Jump to content

If You Ever Want a Top Rated QB Prospect...You Have to Suffer


Recommended Posts

The Biggest problem with this team was a lack of quality GM, coaching, and scouting dept to find a high caliber talent in the first place. Second, to allow him to survive long enough to develop properly.

 

Trent Edwards looked like a young Joe Montana at first (2008) and after several severe concussions behind bad lines with terribad coaching(Turk Schonert, AVP), a bad scheme ( A WCO QB in a Mike Martz deep passing scheme) he became a bad QB. Just like JP Losman, EJ.

 

Shoot, EJ didn't even have the luxury of a QB coach in his first season in Buffalo, nor did he have a veteran QB to help show him the ropes. All he had was an OC who had never been an NFL OC previously. Talk about a ridiculously stupid way to develop a QB. To draft a rookie QB in the first round only to not give him the proper means to develop. He was supposed to sit for a season to develop and even that wouldn't have helped at all with nobody to teach him. EJ stated he learned far more from watching Kyle Orton prepare for a game than from any coaching. 

 

This new HC, GM, OC, and scouting dept should be able to determine a high caliber QB from the top six and then draft, develop him properly. This, for the first time in nearly a decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

Not the case. Countless examples to refute this.

 

 

but yet you list not one...... And not the first time you just spout off this stuff but nothing to back it up.

 

Its great that you post news and info but you offer mostly nothing to logically debate or refute what has been posted.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ILBillsfan said:

but yet you list not one...... And not the first time you just spout off this stuff but nothing to back it up.

 

Its great that you post news and info but you offer mostly nothing to logically debate or refute what has been posted.

 

You should read the thread before spouting off because I did provide examples. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

I know I call you out all the time, and deservedly so because your responses are almost always this painful.

 

I advise two things to you when replying:

1) the original poster had a premise he believed in (whether you did or not, you're not special to be a judge in it's worth and see #2). So, when you disagree tell why and list examples of those countless examples. Otherwise you sound just like yourself: a joke

 

2) don't reply at all. You're not special. You're a joke.

 

Your constant inclusion to reply with one liners to someone's original thought is immature.  It is also hypocritical when you, yourself, can only muster up 99.27% of your contributions here as being someone else's content with the remaining minority lacking effort and original thought.

 

tl,dr: you're a joke and keep it to yourself, Francis.

Damn, I'm on nobody's side here but you sound like you have a clear vendetta towards 26 and I personally agree with his response, but the point is,the same things you're accusing him of,you are doing yourself. 

I guess leading by example isn't an option

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

You should read the thread before spouting off because I did provide examples. 

No you didn't  ..... thus the quote ....oph you mean three pages in when all you listed Roethlisberger(closest you came) Wentz who fit his scenario they moved up to get him and rogers who was not viewed as a top QB prospect.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JerseyBills said:

Damn, I'm on nobody's side here but you sound like you have a clear vendetta towards 26 and I personally agree with his response, but the point is,the same things you're accusing him of,you are doing yourself. 

I guess leading by example isn't an option

If you do not get it you don’t get it.  

 

Copying someone else’s words 90 % of the time and calling people clueless 5% of the time leaves 5% of his posts actual commentary.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ILBillsfan said:

No you didn't  ..... thus the quote ....oph you mean three pages in when all you listed Roethlisberger(closest you came) Wentz who fit his scenario they moved up to get him and rogers who was not viewed as a top QB prospect

 

 

No I mean on the first page when I responded to the OP and Rodgers was in the running to be selected first overall with Alex Smith in 2005.  Know what you're talking about before ignorantly spouting off. 

 

1 hour ago, JerseyBills said:

Damn, I'm on nobody's side here but you sound like you have a clear vendetta towards 26 and I personally agree with his response, but the point is,the same things you're accusing him of,you are doing yourself. 

I guess leading by example isn't an option

 

Of course he has a vendetta, but that's a sad reflection on him.  He's not the only one as you see from another pathetic post by @ShadyBillsFan

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

No I mean on the first page when I responded to the and Rodgers was in the running to be selected first overall with Alex Smith in 2005.  Know what you're talking about before ignorantly spouting off. 

