Jump to content

If Saquan Barkley really is a better NFL prospect than Zeke.


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

On 12/6/2017 at 11:40 PM, Dkollidas said:

I could totally see the Giants being the type of team to take him at #2 and forego a QB because they think Webb might be the guy and Eli has juice left. Just seems like something they’d do. But who knows with whoever takes over the team. 

 

Giants?  They are not often that stupid.   I don't see any way they don't draft a QB.   It's the perfect time for them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
7 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

They could be correct.  But this is also lying season too, with some nuggets of truth sprinkled in.  I don't doubt he's talked with teams that don't have him in the top 7.  He doesn't indicate how many teams he's talked to.  But that's beside the point.  No team will give you their position on the QB's at this point either.  They'll indicate that they like a certain guy, but they are not going to say I have Darnold at 1, Mayfield at 2 so on and so forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

 

Interesting.  I have him 6th on my board at the moment but have lots more potential first rounders to fix a grade on.  I know I have said it a few times this past couple of days but I feel like this is a kinda 'meh' draft class beyond obviously a deep QB group.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

 

Interesting.  I have him 6th on my board at the moment but have lots more potential first rounders to fix a grade on.  I know I have said it a few times this past couple of days but I feel like this is a kinda 'meh' draft class beyond obviously a deep QB group.  

I agree with your assessment on this class. QB, RB and LB are the strengths of the class. I think that the OL is pretty good. In general though this class isn’t very deep. You know my perspective on drafting to the strength of the draft. I believe that you get better value that way. 

 

Additionally in a “lean” draft I wouldn’t hesitate to package picks to move up to a get a specific player if I liked them. This Bills team has a lot of holes but at the same time I would rather get 1 good player than 2 guys overdrafted out of need. As a small example I’d be fine taking the 2 2nds and moving to the back of the 1st to get Sony Michel. While, on paper, it may seem smarter to stand pat and get Royce Freeman and Frank Ragnow I’d rather take the guy that I think can be a star. In strong drafts the quality of players in the mid to late 50’s is equivalent to the top 30 in a lean draft. The guys that will go mid to late 50’s this year might have been a full rounder lower a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I agree with your assessment on this class. QB, RB and LB are the strengths of the class. I think that the OL is pretty good. In general though this class isn’t very deep. You know my perspective on drafting to the strength of the draft. I believe that you get better value that way. 

 

Additionally in a “lean” draft I wouldn’t hesitate to package picks to move up to a get a specific player if I liked them. This Bills team has a lot of holes but at the same time I would rather get 1 good player than 2 guys overdrafted out of need. As a small example I’d be fine taking the 2 2nds and moving to the back of the 1st to get Sony Michel. While, on paper, it may seem smarter to stand pat and get Royce Freeman and Frank Ragnow I’d rather take the guy that I think can be a star. In strong drafts the quality of players in the mid to late 50’s is equivalent to the top 30 in a lean draft. The guys that will go mid to late 50’s this year might have been a full rounder lower a year ago.

 

Yea the OL at the top end is better than last year but I am not sure the depth is great there to be honest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea the OL at the top end is better than last year but I am not sure the depth is great there to be honest. 

Agreed, but there are some guys that could be perennial pro bowlers (Price, Nelson) and some guys with huge ceilings (Connor Williams). There are starting caliber players there through about round 3 IMO. You are rolling the dice some once you get past there.

 

Also, out of curiosity how would you have ranked the following players coming out: Barkley, Zeke, Fournette, Gurley?

Edited by Kirby Jackson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Agreed, but there are some guys that could be perennial pro bowlers (Price, Nelson) and some guys with huge ceilings (Connor Williams). There are starting caliber players there through about round 3 IMO. You are rolling the dice some once you get past there.

 

Also, out of curiosity how would you have ranked the following players coming out: Barkley, Zeke, Fournette, Gurley?

 

Zeke would be first I was very high on him. I would have to go back and check my final grade on Fournette last year but he and Barkley pretty close.... all top 10 grades. Gurley I had a mid 1st on. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...