Jump to content

?Christine Michael RB Depth?


Recommended Posts

We didn't draft a RB this year, in a very heavy RB class. That's my only true issue with our draft and word from Packer Nation is that they'll be showing Christine Michael the door. He performed pretty well last season early on for Rawls who was injured. Was a Sparq freak coming into the league while always seeming to land with teams that had a stud RB ahead of him. I've always loved his explosiveness hitting the hole (has a hard time finding it sometimes) but at the very least would be depth at a position we're very weak at. I'm surprised Green Bay is considering this, the RB core there is pretty bad. He's bounced around a lot and in the past has had a pretty poor attitude but seemed to really turn it around last year, acted like a professional wanting to improve. It couldn't hurt to bring him in and it's not like there are a ton of options out there... Charles, Blount and some no names.

What do you think TBD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already signed shareece. Let's really make it fun

 

Is there a Dorothy out there?

 

I don't know what role he would have here. Than again in dennisons offense not sure how McCoy will work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see McD wanting anything to do with this guy. I sure don't want anything to do with this guy

Yes. It appeared that Michael got several chances from several teams to establish himself and earn a large role, and he failed every time. Seems kinda trash to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Now visiting the Pats.. is this to pressure Blount or genuine interest. I'd take a look if I were the Bills, our RB depth is not good. It'd definitely hurt if Michael goes off for the Pats.

 

Why they need this many RBs is a head scratcher.

if they get him and Blount they will have something like nine running back's on the roster. And soon the entire league will follow suit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy must suck because everyone gives up on him. He was one of my starting rbs in fantasy and Seattle just cut him.

 

Also, there are so many young rbs why would you sign a pricey vet? Always go younger on RB unless it's a freak like Adrian Peterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy must suck because everyone gives up on him. He was one of my starting rbs in fantasy and Seattle just cut him.

 

Also, there are so many young rbs why would you sign a pricey vet? Always go younger on RB unless it's a freak like Adrian Peterson.

As you stated, he's bounced around but was productive for Seattle early in the season.

A pricey vet? I guarantee if he signs with the Pats it's for cheap. He's not in the position to be chasing a big contract.

I'm baffled as to how I'm alone here in wanting to bring him in. If one of the smartest football minds, with an already stacked RB core, thinks this is a savvy move and brings him in.. then it probably isn't one we should shy away from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...