. Kevin durant is too skinny huh. Old Peyton Manning looked far worse. Wait.. all those guys proved they can play sports. Whoa, I thought a single picture indicates your career success. Weird, must mean Brady's infamous combine picks ruined his career.

 

Wait.. all these guys have something called talent. Huh, didn't know that mattered.

 

Maybe you're right, but wait tell he takes a snap and hits a quick throw to Fitz before Donald touches him. Or wait until Donald and Suh snap him in half. But don't give me a friggin picture and claim it means jack.

 

A girly frame? Got me triggered

 

Yes. A girly frame. Females are naturally narrower at the shoulders than males. So what is so offensive about that to get you fired up? I didnt say a word about any of the other QB’s. Not sure why youre bringing them up here. 

 

We can already have 30 threads about Allen sucking on April 30 but if i say Rosen, who isnt even on the Bills, has a girly frame someone gets triggered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Ironically, for me, the seemingly endless series of self-defense articles featuring Rosen in which he wanted to show how good of a guy he is led me to think that he's a straight-up narcissist. It honestly seemed pretty clear to me by the end of the process, and then he punctuated it with his ridiculously petulant "rue the day" rant after being selected as a TOP TEN PICK. Really unlikable. You're right, though; there are tons of successful jerks in the NFL, and as I always say, for a large percentage of pro players (many of whom are borderline psychos), if not for the NFL, jail.

Isn’t the opposite true though?  He was a 21 year old getting murdered through the draft process, basically being called a POS by “sources.”  He was the #1 qb out of high school and it probably blew his mind that the qb out of Wyoming was being talked about being drafted higher than him.

 

im completely fine with all of these guy’s personality and think this year’s draft process was embarrassing for nfl teams.  It all comes down to what they do on the field and IMO, I think Rosen will be the best of this class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Isn’t the opposite true though?  He was a 21 year old getting murdered through the draft process, basically being called a POS by “sources.”  He was the #1 qb out of high school and it probably blew his mind that the qb out of Wyoming was being talked about being drafted higher than him.

 

im completely fine with all of these guy’s personality and think this year’s draft process was embarrassing for nfl teams.  It all comes down to what they do on the field and IMO, I think Rosen will be the best of this class.

No, the opposite is not true. He brought it on himself by doing so many interviews and in them issuing forth an endless stream of blather and assuming it’d come across as something like profundity. He may turn out to  be good; we shall see. I think Darnold was and will remain better than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Adam727 said:

So the Browns who were supposedly considering Allen at #1 overall actually had him ranked 5th (or lower) behind the other top 4 QBs.  And Arizona who we supposedly had to outbid for Allen at 7 wasn't willing to part with even one 2nd round pick to move up for a QB..

 

I think I need to stop reading football related articles for a few weeks.  I keep waiting for the disappointment from the draft to wear off but articles like this one don't help.  

 

I really hope Beane turns out to be the smartest person in the room and makes all his doubters look stupid, but it feels more and more like there weren't many GMs other than Beane that thought very highly of Allen..  

 

 

I don't understand your reasoning. All the qbs in the top tier were ranked highly by the teams needing qbs.  I'm sure that each team had  different rankings but they were close enough that if their top option wasn't available they would comfortably have settled with one of the other options. If the Bills couldn't have gotten Allen they would have not hesitated to taken Rosen or whomever they ranked next on their board . If the Browns would have taken Darnold it's probable the Jets would have taken Mayfield or their next ranked qb and be happy with the outcome. 

 

The argument many are presenting here is that because one qb was taken over another qb then that qb is considered a diminished player. It appears that Rosen wasn't considered to be the top choice for the qb vying teams. So what? He was considered a serious candidate by all those qb needy teams. 

 

It seems that Rosen felt that he should have been the first qb taken. So a highly competitive person who had a different expectation as how the draft was going to unfold felt the sting of rejection, at least in his mind. The comments he made after the draft were similar to what other players made when they were selected later than they thought. 

 

In the end Rosen went to a team that was probably the best situation for him. It can be reasonably argued that he is in a better situation than the other qbs are in. My belief is that he is going to be a resounding success, and so are the other qbs.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dave mcbride said:

No, the opposite is not true. He brought it on himself by doing so many interviews and in them issuing forth an endless stream of blather and assuming it’d come across as something like profundity. He may turn out to  be good; we shall see. I think Darnold was and will remain better than him.

I hold the 40+ year old men who have bashed the character of 21 year olds at more fault than the athletes.  These grown men are cowards, hide before sources, ask these guys if they are gay, & bash these guy’s relentless. It’s not just Rosen.  I don’t blame any of these players getting upset with this.  Some of these NFL exes should be embarrassed.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

 

....thanks  bud for sharing........his post draft, sulking hissy fit brought out his true colors......putz............bet his teammates can't wait to meet him at the airport......he'll be the one on the VERY high horse wearing a crown..........

Just about every other draft pick they interviewed said something about making teams know they shouldn't have passed them up. But see, you single him out because you have been told to. The media focused on it, so you focused on it. But watching with my own eyes, and thinking, I could see that many many of the players said that same thing. And again, thinking back, I can remember that being said in past drafts too. It is almost a customary thing to say. Tom Brady has made a career of it.

 

 

7 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Let me put it this way.  I would not put a lot of stock in post-draft stories of what teams were and weren't willing to do.  Example: it was reported that Buffalo had offered our two 1sts and next years for #2.  Now Beane says next year's first was never on the table.  So which is true?  Who knows?  Why should anyone tell the truth at this point?  Them grapes sure look sour.

 

It's all gamesmanship.  We haven't found out a thing.  Hearing that the Allen to Cleveland hype was fake shouldn't bother you any more than any other pre-draft rumor.

