Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What’s there to discuss? If that’s how it goes then there’s no need for us to even trade up any further. We can stay where we are and draft accordingly

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

Then buffalo trades down from 12 and gets Jackson plus more picks.

 

Also, maybe the Jets fool everyone and make them think they want a QB but instead wanted Barkley or Chubb who now fall to them.....

Posted
  On 3/17/2018 at 6:10 PM, apuszczalowski said:

Then buffalo trades down from 12 and gets Jackson plus more picks.

 

Also, maybe the Jets fool everyone and make them think they want a QB but instead wanted Barkley or Chubb who now fall to them.....

Expand  

  It would be better to maybe move around just a tiny bit and get Roquan Smith.

Posted

The trading is likely going to continue since the key players seemingly QB hungry are already moving. and Draft night will still be as exciting as hell !

  On 3/17/2018 at 6:13 PM, RochesterRob said:

  It would be better to maybe move around just a tiny bit and get Roquan Smith.

Expand  

and a QB.

 yes

Posted

Nope.

 

Indy wanted Barkley, but they just traded down indicating they don't think there's any chance he's available when they pick.

 

My guess is Indy knows something we don't (Barkley is going in the top 2). 

Posted
  On 3/17/2018 at 6:10 PM, apuszczalowski said:

Then buffalo trades down from 12 and gets Jackson plus more picks.

 

Also, maybe the Jets fool everyone and make them think they want a QB but instead wanted Barkley or Chubb who now fall to them.....

Expand  

 

Teams don’t trade up in mid March for that.

 

The Jets are taking a QB.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I would like to discuss the assumption that Darnold is going #1 overall. If you watch him at he actually sucks.  Now the browns suck too so it's believable that they like him as well. But seriously, he should not be in this discussion imo.

 

I can see the browns falling in love with Allen.  Rosen is the clear winner on the field.  But Darnold offers nothing over those two. 

×
×
  • Create New...