Jump to content

Trump and Russia


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, PelotonBillsFan said:


Poor thing doesn’t even see how she’s been manipulated by the right stream media. 
 

thoughts and prayers to all of you gullible freaks
 

 

I was hoping for a healthy debate but you’re clearly not worth my time. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Do we really still have a Trump and Russia thread, even after Mueller’s own team said there was no collusion? Even after the unsealed documents now show no one ever said there was any collusion? Even after there’s nothing written or said by anyone close to or with knowledge of the Trump campaign ever said there was any collusion? Even after people went to PRISON but still never flipped to report of any collusion? And now even after the DNC is known to have zero evidence that Russia hacked Hillary’s stupid illegal server?
 

Can somebody PLEASE pick another country to start a fantasy conspiracy theory about? (Hint:  NOT the Ukraine, try again.)


You wish Mueller cleared Trump.

1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

Do you need a tissue? A hug? A safe space to go to?


no but you need to grow up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I was hoping for a healthy debate but you’re clearly not worth my time. 

 

Another alt identity screaming for attention she is no longer getting since her other identities are on most posters' ignore lists.... 

 

3 minutes ago, PelotonBillsFan said:

no but you need to grow up 

 

 

 

Edited by billsfan1959
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Is this about General Flynn? You are aware that he was essentially charged with starting taxpayer funded job a week early, right? That’s what set your hair on fire? Really? We now know he wasn’t charged with treason, or whatever you’re dreaming he was charged with. 

 

Yeah, no.  He lied to the FBI about activity that undermined the sitting United States government.  And pleaded guilty to that activity.  

 

***

 

From what little I know about this the judge presiding over the Flynn case pulled a lovely move yesterday.  Predictable to anyone who does this for a living, but hilarious nonetheless.  Just because the government wants to vacate the plea (and drop the prosecution) doesn't meant the court, which has jurisdiction over the matter, has to accede to the request.  Out. Freaking. Standing. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Yeah, no.  He lied to the FBI about activity that undermined the sitting United States government.  And pleaded guilty to that activity.  

 

***

 

From what little I know about this the judge presiding over the Flynn case pulled a lovely move yesterday.  Predictable to anyone who does this for a living, but hilarious nonetheless.  Just because the government wants to vacate the plea (and drop the prosecution) doesn't meant the court, which has jurisdiction over the matter, has to accede to the request.  Out. Freaking. Standing. 

 

Undermined...how?  And great, more taxpayer money wasted when Flynn will ultimately walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Undermined...how?  And great, more taxpayer money wasted when Flynn will ultimately walk.

 

Interesting.  An economic argument for not prosecuting crime.  Are there any other instances in which you would apply this theory?  The guy who burglarizes your house?  The person who steals from your car?  The bar assault where somebody sustains a broken arm?  Or is it just because you like Flynn's politics?

Edited by SectionC3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PelotonBillsFan said:


Your whole argument - everything you have plagiarized from your far right sources - is starting to crack. 
 


The opposite is happening. But to know that you’d have to have the first clue about what’s happening.  You’ve proven you don’t. And worse, you’re actively rooting for tyranny over the rule of law.

 

So I don’t give two ***** what you think, but I’ll happily expose you’re bull#### for what it is. 

2 hours ago, PelotonBillsFan said:


You wish Mueller cleared Trump.

 


Being able to read means no one has to wish. It’s what volume one loudly concludes. 

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

 


He lied to the FBI about activity that undermined the sitting United States government.  


Wrong. On both counts. Not even the government could prove he lied, let alone that it undermined anything. He was, in fact, cleared by the DOJ and FBI before that meeting ever took place. 
 

Facts aren’t your friends when you don’t know them. Which you don’t because you’re pushing long debunked fake news like the uninformed pissant you are. 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PelotonBillsFan said:


Think we should lay off the Obamagate and get us through Barrgate first?


Or at the very least - let’s wait for the  bodies of the 80,000+ dead Americans to cool down?

 

 

Experts said it would be 1-2 million, 80k is a success.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Interesting.  An economic argument for not prosecuting crime.  Are there any other instances in which you would apply this theory?  The guy who burglarizes your house?  The person who steals from your car?  The bar assault where somebody sustains a broken arm?  Or is it just because you like Flynn's politics?

 

I noticed you skipped the "undermined" part.  How convenient.  Considering you're allegedly not the one playing politics. :rolleyes:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:


The opposite is happening. But to know that you’d have to have the first clue about what’s happening.  You’ve proven you don’t. And worse, you’re actively rooting for tyranny over the rule of law.

 

So I don’t give two ***** what you think, but I’ll happily expose you’re bull#### for what it is. 


Being able to read means no one has to wish. It’s what volume one loudly concludes. 


Wrong. On both counts. Not even the government could prove he lied, let alone that it undermined anything. He was, in fact, cleared by the DOJ and FBI before that meeting ever took place. 
 

Facts aren’t your friends when you don’t know them. Which you don’t because you’re pushing long debunked fake news like the uninformed pissant you are. 

 

And yet volume II ends with no exoneration on obstruction. "Being able to read . . ."  I'll let you finish.  

 

On Flynn, last I checked he pleaded guilty to violation of 18 USC 1001.  The information underlying that plea alleges that Flynn made false statements to the FBI.  "Facts aren't your friends when you don't know them."  But that's to be expected when you're on the Washed up Psycho list. 

 

https://www.lawfareblog.com/michael-flynn-plea-agreement-documents

4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

I noticed you skipped the "undermined" part.  How convenient.  Considering you're allegedly not the one playing politics. :rolleyes:

 

https://www.lawfareblog.com/michael-flynn-plea-agreement-documents

 

Read and enjoy.  Paragraph 3d of the statement of offense (signed by Flynn and his counsels) is a pretty tough workaround for the fake news crowd here. 

Edited by SectionC3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

Experts said it would be 1-2 million, 80k is a success.

 

Which experts?  The same ones Trump now ignores?  If you consider 80k dead in this situation a success, then I can't help you. I'm sorry that you support a fake winner for president.  I demand better. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...