For whatever it's worth, here's another story that says Dorsey kept the QB order under his vest until the morning of the draft by leaving the QB magnets turned vertical at the top of their board and in the order in which they'd made visits.  Then: " Late Thursday morning, about nine hours before the draft, he gathered the senior staff to tell them the order of the quarterbacks, and what he was likely to do with the top pick—take Mayfield. He kept the board covered until early evening, and shortly before the draft began, the room knew the QB order. "    BUT nonetheless - Schefter and King were able to get intel? even though it was so close to his vest?  Wow, if I worked for Dorsey that would give me great morale that somehow King and Schefter know stuff before the staff does.  I'd really feel empowered and respected.  And why make such a big deal of the order of the QB, when that doesn't matter because they have the #1 pick?  It just doesn't ring true - like it's creative drama.

 

Giving a 1st round pick, 2 2nd round picks, and a player is not a huge haul for a true franchise QB.   The question, as always, is: "is this guy Truth?  or is he not-all-that?

I read that story but I didn't think of that. You are right. It doesn't make sense does it?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

I hold the 40+ year old men who have bashed the character of 21 year olds at more fault than the athletes.  These grown men are cowards, hide before sources, ask these guys if they are gay, & bash these guy’s relentless. It’s not just Rosen.  I don’t blame any of these players getting upset with this.  Some of these NFL exes should be embarrassed.  

Bravo!! Well said!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chuck Wagon said:

I understand it's a lunch with Browns fans, but what's to gain in trashing Allen and Rosen?  

It's a play to continue to build up their own selection.

 

Very similar to how all these heart warming videos of Allen are being pushed in our face to make us warm up to the pick. Heck, worked on me cause i am buying into Allen lol 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

Actually, you're wrong. Rosen would know, as I do, and you should, that the Wonderlic is not a good measure of intelligence.

 

" Performance on the Wonderlic was not significantly correlated with fluid reasoning skills (r=.26) but was most strongly associated with overall intellectual functioning, "

What does the Wonderlic Personnel Test measure?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Ironically, for me, the seemingly endless series of self-defense articles featuring Rosen in which he wanted to show how good of a guy he is led me to think that he's a straight-up narcissist. It honestly seemed pretty clear to me by the end of the process, and then he punctuated it with his ridiculously petulant "rue the day" rant after being selected as a TOP TEN PICK. Really unlikable. You're right, though; there are tons of successful jerks in the NFL, and as I always say, for a large percentage of pro players (many of whom are borderline psychos), if not for the NFL, jail.

 

GIVE ME A BREAK HERE.  Rosen's character was being torn to shreds in the media.  It's the job of his agents to try to redeem him.  There are crowds of hungry journalists looking for something to print.  They weren't getting stories from Jackson, his mom was picking which calls from teams she'd return and never has given journalists the time of day.  Rosen controversy was good clicks and newsstand.   Agent lined up the stories like a series of hoops, gave the calendar to Rosen, Rosen jumped through the hoops like a good boy.  Allen and Darnold weren't doing similar because no one was trashing their character so their agents weren't setting it up. 

 

Mayfield had some issues, and there were stories on him, too (presumably also set up by his agent)

 

That "seemingly endless series of self-defense articles" tells you NOTHING, NOTHING about Rosen's character nor indicates narcissism, and the fact that someone thinks it does (when it's well known top agents handle their prospects PR and SM as part of their services) just shows how out-of-control this whole "bash Rosen" bandwagon has gotten. 

 

Badlands Meanie already responded to the "ridiculous rant" thing.  If Mayfield had dropped and said the same it would show how edgy and competitive he is.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said:

It's a play to continue to build up their own selection.

 

Very similar to how all these heart warming videos of Allen are being pushed in our face to make us warm up to the pick. Heck, worked on me cause i am buying into Allen lol 

 

 

I get it.  The Browns made a classic Browns pick and took Baker over Darnold, who they admitted they had #1 for most of the year (like most everyone) then flipped to Baker because of some made up word.  Now they have to sell Baker over Wentz / Watson / Darnold to a fanbase that already doesn't trust them.

 

Talking about Rosen and Allen is just unprofessional IMO.  I could never imagine Beane or anyone in his FO basically saying "Rosen is a brat and Jackson can't hit a barn".  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said:

 

 

I get it.  The Browns made a classic Browns pick and took Baker over Darnold, who they admitted they had #1 for most of the year (like most everyone) then flipped to Baker because of some made up word.  Now they have to sell Baker over Wentz / Watson / Darnold to a fanbase that already doesn't trust them.

 

Talking about Rosen and Allen is just unprofessional IMO.  I could never imagine Beane or anyone in his FO basically saying "Rosen is a brat and Jackson can't hit a barn".  

Its extremely unprofessional! No two ways about it, but that's what happens when people get on the defensive.

 

Rarely can they make a stance/case for their side. Instead, it is the path of leat resistance to turn the focus on to the deficiencies of others.

 

If they were that confident in Baker, they wouldn't need to push the other guys down in order to pump him up. It's a weak tactic from a weak organization.

Edited by BillsFan17
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nervous Guy said:

" Performance on the Wonderlic was not significantly correlated with fluid reasoning skills (r=.26) but was most strongly associated with overall intellectual functioning, "

What does the Wonderlic Personnel Test measure?

 

 

"While scores on the Wonderlic were more strongly associated with crystallized than fluid reasoning abilities, the Wonderlic test scores did not clearly show convergent and divergent validity evidence across these two broad domains of cognitive ability."

 

Not showing validity means it did not measure what it is said to measure. You only showed the part saying what it did not measure, the worst. So it wasn't as invalid measuring crystalized intelligence (meaning more or less what we already know) as fluid reasoning skills, (meaning more or less learning on the run)

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...