row_33 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Yes, after Obama didn't even swing his manpurse at Putin over Ukraine the Dems get so tough on lands nobody is willing to fight over with US blood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: CIA v DIA. Not russia v America. So its Russia vs America then, because you are always wrong. 1 minute ago, row_33 said: Yes, after Obama didn't even swing his manpurse at Putin over Ukraine the Dems get so tough on lands nobody is willing to fight over with US blood. What about all those sanctions that have so pissed off Putin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 .................... CNN IN MAY: Sessions failed to disclose meetings he had w/Russian ambassador/intended to mislead, evidence of collusion w/Russia. CNN TODAY: Sessions did what the FBI told him to do and did not mislead the DOJ about his meetings with Russians. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 6 hours ago, Tiberius said: What about all those sanctions that have so pissed off Putin? Obama lifted those in 2010. ...wait, which Democratic foreign policy are we talking about again? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Dem foreign policy, you mean: Peace at any Price? Please don’t hurt us Ayatollah? How many Billions of a bribe so you will build your nuclear arsenal quietly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: Dem foreign policy, you mean: Peace at any Price? Please don’t hurt us Ayatollah? No, it's "I'll give you pallets of cash if you promise not to yank on my tampon string". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 You got in just before my third one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 10 hours ago, DC Tom said: Obama lifted those in 2010. ...wait, which Democratic foreign policy are we talking about again? No, wrong. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/07/14/the-magnitsky-act-explained/?utm_term=.47d45edc93ec Don't you get sick of being an apologist for the Trump gang? Wait, no, of course you don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 THEY’VE GOT REASON: Trump Lawyers Want A Second Special Counsel: They want a probe into “obvious conflicts of interest” in the Department of Justice. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 17 minutes ago, B-Man said: THEY’VE GOT REASON: Trump Lawyers Want A Second Special Counsel: They want a probe into “obvious conflicts of interest” in the Department of Justice. . In other words Trump is obviously guilty and these clowns would rather rip up the system than face justice. Scum bags. And scum bags that support them. Spit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: No, wrong. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/07/14/the-magnitsky-act-explained/?utm_term=.47d45edc93ec Don't you get sick of being an apologist for the Trump gang? Wait, no, of course you don't http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/world/22sanctions.html Don't you get sick of being completely !@#$ing ignorant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/world/22sanctions.html Don't you get sick of being completely !@#$ing ignorant? Don't you get sick of pettifogging? This is just another example of your tired attempts to muddy the water Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 36 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Don't you get sick of pettifogging? This is just another example of your tired attempts to muddy the water i wouldn't call your brain muddy water, it's more of a cesspool. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 8 minutes ago, Gary M said: i wouldn't call your brain muddy water, it's more of a cesspool. Ya, well it's better than yours. Yours is more like used toilet paper floating in urine and turd. F you Trumpbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Don't you get sick of pettifogging? This is just another example of your tired attempts to muddy the water That wasn't pettifogging, that was clarifying my original post you were too stupid to understand... 14 hours ago, DC Tom said: Obama lifted those in 2010. ...wait, which Democratic foreign policy are we talking about again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 48 minutes ago, Gary M said: i wouldn't call your brain muddy water, it's more of a cesspool. there might be solid waste in a cesspool that can be recycled for fuel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 35 minutes ago, row_33 said: there might be solid waste in a cesspool that can be recycled for fuel You mean, burn gator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: You mean, burn gator? Burning gator would emit too much stupid into the atmosphere 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 (edited) One of the congressional leaders of The Resistance is California Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff, who not long after Hillary Clinton lost claimed if was a “fact” that “Russia hacked the election.” He’s since been trying to make real life match the Democrat narrative (unsuccessfully) and might be sensing he’s running out of time. Hence the panic: Quote Adam Schiff ✔@RepAdamSchiff I’m increasingly worried Republicans will shut down the House Intelligence Committee investigation at the end of the month. Here’s why: 1:32 PM - Dec 15, 2017 He follows this cry (for help) with EIGHT more tweets.........at the link https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2017/12/15/uh-oh-rep-adam-schiffs-trumprussia-meltdown-intensifies/ IT pretty much boils down to this: Schiff: I am very, very, very unhappy that I will not be allowed to conduct a permanent investigation of Donald Trump through the rest of his tenure-- even though endless witness, thousands of docs have so far turned up no collusion. https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/941737646807769088 … . Edited December 15, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 2 hours ago, B-Man said: One of the congressional leaders of The Resistance is California Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff, who not long after Hillary Clinton lost claimed if was a “fact” that “Russia hacked the election.” He’s since been trying to make real life match the Democrat narrative (unsuccessfully) and might be sensing he’s running out of time. Hence the panic: He follows this cry (for help) with EIGHT more tweets.........at the link https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2017/12/15/uh-oh-rep-adam-schiffs-trumprussia-meltdown-intensifies/ IT pretty much boils down to this: Schiff: I am very, very, very unhappy that I will not be allowed to conduct a permanent investigation of Donald Trump through the rest of his tenure-- even though endless witness, thousands of docs have so far turned up no collusion. https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/941737646807769088 … . I missed my Thursday prediction, but I'm pretty confident Schiff's fall is coming. I've heard it from too many different sources now to write it off... not sure if they'll nail him officially for leaking classified intel (which is a serious violation of the espionage act) or if they'll "scandal" him out (I've heard both). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts