Jump to content

Jim Schwartz took Eagles 30th ranked defense to top 5


Yeezus

Recommended Posts

They took a team above .500 and brought them to .500. Not exactly a winning formula.

 

How many owners are instantly successful? How many owners find their long term GM, HC and QB in their first year of ownership?

 

It takes time to build a winner. And there will be some trial-and-error along the way. I have no idea if Terry and Kim will prove to be good owners. At this point, I can only hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think Gilmore, Darby, Seymour and Ro-Co would be the top 4 CB's in Philadelphia's rotation. :lol: White would probably crack the top 3 by himself as well.

 

So people who think our CB's suck ain't seen nothin'.

 

When he went all in on Leodis and Ron Brooks in free agency........guys the Bills couldn't eject fast enough......that said it all about the desperate situation in THEIR secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philly's D is 11th in yards against and 10th in points against.

 

So... pretty good.

 

All things considered for them as a whole though. They dumped maxwell, murray, and bradfords contracts. Moved up to get Wentz. Got the extra pick back from the bradford deal. They're set up nicely moving forward if Wentz develops.

 

So far - he looks fairly mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So... pretty good.

 

All things considered for them as a whole though. They dumped maxwell, murray, and bradfords contracts. Moved up to get Wentz. Got the extra pick back from the bradford deal. They're set up nicely moving forward if Wentz develops.

 

So far - he looks fairly mediocre.

 

 

Schwartz was a long-time mediocre DC and really isn't a great DC by any means now but the high roster turnover and lack of practice time afforded is favoring simpler, well executed schemes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shameless

 

Indisputable.

 

How many owners are instantly successful? How many owners find their long term GM, HC and QB in their first year of ownership?

 

It takes time to build a winner. And there will be some trial-and-error along the way. I have no idea if Terry and Kim will prove to be good owners. At this point, I can only hope.

Martha Ford's team is 8-4 this season.

 

The Bucs found Jameis in their first season.

 

The Titans' new owner took 2 years to find Mariota.

 

Those are the last 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indisputable.

Martha Ford's team is 8-4 this season.

 

The Bucs found Jameis in their first season.

 

The Titans' new owner took 2 years to find Mariota.

 

Those are the last 3.

 

Not hard to "find" a franchise QB when you pick in the top-2 and there are actually 2 available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Depends on the year. If they had the 1st overall next year, they wouldn't be getting a franchise guy.

That's what the Raiders probably thought in 2014, not with the 1st overall but with a top 5 pick.

 

Instead, they got a future HoFer AND a franchise guy.

Edited by jmc12290
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what the Raiders probably thought in 2014, not with the 1st overall but with a top 5 pick.

 

Instead, they got a future HoFer AND a franchise guy.

 

Carr was a 2nd rounder. Who is your Derek Carr for 2017?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Carr was a 2nd rounder. Who is your Derek Carr for 2017?

Could be Trubinsky or Mahomes.

 

The bottom line is having a high pick means you get very talented players and the pick of QB's. Getting a high doesn't mean you're screwed when there's no clear #1 overall. You just keep trying. It's that easy.

Edited by jmc12290
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be Trubinsky or Mahomes.

 

The bottom line is having a high pick means you get very talented players and the pick of QB's. Getting a high doesn't mean you're screwed when there's no clear #1 overall. You just keep trying. It's that easy.

 

It's easier said than done. For instance, in that 2014 draft, there were 3 QB's taken before Carr, none of whom are any great shakes. And if any of those 3 teams knew how good Carr would be, they'd have drafted him in the 1st. The Raiders are lucky that none of them did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's easier said than done. For instance, in that 2014 draft, there were 3 QB's taken before Carr, none of whom are any great shakes. And if any of those 3 teams knew how good Carr would be, they'd have drafted him in the 1st. The Raiders are lucky that none of them did.

Sure they are. Their consolation prize would've been Mack if someone else had taken Care. That's not bad.

 

It's easier said than done, but it's really not. Having a high 1st pick increases your chance of finding the best QB, on the whole. The logical approach is to lose enough games to maximize your chance of stumbling on a Winston, Mariota, Bridgewater, Carr, Wentz, Dak, Matty Ice, Stafford, Cam, Luck etc etc etc. Because the bottom line is that the team that picked after the Raiders 2nd pick in 2014 had a zero percent chance of drafting Carr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...