yall Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 I had no problem getting it up when I was in Korea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Can't get it up...............again. Perhaps we should show him how....... The world-threatening missiles are hiding with the intelligence report of Putin manipulating the US Election, both with Geraldo in Al Capone's vault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 (edited) I think it's China that keeps Kim propped up. For all their intricacies, North Korea is a stable regime. If the Kim regime should collapse China will have either an unknown and possibly unstable nuclear armed neighbor, or face the prospect of a unified Korean neighbor that is both nuclear armed and aligned to the West I'm not sure what the standard of living for the masses in the North is, but if reports are accurate, I think "stable" and "subsistence level" are probably interchangeable. Ever notice that you almost never see photos of regular N Koreans? Mainly you only see their relatively better-fed military. Best case scenario was (a long time ago) to have done our damndest to pry open the hermetically sealed information dome that the regime places over their people and give them a little sunlight and vision of what the rest of the world lives like. Either that ship sailed, or it is completely impossible to inform people on a basic level what their lives are live vs. what their lives should be like. I doubt the South could handle unification without major aid. I think China would have a really hard time dealing with a collapsed North, too. I think the silver lining in this recent conflict is the fact that what to do with the North can't be solved without China's involvement without millions losing their lives -- and that's what will drive everyone to tamp down the flames. I can't believe I'm saying it, but too bad the UN sucks so badly. Some effective overarching institution could actually be helpful. Edit: Either all that drivel, OR China is actually driving all this conflict and can shut it down when the see fit. Their motivation is to get the West to keep the economic stability and to make sure they're not labeled "currency manipulators". Edited April 29, 2017 by snafu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 I'm not sure what the standard of living for the masses in the North is, but if reports are accurate, I think "stable" and "subsistence level" are probably interchangeable. Ever notice that you almost never see photos of regular N Koreans? Mainly you only see their relatively better-fed military. Something like 25% of the country is under arms. "Regular N. Koreans" are the military, pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Something like 25% of the country is under arms. "Regular N. Koreans" are the military, pretty much. Probably the only way to get a decent meal, if reports are true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Something like 25% of the country is under arms. "Regular N. Koreans" are the military, pretty much. And the rest are children, the elderly, or in slave labor camps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Probably the only way to get a decent meal, if reports are true. That, or have kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Has to be some NK reasonable individuals in contact with outer powers who are set to take over peaceably, or give it a go. Nothing is sacrosanct from moles or leaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Again, I think they're foolish to have parades and show-off demos of their arsenals because they concentrate those assets and their command structure into very small positions that could be relatively easy to target with cruise missles and other ordinance. POOF!!! Up goes your military Mr. Kim. So solly challie. You big-a-ass-a-hole you. Then what? As I recall, Sadham and Al Quesadilla in Afghanistan were easy to beat too. My memory is a little foggy after 15 years though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Has to be some NK reasonable individuals in contact with outer powers who are set to take over peaceably, or give it a go. It's quite likely there aren't, given that such people tend to have very short life spans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Has to be some NK reasonable individuals in contact with outer powers who are set to take over peaceably, or give it a go. Nothing is sacrosanct from moles or leaks. the world needs a bogeyman for what is coming down the pike. don't be fooled, watch what the other hand is doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Then what? As I recall, Sadham and Al Quesadilla in Afghanistan were easy to beat too. My memory is a little foggy after 15 years though. DPRK's a completely different situation, though. It's worse. DPRK's so insular, even Afghanistan is cosmopolitan in comparison. And after three generations of being controlled by the Kims, there's little sense of independence that you'd see in Afghan tribes or Iraqi minority cultures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 the world needs a bogeyman for what is coming down the pike. don't be fooled, watch what the other hand is doing. Germany had enough generals going through the motions of "this is so over a year ago" just waiting for an assassination or the end of it Many were smart enough to surrender to the US/UK side --------------------------------------------- All I know is that lefties and libs will whine and cry over whatever happens. They will set up a million straw men and then pretend they never did when they don't pan out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Germany had enough generals going