Tiberius Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 45 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: Wrong! Donald Trump intentionally diverted the news media attention away from the now Wikileaks proven "crooked" Hillary Clinton and the rigging of her nomination from Bernie Sanders. Then to follow up, Trump engaged the father of a fallen US soldier who was Muslim. This went on for a week. The news media was excoriating Trump. So, his intentional news media diversion worked. What Donald Trump should have done was simply point out that there is now Wikileaks proof that Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and her nomination was proven to be rigged. Donald Trump had overtaken Hillary Clinton in Nate Silver's election model. Nate Silver was a political God to Democrats. Democrats were s****ing bricks but in comes Donald Trump to save the day for them. Intentionally! It was a Bill and Hillary Clinton scam. Not Donald Trump. You don't think Trump could have thrown the election better than that? If he really wanted to lose he could have done a better job of it, like saying he wanted to ban all guns. Boom, that would have been game over for him 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 1 hour ago, PearlHowardman said: Wrong! Donald Trump intentionally diverted the news media attention away from the now Wikileaks proven "crooked" Hillary Clinton and the rigging of her nomination from Bernie Sanders. Then to follow up, Trump engaged the father of a fallen US soldier who was Muslim. This went on for a week. The news media was excoriating Trump. So, his intentional news media diversion worked. What Donald Trump should have done was simply point out that there is now Wikileaks proof that Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and her nomination was proven to be rigged. Donald Trump had overtaken Hillary Clinton in Nate Silver's election model. Nate Silver was a political God to Democrats. Democrats were s****ing bricks but in comes Donald Trump to save the day for them. Intentionally! It was a Bill and Hillary Clinton scam. Not Donald Trump. You are now just expressing your opinion again. The same opinion you expressed to start this thread. You have provided no facts, only other people's opinions from 18 months ago. Saying something over and over again does not make it true. When you stated that you were considering starting this thread I cautioned you about being willing to do the research first to give your theory at least a basis of fact. Well, you haven't done that and your little theory sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 2 hours ago, PearlHowardman said: Gawd those 90s hair styles are awful. And yes, admit it. We all had those hairdos 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 1 hour ago, PearlHowardman said: Wrong! Donald Trump intentionally diverted the news media attention away from the now Wikileaks proven "crooked" Hillary Clinton and the rigging of her nomination from Bernie Sanders. Then to follow up, Trump engaged the father of a fallen US soldier who was Muslim. This went on for a week. The news media was excoriating Trump. So, his intentional news media diversion worked. What Donald Trump should have done was simply point out that there is now Wikileaks proof that Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and her nomination was proven to be rigged. Donald Trump had overtaken Hillary Clinton in Nate Silver's election model. Nate Silver was a political God to Democrats. Democrats were s****ing bricks but in comes Donald Trump to save the day for them. Intentionally! It was a Bill and Hillary Clinton scam. Not Donald Trump. He "intentionally diverted the news media"? Because they were all set to go after Hilly and her just-proven crookedness? And the MSM previously never took anything he said and blew it out of proportion? LOL! The Donald had been calling her crooked for months. The Wikileaks thing just proved what he was saying so it was "ho hum." The MSM had no desire/wasn't going to pursue it for obvious reasons but had every reason to jump on the joke he was making about finding her (other) emails, something the MSM should have been trying to do since day 1 but didn't (again, for obvious reasons). But again, I'll allow that the Clintons might have had an agreement, or at least thought they had one, initially with The Donald. But again, it looks like he played her for a fool, just like the DNC did back in 2008. And maybe he also colluded with Russia to win the election. But the biggest question now is: do you think he's still colluding with them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 1 minute ago, /dev/null said: Gawd those 90s hair styles are awful. And yes, admit it. We all had those hairdos Ummmm no. I didn't not have a hairdo. I had hairstyle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 47 minutes ago, row_33 said: Even the Sore/Loserman ticket had to give up by the day of W’s inauguration what did Hillary tell Al Gore after he lost, did she gloat? Gore and Hiliary reportedly had a frosty relationship and I would not put it past Hiliary to have gloated in 2000. If she did, I would love to know what Gore said to Hiliary in 2016. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 26 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Gore and Hiliary reportedly had a frosty relationship and I would not put it past Hiliary to have gloated in 2000. If she did, I would love to know what Gore said to Hiliary in 2016. Hope Al was behind bulletproof glass for his comment, her high-dudgeon glare could pierce that easily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 I'll chime in with these thoughts... Clinton had plants in Trump's team, this is undeniable (to me) and I believe will soon become a matter of public record when the indictments begin in earnest. Manafort, and Papadopolous are all but confirmed to have been plants as both have much stronger ties to the Clintons and/or Fusion GPS than they ever did Trump. But Trump himself was not a plant. How do we know? They were spying on him - with the assistance of the FBI and USIC, breaking numerous laws in the process. Why risk so much to spy on him if he was a plant? But hey, far be it for me to stop someone from doing their own bit of thinking and speculating. You do you, Pearl. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 On 3/3/2018 at 6:22 PM, row_33 said: We don’t get 8 years of her doing that arms wide clap and then making that goofy face and pointing out to nobody in particular in the audience..... She might be the phoniest person in human history. I mean seriously, name someone who has ever acted more phony than what you just described. It's kind of amazing how absolutely nothing rubbed off after spending decades with Slick Willy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 12 hours ago, /dev/null said: Gawd those 90s hair styles are awful. And yes, admit it. We all had those hairdos Not me - I had lost so much hair by then that I was shaving my head by '98. 6 minutes ago, KD in CA said: She might be the phoniest person in human history. I mean seriously, name someone who has ever acted more phony than what you just described. Are you suggesting that she might not have been sincere in her claim that she had been a lifelong Yankees fan? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Azalin said: Not me - I had lost so much hair by then that I was shaving my head by '98. Are you suggesting that she might not have been sincere in her claim that she had been a lifelong Yankees fan? Hillary always said she was a lifelong Cubs fan until she carpetbagged the NY Senate seat Edited March 5, 2018 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: Hillary always said she was a lifelong Cubs fan until she carpetbagged the NY Senate seat Is "facetious" not a part of the Canadian lexicon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 1 hour ago, Azalin said: Is "facetious" not a part of the Canadian lexicon? Eh? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'll chime in with these thoughts... Clinton had plants in Trump's team, this is undeniable (to me) and I believe will soon become a matter of public record when the indictments begin in earnest. Manafort, and Papadopolous are all but confirmed to have been plants as both have much stronger ties to the Clintons and/or Fusion GPS than they ever did Trump. But Trump himself was not a plant. How do we know? They were spying on him - with the assistance of the FBI and USIC, breaking numerous laws in the process. Why risk so much to spy on him if he was a plant? But hey, far be it for me to stop someone from doing their own bit of thinking and speculating. You do you, Pearl. If the spying theory does come to fruition in sports terms it would be like the Clinton team (Patriots organization) illegally taping the Rams walk through before the Superbowl, but instead of the game winning Vinatieri field goal the Rams blocked it and ran it back for a touchdown. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 1 hour ago, row_33 said: Eh? That's aboot what I expected.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 4 hours ago, Azalin said: Not me - I had lost so much hair by then that I was shaving my head by '98. Are you suggesting that she might not have been sincere in her claim that she had been a lifelong Yankees fan? You mean, this isn't the voice of a Yankees fan? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=hillary+southern+accent+speech&view=detail&mid=E40DFE592A089AC1C6BAE40DFE592A089AC1C6BA&FORM=VIRE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 4 hours ago, Doc Brown said: If the spying theory does come to fruition in sports terms it would be like the Clinton team (Patriots organization) illegally taping the Rams walk through before the Superbowl, but instead of the game winning Vinatieri field goal the Rams blocked it and ran it back for a touchdown. Followed by an unhinged Madden and Summerall trying to explain (more to themselves than the viewer) how that happened and ESPN spends the entire off season talking about how the Patriots* really won Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 So it was Hillary in the library with the candlestick who gave us Trump? Ok! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 5 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: You mean, this isn't the voice of a Yankees fan? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=hillary+southern+accent+speech&view=detail&mid=E40DFE592A089AC1C6BAE40DFE592A089AC1C6BA&FORM=VIRE To this very day, that still makes me cringe. "I ain't in no ways tard....." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 7 hours ago, Azalin said: That's aboot what I expected.... Half our identity derived the worst swear words from basic Roman Catholic terms.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 On 3/3/2018 at 6:29 PM, Tiberius said: Alright Pearl!! This is great! But how did Hillary orchestrate the Donald winning the GOP nomination??? I was against Trump before I was for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 13 minutes ago, westside said: I was against Trump before I was for him. He beat like twenty Republicans! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 24 minutes ago, westside said: I was against Trump before I was for him. Still waiting for the quote from Trump that Hillary should be assassinated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 9 minutes ago, row_33 said: Still waiting for the quote from Trump that Hillary should be assassinated Wasn't that PearlHowardMan That posted that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 I thought the name was Pearl Harbor Women, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I thought the name was Pearl Harbor Women, lol Now you are laughing at Pearl Harbor? Benghazi wasn't funny enough for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Now you are laughing at Pearl Harbor? Benghazi wasn't funny enough for you? Do ya get funny feeling when you bounce them off the ceiling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 On October 31, 2016 when the news media was obsessed with the Comey letter another Wikileaks disclosure was confirmed. That disclosure confirmation was that DNC Chair Donna Brazile (who became DNC Chair after Debbie Waserman-Schultz was forced to resign) gave Hillary Clinton debate questions before Hillary debated Bernie Sanders in Michigan. For the second time Donald Trump could have ended the election. The confirmed Wikileaks disclosure showed "crooked" Hillary Clinton involved in rigging an election. The debate was in swing state Michigan. It involved an African American audience member. Donald Trump's response? Barely mentioned it. Only FOX News gave it any real coverage. The other networks barely mentioned it - mainly because Donald Trump barely mentioned it. The 2016 Presidential election was a complete sham! On 3/4/2018 at 10:57 AM, 3rdnlng said: ...your little theory sucks. You're in complete denial. I gave plenty of credible links. Worse, President Donald Trump seems to be physically and mentally deteriorating every day. 21 hours ago, row_33 said: Still waiting for the quote from Trump that Hillary should be assassinated https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/09/trump-gun-owners-clinton-judges-second-amendment Donald Trump hints at assassination of Hillary Clinton by gun rights supporters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TtownBillsFan Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/3/2018 at 4:04 PM, 3rdnlng said: Donald Trump called for Clinton's assassination? So far in your words and in the link all I see is wild speculation that did not turn out the way the speculation hoped. If this is all you have then you've already failed. Agreed. I don't recall him calling for anyone's assassination. That likely would have been really bad. And, am I in a time warp here, but didn't Trump beat Clinton? I keep looking at the time-stamp on the posts, but they all appear to be, like, now, and not a year+ ago. WTF am I missing here? On 3/3/2018 at 4:58 PM, PearlHowardman said: The Hill? The Washington Post? Bloomberg? National Review? BBC? These are not Infowars level media. Longtime New York Democrat Donald Trump did everything he could to destroy his own Presidential campaign as the Republican nominee. But the unanticipated Wikileaks did more damage to his opponent (and friend) Hillary Clinton. So we're stuck with a President who did not want to be President, does not want to be President, and does not possess the skills to be President. And we're about to be hit with an IG report exposing the DNC's scandalous role in the 2016 Presidential election. Everyone is losing. If you don't see the problem that our country is in then you're hopeless. "Very pro-choice" but now pro-life Donald Trump's kids Erik and Ivanka were not allowed to vote in the 2016 NY GOP Primary because they were registered Democrats! Except that the economy is booming like gangbusters, which will happen any time you go from a lib to a non-lib candidate. And as we all know, it's always about the economy. Everything else, from gun-control to abortion to yada-yada-yada, it's always about the economy. On 3/3/2018 at 5:23 PM, PearlHowardman said: I don't. There was no 2016 Presidential election. It was a scandal. A scandal started by Bill and Hillary Clinton. They offered the part of foil to Donald Trump and he took it. What was Donald Trump supposed to get in return for intentionally losing the 2016 Presidential election to Hillary Clinton? Answer: Occupancy of the Lincoln Bedroom in the White House. And fast track approval for any business deal that Donald Trump wants. Especially in, you guessed it: RUSSIA! Remember when the Clintons were in the White House selling the Lincoln Bedroom to the highest bidder? The Clintons aren't Democrats any more. They're filthy, lying, greedy, selfish, Wall Street corporatists. We are ALL in trouble! Nope, sounds exactly like the Democrat Party of today, except replace corporatists with crony-socialists. But whatever label you want to put on them, you're right, we're all in trouble if they get ahold of power again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TtownBillsFan Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/3/2018 at 6:30 PM, PearlHowardman said: The only 2016 Republican Presidential candidate who appealed to this Republican base vote was Donald Trump. All others were basically RINOs. The Republican base show up to vote for Donald Trump in November 2016. Trump loses to his planned self-destruction. Hillary Clinton wins the Presidency and runs a pro Wall Street agenda. Republicans maintain control of the House and Senate. And all those meetings that Team Trump were having with Russians, which people thought related to the election but really related to Trump business deals, start to pay off. Finally, President Hillary Clinton renames the White House Lincoln bedroom the Donald Trump bedroom. Did you ever hear of Ted Cruz? He's as right-wing conservative as you can get. He IS the Republican base. He just got branded by the Trump, and lost as a result. The same way as 'lying-hillary' got branded. What is going on here? I really don't know. Is this Pearl-person making excuses for hillary? Or is he/she/it really thinking there's some grand conspiracy here? DR, is someone trying to step on toes? On 3/4/2018 at 9:21 AM, PearlHowardman said: Donald Trump didn't look happy coming out on stage after he was declared winner. of the 2016 election It took him a long time to get out on stage, too. I don't wonder why. Well crap-boy-howdy, here we have it, I didn't think it possible, but we have a new tin-foil-hat champion. You really think one of the most narcissistic people on the planet, maybe only out-narcisissted by one of the Clinton dynasty, would NOT want the most powerful seat at the table? He's sat at about the most powerful seat you can in private life. But you're saying the most powerful seat on the planet was offered up to this guy, and he wouldn't take it, gleefully? I think your arguments kind of fall in on themselves, or at minimum, do extreme battle against one another until none stands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TtownBillsFan Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 On 3/4/2018 at 10:27 PM, Azalin said: Is "facetious" not a part of the Canadian lexicon? Please don't quote that twatwaffle. I was enjoying a '33'-free existence 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 36 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: On October 31, 2016 when the news media was obsessed with the Comey letter another Wikileaks disclosure was confirmed. That disclosure confirmation was that DNC Chair Donna Brazile (who became DNC Chair after Debbie Waserman-Schultz was forced to resign) gave Hillary Clinton debate questions before Hillary debated Bernie Sanders in Michigan. For the second time Donald Trump could have ended the election. The confirmed Wikileaks disclosure showed "crooked" Hillary Clinton involved in rigging an election. The debate was in swing state Michigan. It involved an African American audience member. Donald Trump's response? Barely mentioned it. Only FOX News gave it any real coverage. The other networks barely mentioned it - mainly because Donald Trump barely mentioned it. The 2016 Presidential election was a complete sham! You're in complete denial. I gave plenty of credible links. Worse, President Donald Trump seems to be physically and mentally deteriorating every day. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/09/trump-gun-owners-clinton-judges-second-amendment Donald Trump hints at assassination of Hillary Clinton by gun rights supporters Oh, that's real evidence. If you continue to post crap like this as "proof" or real evidence you'll soon be considered just another laughingstock here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TtownBillsFan Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 22 hours ago, westside said: I was against Trump before I was for him. Ditto this. I was for Cruz. But I can't argue much against what he's actually put in place thus far. I can argue, full-throated, against some things he's suggesting. But not against anything thus-far implemented. 23 hours ago, Azalin said: To this very day, that still makes me cringe. "I ain't in no ways tard....." Oh, ROFL, is that that clip. Oh my, I cringe, and am embarrassed for her when I hear that. That's just painful, I don't care who you are. You can be the biggest supporter of HILLDOG in the world, and that has to make you hurt in the wrong places. It just demonstrates how utterly fake she is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 21 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Oh, that's real evidence. If you continue to post crap like this as "proof" or real evidence you'll soon be considered just another laughingstock here. Donald Trump is running a Presidential campaign calling his opponent Hillary Clinton "crooked" and saying that the election process is rigged. Donald Trump is gifted two examples where Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and the election process is rigged. Donald Trump ignored both cases. Actually, in the July 2016 example, Donald Trump intentionally distracted the media away from "crooked" Hillary Clinton and proof that the election process is rigged. 2 + 2 = 4 in my world. Donald Trump was clearly a Hillary Clinton plant. Brought in by Bill Clinton. Bill and Hillary Clinton are slime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: Donald Trump is running a Presidential campaign calling his opponent Hillary Clinton "crooked" and saying that the election process is rigged. Donald Trump is gifted two examples where Hillary Clinton is proven to be "crooked" and the election process is rigged. Donald Trump ignored both cases. Actually, in the July 2016 example, Donald Trump intentionally distracted the media away from "crooked" Hillary Clinton and proof that the election process is rigged. 2 + 2 = 4 in my world. Donald Trump was clearly a Hillary Clinton plant. Brought in by Bill Clinton. Bill and Hillary Clinton are slime. You live in a world that I have no desire entering. You might want to see if any of his surrogates addressed these situations, which is a common thing to do in elections. You posted a few days ago that you were going to bring up this subject and prove it ala Greg's deep state theories. Well, let me tell you this: I know Greg, Greg is a friend of mine and I can tell you sir, you are no Greg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 22 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Wasn't that PearlHowardMan That posted that? Whatever, a very evil thing to suggest as it isn’t remotely true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 6, 2018 Share Posted March 6, 2018 7 minutes ago, PearlHowardman said: You've found the proof. Trump just can't stay away from collusion, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted March 6, 2018 Author Share Posted March 6, 2018 Collusion with the Clintons. To LOSE the 2016 Presidential election? Yes!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts