Jump to content

just take jackson and keep picks


Recommended Posts

new OC runs the system he ran in college, could end up being best of bunch and keeping all those picks could fill out a roster with alot of holes.  maybe even trade back one pick and shoot for extra RD1 next year

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may have been the plan all along. Unless there is certainty that The other three are sure bets, trading away great draft spots is not worth it.

‘We will see, because I am sure the 2nd choice is still an option if Beane wants to go that way..

Edited by George C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

Would we play Jackson on the outside or in the slot?

:rolleyes:

 

Jackson is better as a prospect in every way than Josh Allen, other than a few inches of height (Jackson is not short) and the size of his hands. When is Josh Allen converting positions?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Fetou said:

:rolleyes:

 

Jackson is better as a prospect in every way than Josh Allen, other than a few inches of height (Jackson is not short) and the size of his hands. When is Josh Allen converting positions?

 

No.  He's not.  Lamar is a better athlete.  That's where it stops.

Edited by Chicken Boo
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fetou said:

:rolleyes:

 

Jackson is better as a prospect in every way than Josh Allen, other than a few inches of height (Jackson is not short) and the size of his hands. When is Josh Allen converting positions?

 

What does Allen have to do with anything? And why did you take that joke so seriously?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chicken Boo said:

 

No.  He's not.

 

More productive, infinitely more athletic, better adjusted completion percentage, better adjusted YPA, better level of competition in college, more pro-ready offense, and made large improvements from 2016 to 2017. Josh Allen on the other hand regressed and had a bad year at Wyoming.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bangarang said:

 

What does Allen have to do with anything? And why did you take that joke so seriously?

You say that as if the "joke" isn't being thrown around in the media and on here pretty much every time Jackson is brought up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly the pathway the Bills should take.  Stay at 12, take Lamar Jackson.  Let him develop more physically and learn the offense.  Play him in certain packages to get him time in game situations.

 

Use 22 for a top linebacker such as Leighton Vander Esch or Rasean Evans.

 

Use 53 and 56 on OL and WR

 

Use 65 and 96 on CB and DT

 

Six potential contributors at position of need and how do the Bills look in relation to the Jets and Dolphins.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bangarang said:

 

You seem offended? Want to talk about it?

You seem dense. I don't feel the need to talk about it further. Move on. You post stupid comments, you may get a response challenging your stupid assertion. Call it a joke afterwards, that's fine too. Why is it funny? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RPbillsfan said:

This is exactly the pathway the Bills should take.  Stay at 12, take Lamar Jackson.  Let him develop more physically and learn the offense.  Play him in certain packages to get him time in game situations.

 

Use 22 for a top linebacker such as Leighton Vander Esch or Rasean Evans.

 

Use 53 and 56 on OL and WR

 

Use 65 and 96 on CB and DT

 

Six potential contributors at position of need and how do the Bills look in relation to the Jets and Dolphins.

right on bro :thumbsup:

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

Not a pocket passer. Not good at scanning the field. Poor accuracy.

He is a pocket passer. He is actually atrocious at throwing outside of the pocket due to his mechanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fetou said:

 

More productive, infinitely more athletic, better adjusted completion percentage, better adjusted YPA, better level of competition in college, more pro-ready offense, and made large improvements from 2016 to 2017. Josh Allen on the other hand regressed and had a bad year at Wyoming.

 

Not even going to get into the talent disparity between Wyoming and Louisville, you know - the excuse we always hear for Lamar when comparing him to the top prospects this year.

 

You guys really need to stop with this adjusted completetion % ****.  I've never heard that excuse so much in my entire life until this season.  

 

We'll see what the league thinks about who the better prospect is.  Then we'll see who has the better career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chicken Boo said:

 

Not even going to get into the talent disparity between Wyoming and Louisville, you know - the excuse we always hear for Lamar when comparing him to the top prospects this year.

 

You guys really need to stop with this adjusted completetion % ****.  I've never heard that excuse so much in my entire life until this season.  

 

We'll see what the league thinks about who the better prospect is.  Then we'll see who has the better career.

Quotes talent disparity, and then complains about adjusted completion %. Yeah, so you don't know  what you are talking about. Our exchange can stop here and we will wait on your last sentence. 

 

For everyone else, the offensive talent Jackson had to work with at Louisville relative to the defensive competition he was facing is way worse than the same measure for Wyoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I'd take Jackson over Allen .. but agree with sitting tight ... if it took 3 2's to move 3 spots up ... imagine what we'd have to pay to jump the Jets for picks 1 or 2 ... no thanks ... given there is no "clear cut" #1 QB of this class ... sit tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Fetou said:

Quotes talent disparity, and then complains about adjusted completion %. Yeah, so you don't know  what you are talking about. Our exchange can stop here and we will wait on your last sentence. 

 

For everyone else, the offensive talent Jackson had to work with at Louisville relative to the defensive competition he was facing is way worse than the same measure for Wyoming.

 

 

Good thing they're no longer in college, isn't it.  No more heismans for Lamar.

 

You're obviously a fan so I'm sure you've seen his pathetic numbers against the SEC.  49% completion 9 TDs 9 Ints and a 3-4 record.

 

Guess what awaits him in the NFL?  Teams better than Miss. St., I promise you.

 

*insert obligatory adjusted completion % and how Louisville is talent dificient*

Edited by Chicken Boo
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this in another thread. My gut feeling all along had been the Bills love Lamar Jackson. When they moved up to 12, I switched to thinking they are trading up again. After the Jets trade to 3, I believe my gut feeling was right. The Bills moved up to 12 for Jackson. Another trade up to get Roquan Smith would be amazing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFan2313 said:

I said this in another thread. My gut feeling all along had been the Bills love Lamar Jackson. When they moved up to 12, I switched to thinking they are trading up again. After the Jets trade to 3, I believe my gut feeling was right. The Bills moved up to 12 for Jackson. Another trade up to get Roquan Smith would be amazing. 

Agreed, but it would be costly. The 49ers and Raiders are both likely to be giving heavy consideration to a LB prospect.

Edited by Fetou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

Not a pocket passer. Not good at scanning the field. Poor accuracy.

 

He's got a better completion percentage than both Darnold and Allen when you adjust for dropped passes...

 

...and he makes defenders look silly trying to catch him.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...