No he wasn't here straight form the packers page

 

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/02/watch-aaron-rodgers-reads-his-old-draft-scouting-reports/

 

Btw this would be actually providing facts vs spouting off with just your opinion

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ILBillsfan said:

No he wasn't here straight form the packers page

 

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/02/watch-aaron-rodgers-reads-his-old-draft-scouting-reports/

 

Btw this would be actually providing facts vs spouting off with just your opinio

 

 

Straight from your link:

 

Rodgers was seen as a potential No. 1 overall pick coming out of Cal in 2005. The San Francisco 49ers passed, taking Alex Smith with the top pick, leaving Rodgers to free fall all the way to No. 24. There, Packers general manager Ted Thompson was ready and waiting.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Straight from your link:

 

Rodgers was seen as a potential No. 1 overall pick coming out of Cal in 2005. The San Francisco 49ers passed, taking Alex Smith with the top pick, leaving Rodgers to free fall all the way to No. 24. There, Packers general manager Ted Thompson was ready and waiting.

and all of these but I like that you are actually showing facts vs just your words

 

NFL Scout: “I think he has a good chance of being a bust. Just like every other Tedford-coached quarterback. Thing I struggle with him is he gets sacked a lot. He doesn’t have great ability to change the release of the football. He’s mechanically very rigid. Brett Favre can change his release point and find different windows. There will be more growing pains with Alex Smith but in the end he has a much better chance to be much better.”

NFC scout: “The guys that Tedford has had, what have they developed into? They’re too well-schooled. So mechanical. So robotic. I don’t know if they become good pro players. I think Rodgers is in that same mold.”

AFC scout: “He’s a system quarterback. 3-, 5-, 7-step guy. Can’t create on his own. Panics under pressure. Gets flustered easy. I don’t think there’s a quarterback in the draft worthy of a first-round pick. I’m dead serious. None of them are worth it.”

Marc Ross, Buffalo: “He’s a little short. The thing you worry about is those (Jeff) Tedford guys. They don’t do anything for a couple years and then they have a good year or two. Who of his quarterbacks has done what they’re supposed to do? None of them. Is he just working magic with great college quarterbacks or just manufacturing guys?”

AFC scout: “I don’t like him. He’s a clone of Harrington and Boller. They all throw the same way. What have those guys done? Nothing. If you take him in the second round, fine. Heady guy. They do a marvelous job of coaching quarterbacks there. I don’t think he’s as good as the top quarterbacks coming out last year.”

 

Getting way off the original subject but I do think it was interesting see Marc Ross form Buffalo that year and the scouting reports show 23 times whey teams did not think he was top rated QB prospect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ILBillsfan said:

 

and all of these but I like that you are actually showing facts vs just your words

 

NFL Scout: “I think he has a good chance of being a bust. Just like every other Tedford-coached quarterback. Thing I struggle with him is he gets sacked a lot. He doesn’t have great ability to change the release of the football. He’s mechanically very rigid. Brett Favre can change his release point and find different windows. There will be more growing pains with Alex Smith but in the end he has a much better chance to be much better.”

NFC scout: “The guys that Tedford has had, what have they developed into? They’re too well-schooled. So mechanical. So robotic. I don’t know if they become good pro players. I think Rodgers is in that same mold.”

AFC scout: “He’s a system quarterback. 3-, 5-, 7-step guy. Can’t create on his own. Panics under pressure. Gets flustered easy. I don’t think there’s a quarterback in the draft worthy of a first-round pick. I’m dead serious. None of them are worth it.”

Marc Ross, Buffalo: “He’s a little short. The thing you worry about is those (Jeff) Tedford guys. They don’t do anything for a couple years and then they have a good year or two. Who of his quarterbacks has done what they’re supposed to do? None of them. Is he just working magic with great college quarterbacks or just manufacturing guys?”

AFC scout: “I don’t like him. He’s a clone of Harrington and Boller. They all throw the same way. What have those guys done? Nothing. If you take him in the second round, fine. Heady guy. They do a marvelous job of coaching quarterbacks there. I don’t think he’s as good as the top quarterbacks coming out last year.”

 

Getting way off the original subject but I do think it was interesting see Marc Ross form Buffalo that year and the scouting reports show 23 times whey teams did not think he was top rated QB prospect

 

I'll bet all of them wished they had a do over on those scouting reports. :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JerseyBills said:

Damn, I'm on nobody's side here but you sound like you have a clear vendetta towards 26 and I personally agree with his response, but the point is,the same things you're accusing him of,you are doing yourself. 

I guess leading by example isn't an option

I do.  I think he brings the board down with his potshots and always chirping in baselessly. Most ignore him but since the original Kaepernick thread when he spouted off constantly providing no insight and engaging others hostily whom got disciplined for returning fire I have called him out all day and will continue to do so.

 

He is a worthless poster.

 

I don't need to lead by the way. It not my style. 

 

 

12 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

No I mean on the first page when I responded to the and Rodgers was in the running to be selected first overall with Alex Smith in 2005.  Know what you're talking about before ignorantly spouting off. 

 

 

Of course he has a vendetta, but that's a sad reflection on him.  He's not the only one as you see from another pathetic post by @ShadyBillsFan

Grow a pair and engage me you coward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Let's take a look at a couple ways teams acquired QB that refute this

Seasnakes: Case study for Draft a Hidden Gem

2010/2011 7-9, 7-9 (Hasselbeck, TJax).  #7D

2012 (Wilson, drafted in 3rd) 11-5 [I would like to point out that they both brought TJax back that year as a baseline, and signed the best FA they could find]

2013 13-3, Superbowl

 

KC: Case study for "trade for that QB" - they did suffer, but weren't able to benefit from a high QB pick

2011 7-9

2012 2-14  (Cassel)

2013 11-5 (Smith, traded from 49ers for 2 2nd round picks) [the Chiefs owned the #1 pick but did not like the QB draft class]

 

Iggles: Case study "trade for, then draft #2, sign FA, I don't care, just f**kin' get one.  Get two.  Hell, get four!")

2013, 2014 10-6 (Foles, Sanchez)

2015 7-9 (Bradford, traded from StL Rams)

2016 7-9 (Wentz, traded up to pick.  Then recovered picks by trading Bradford) [also signed Chase Daniel in FA]

2017 13-3 (Wentz, Foles) [signed Foles in FA and released Daniel]

 

I don't want to deny that a high 1st round pick (after sucking the year before, in a year with a great QB draft) is the most straightforward way to get a QB.

But I think all of the above cases show that there are various strategies that will work.  You just have to try, and keep trying.

 

The Bills problem isn't that they haven't "suffered enough", it's that they haven't tried hard enough.  Our one shot was to draft a QB late 1st in a class where those owning the top picks turned up their noses, give that 2 years.  Then another one-shot to sign a sleeper FA, give that 3 years.  Rinse and repeat.

 

Yes, option #3 was left out......sit where you are and get lucky! You mentioned Wilson, but Aaron Rodgers came to my mind first. Packers sat there at 24 and he fell in their laps. THAT was a good day for the Packers! But you have to be willing to pull the trigger.

 

 

I almost wish I had stayed out of this thread entirely!  :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

Yes, option #3 was left out......sit where you are and get lucky! You mentioned Wilson, but Aaron Rodgers came to my mind first. Packers sat there at 24 and he fell in their laps. THAT was a good day for the Packers! But you have to be willing to pull the trigger.

 

I almost wish I had stayed out of this thread entirely!  :huh:

 

It should have stayed as strictly a football discussion, but too many trolls decided to take it off course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

I do.  I think he brings the board down with his potshots and always chirping in baselessly. Most ignore him but since the original Kaepernick thread when he spouted off constantly providing no insight and engaging others hostily whom got disciplined for returning fire I have called him out all day and will continue to do so.

 

He is a worthless poster.

 

I don't need to lead by the way. It not my style. 

 

 

Grow a pair and engage me you coward.

Well I guess ill just get my popcorn ready. I actually enjoy and respect both of you guys , as you both are very active and imo provide quality information and insight. I don't agree with everything you guys say but I definitely respect both of your guys football i.q..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2018 at 3:34 PM, Schmuggs said:

Nice comment. 

 

Why do you feel the need to attempt to bring down someone because he disagree with your weak opinion?

 

I suggest you control yourself and stop with the d-bag like attitude.   

 

Lets be cool and respectful. 

 

Thanks RWNW. 

 

 

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. THIS coming from the hypocrite who acts like he's the moral arbiter of the board? You JUST called him a douchebag!!! How's that respectful? Take off Leroi, you have nothing to say anymore. 

Edited by ndirish1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...