through the motions of "this is so over a year ago" just waiting for an assassination or the end of it Many were smart enough to surrender to the US/UK side --------------------------------------------- All I know is that lefties and libs will whine and cry over whatever happens. They will set up a million straw men and then pretend they never did when they don't pan out. Surrender? Nah. Most were recruited, paid, and brought in to run the burgeoning American intelligence apparatus in Europe - war crimes be damned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Surrender? Nah. Most were recruited, paid, and brought in to run the burgeoning American intelligence apparatus in Europe - war crimes be damned. Yes. Mostly, after they surrendered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Surrender? Nah. Most were recruited, paid, and brought in to run the burgeoning American intelligence apparatus in Europe - war crimes be damned. From the Soviet side it makes perfect sense. Wouldn't doubt that the US got to a few important people to try and make it end a lot quicker. The US distinguished between those in the army and air force who did what duty commanded, and then some to a point, versus those in other organizations that were total evil. Yes. Mostly, after they surrendered. The US space program grabbed better scientists than the USSR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 (edited) From the Soviet side it makes perfect sense. Wouldn't doubt that the US got to a few important people to try and make it end a lot quicker. The US distinguished between those in the army and air force who did what duty commanded, and then some to a point, versus those in other organizations that were total evil. The bolded is false. The US officially said they were distinguishing between ardent Nazis and "political" Nazis, but that was a lie as has been proven with multiple FOIA releases. They actively scrubbed records and employed, paid, protected (from the Soviets and Mossad), and turned the keys of their entire European intelligence apparatus over to men who were the planners and executioners of the extermination campaigns along the eastern front. The BND was quite literally started and run by one such Nazi - who prior to its formation, ran the entire European intelligence apparatus for CIA. Edited April 30, 2017 by Deranged Rhino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 The bolded is false. The US officially said they were distinguishing between ardent Nazis and "political" Nazis, but that was a lie as has been proven with multiple FOIA releases. They actively scrubbed records and employed, paid, protected (from the Soviets and Mossad), and turned the keys of their entire European intelligence apparatus over to men who were the planners and executioners of the extermination campaigns along the eastern front. The BND was quite literally started and run by one such Nazi - who prior to its formation, ran the entire European intelligence apparatus for CIA. More to the point, it was completely impossible to distinguish between "those who did what duty commanded," and those who "were total evil." Particularly on the Eastern Front, where all these organizations were interrelated at some level. Your example, for instance: Gehlen was not an architect of the Holocaust, but he ran FHO, which gave him an operational relationship with the Sicherheitsdienst and the Bandenkampfverbanden, the latter of which was "anti-partisan" and may or may not have included anti-Jewish operations, depending on the situation, and included forces from all over the German bureaucracy and military (e.g. various police organizations, ersatz units, army combat units, Waffen SS, Toetenkopfverbande, Luwftwaffe ground units, the Reichsbahn, various other sundry organizations.) The point being that Nazi German organization was so byzantine that aside from a handful of high-level officials (Himmler, Bach-Zelewski, Frank, Globocnik, Eichmann, Ohlendorf, Heydrich, etc.) making a definitive statement that someone is an "architect" of the extermination campaign is falsely deterministic. If a senior officer of the Orpo (uniformed police), hence part of the SD, who was seconded to the SS Polizei division and assigned to anti-partisan operations in Minsk alongside a Reichsbahn unit that had just shipped Jews to Maidanek, is he a planner and executioner of the extermination campaigns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 South Korea said Sunday the U.S. reaffirmed it would pay for the deployment of the THAAD anti-missile system, days after President Trump said Seoul should pay for the near $1 billion-battery. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/04/30/mcmaster-assures-south-korea-us-will-pay-for-thaad-anti-missile-system-seoul-says.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 The bolded is false. The US officially said they were distinguishing between ardent Nazis and "political" Nazis, but that was a lie as has been proven with multiple FOIA releases. They actively scrubbed records and employed, paid, protected (from the Soviets and Mossad), and turned the keys of their entire European intelligence apparatus over to men who were the planners and executioners of the extermination campaigns along the eastern front. The BND was quite literally started and run by one such Nazi - who prior to its formation, ran the entire European intelligence apparatus for CIA. When you get on an elevator and a kind old lady says "good morning"... do you snarl and yell WHAT THE !@#$ IS GOOD ABOUT IT!!!!! Must be total pure hell with a know-it-all like you. What do you do for a living? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts