BuffaloBud420 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 So...Rodgers is vastly overrated. Doesn't do much for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 So...Rodgers is vastly overrated. Doesn't do much for me.apparently Olivia agrees with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Olivia is 36 & has a lot of miles on her. He's trading her in for a newer version. Good move. And there are still people who think Rodgers is overrated? Are they the same people who believe the earth is flat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 will he reconcile with his family now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elite Poster Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) He also has a 90-45 record so yeah I'm sure the 25% of games he loses by "not being clutch" isn't a big deal. Tyrod has a horrible record trailing by 4 AT ANY POINT IN THE DAMN GAME. Not just the 4th quarter. Tebow is clutch. He has the highest 4th qtr tQBR ever. Tebow also has a career QBR of 45 so he's hot, steaming garbage for the other 3 quarters of the game. 45 isn't even in the top 200 for QBs all time. Edited April 7, 2017 by Elite Poster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 So...Rodgers is vastly overrated. Doesn't do much for me. "Vastly overrated" lol. Sure he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elite Poster Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 This thread is so aggravating. We are comparing a future HOF, super bowl winner, multiple time first team all-pro, who has thrown for 30+ TDs and 4000+ yards 6 times out of 9 years starting, to Tyrod who struggles to get 20 passing TDs and 3k yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 This thread is so aggravating. We are comparing a future HOF, super bowl winner, multiple time first team all-pro, who has thrown for 30+ TDs and 4000+ yards 6 times out of 9 years starting, to Tyrod who struggles to get 20 passing TDs and 3k yards. A A Ron doesn't win the SB every year! And he got rid of his aging actress girlfriend and will never get a date again! He's a bum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 I don't think anyone is comparing Rodgers and Taylor, the OP appears to be using the stat to show that it's a faulty measure of how good a QB can be, and instead it's probably better to take into account multiple different factors when forming an opinion on a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 The 4th quarter comeback stat can be misleading, but confidence in your QB to provide your team a chance in those situations is of enormous importance. Does anyone here really think Tyrod Taylor can be counted on to drive down the field late in the 4th quarter to beat a playoff caliber team? I sure don't. I'd happily put the ball in Aaron Rodger's hand though. Here is all I could find on the matter: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/comeback.cgi?player=RodgAa00 http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/comeback.cgi?player=TaylTy00 This Perception and confidence means a lot. Funny the OP list only winning records. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Finally I can make my play for Olivia...shes great at sexting I hear from the internet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Aaron's done okay with a rapidly decreasing talent pool around him. I've never bought that his coach was a "genius" as trumpeted by the media either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elite Poster Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Takes a special kind of stupid to say Bills had an average defense. 16th in points given up per game, 16th in total points given up, and 18th in yards per game, and finally 19th in total yards. It takes a special kind of stupid to think the Bills had anything BUT an average defense. Just about 100 yards (less than 10 per game) from being 16th in all of these stats; in other words, literally, dead center in the entire league. So what the heck is average in your world? Or is this some type of alternative fact? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBud420 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 "Vastly overrated" lol. Sure he is. I wonder what Brady or Roethlisberger record is while trailing in the 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 16th in points given up per game, 16th in total points given up, and 18th in yards per game, and finally 19th in total yards. It takes a special kind of stupid to think the Bills had anything BUT an average defense. Just about 100 yards (less than 10 per game) from being 16th in all of these stats; in other words, literally, dead center in the entire league. So what the heck is average in your world? Or is this some type of alternative fact? The bottom third of the NFL is rancid or crippled or totally incompetent, just beating that out is the lowest rental district of any definition of "average." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elite Poster Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) The bottom third of the NFL is rancid or crippled or totally incompetent, just beating that out is the lowest rental district of any definition of "average." The bottom third of the NFL is teams' 22-32 (because a third of 32 is about 10). In what world is 16th "just beating that out"? We were about a FG a game or a TD about every other game from being a top ten OR bottom ten scoring defense. That is literally average, one standard deviation (approximately) from the top and bottom. When we use statistics and statistical vocabulary, its important to make sure you understand what you are saying. EDIT: So I went ahead and calculated the standard deviation and true average for scoring defense in the NFL in 2016 because all these false narratives here drive me nuts. True StDv: 3.380230415414 True AVG: 22.771875 Therefore, our Bills were .5 points PER game from being statistically in the middle for points given up in 2016 and about a FG per game from being part of the top third. Edited April 7, 2017 by Elite Poster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddoublee Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 how is this thread not dead? its really not dead? how?? this is right up towards the top of all time stupidest threads...i try not throw that out there lightly. why wont it die??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 The bottom third of the NFL is teams' 22-32 (because a third of 32 is about 10). In what world is 16th "just beating that out"? We were about a FG a game or a TD about every other game from being a top ten OR bottom ten scoring defense. That is literally average, one standard deviation (approximately) from the top and bottom. When we use statistics and statistical vocabulary, its important to make sure you understand what you are saying. The problem is that the defense was incredibly inconsistent. The average PPG allowed is right there in the middle at 23.6, but they allowed 27 or more points in 8 of their 16 games, and 30 or more in 6 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) The bottom third of the NFL is teams' 22-32 (because a third of 32 is about 10). In what world is 16th "just beating that out"? We were about a FG a game or a TD about every other game from being a top ten OR bottom ten scoring defense. That is literally average, one standard deviation (approximately) from the top and bottom. When we use statistics and statistical vocabulary, its important to make sure you understand what you are saying. EDIT: So I went ahead and calculated the standard deviation and true average for scoring defense in the NFL in 2016 because all these false narratives here drive me nuts. True StDv: 3.380230415414 True AVG: 22.771875 Therefore, our Bills were .5 points PER game from being statistically in the middle for points given up in 2016 and about a FG per game from being part of the top third. I've gone a step further, and removed defensive and special teams TDs surrendered by each team, and here's how it looks: Mean Defensive PPG allowed: 21.764 STDEV for Defensive PPG allowed: 3.050 Bills' Defensive PPG allowed: 23.063 (ranks 20th in the league) Edited April 7, 2017 by thebandit27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 The problem is that the defense was incredibly inconsistent. The average PPG allowed is right there in the middle at 23.6, but they allowed 27 or more points in 8 of their 16 games, and 30 or more in 6 of them. Inconsistent or beat up on bad teams? The only team with a winning record that the Bills held to less than 20 was the Pats with Brissett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts