boyst Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Too late for what? how dare you ask 26 copy paste to have an original thought. That's like asking Tiberius his opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Why the left loses so much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Why the left loses so much... Lol what an a$$. I can grasp what they are saying the world " looks like" to them. It's still based largely on falsehoods and misperceptions. Things are not always as they appear. More libtard drivel posing as logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Why the left loses so much... You know, at this point I find it easier to say "Yes, yes I am a white supremacist" than to argue with these idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 You know, at this point I find it easier to say "Yes, yes I am a white supremacist" than to argue with these idiots. Not surprising Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share Posted September 27, 2017 FN Hypocrite Moron! @SInow One day after touting free speech, Jeff Sessions says the NFL should restrict players’ speech https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/09/27/jeff-sessions-nfl-national-anthem-protests On Tuesday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions gave a speech at Georgetown University in which he said, “Freedom of thought and speech on the American campus are under attack.” On Wednesday, he went on Fox News and said he believes the NFL should restrict players’ freedom of thought and speech. “In this great land, the government does not get to tell you what to think or what to say,” Sessions said in his speech on Tuesday. The government official then appeared on Fox & Friends Wednesday morning to tell NFL players what to do. “I think people should stand [for the national anthem],” Sessions said. “I think it should be a formal rule of the league. They’ll have to make that decision but they should be able to say to the players, if you on our field and play our game paid by us, you should respect the flag and the national anthem.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 so when this all dies down as a fad, will we finally get some decent football to watch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 FN Hypocrite Moron! @SInow One day after touting free speech, Jeff Sessions says the NFL should restrict players’ speech https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/09/27/jeff-sessions-nfl-national-anthem-protests Different forum. One is a university campus , most people there are students not employees. A protest there would likely have a counter protest. There is none allowed in the NFLs playground. Just what the players have to say. Universities often try to shut out the counter argument. Just like is being done in the NFL . Getting only one side of a story is a problem in a market of ideas. Saying the NFL ( an employer) should have rules that would be in its rights that the company and its employees stay out of politics is not hypocritical . The two scenarios are apples to oranges really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) Different forum. One is a university campus , most people there are students not employees. A protest there would likely have a counter protest. There is none allowed in the NFLs playground. Just what the players have to say. Universities often try to shut out the counter argument. Just like is being done in the NFL . Getting only one side of a story is a problem in a market of ideas. Saying the NFL ( an employer) should have rules that would be in its rights that the company and its employees stay out of politics is not hypocritical . The two scenarios are apples to oranges really. He's the AG of the United States. It's not his concern. Edited September 27, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 He's the AG of the United States. It's not his concern. I agree. Sort of like Obama and the "cops acting stupidly" right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share Posted September 27, 2017 I agree. Sort of like Obama and the "cops acting stupidly" right? Wrong. Many PDs receive Federal Funding and DOJ has oversight responsibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) This forum should put a one month trial moratorium on the "I know you are but what am I defense" that poisons every argument and thread. Just for one month to see if it promotes actual discussion. However many times the what about the Republicans when they did this or what about Obama never adds anything. Ever. Everyone already knows both sides do crazy ass stupid schit. But it's incredibly annoying that everything everyone brings up becomes what about Obama just like it was what about Bush until you tards hijacked this board. Edited September 27, 2017 by Kelly the Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 This forum should put a one month trial moratorium on the "I know you are but what am I defense" that poisons every argument and thread. Just for one month to see if it promotes actual discussion. However many times the what about the Republicans when they did this or what about Obama never adds anything. Ever. Everyone already knows both sides do crazy ass stupid schit. But it's incredibly annoying that everything everyone brings up becomes what about Obama just like it was what about Bush until you tards hijacked this board. In four to eight years everyone will be saying "at least (x) is better than Trump!" Round and round we go. Political parties no longer serve the interest of the people, they are tools of division wielded by the political class to assure the people are too busy fighting one another instead of solving the real issues we face as a country. IMO of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Wrong. Many PDs receive Federal Funding and DOJ has oversight responsibilities. all.teams receive Federal funding... Sooo, wipe the sides of your mouth and try again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 In four to eight years everyone will be saying "at least (x) is better than Trump!" Round and round we go. Political parties no longer serve the interest of the people, they are tools of division wielded by the political class to assure the people are too busy fighting one another instead of solving the real issues we face as a country. IMO of course. “The two party system is wonderful and terrific. It ensures fairness and legitimate representation of disparate viewpoints with checks and balances in place to further the healthy dialectic that nourishes our democracy.” - Nobody at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 “The two party system is wonderful and terrific. It ensures fairness and legitimate representation of disparate viewpoints with checks and balances in place to further the healthy dialectic that nourishes our democracy.” - Nobody at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 The US has had 3rd parties that directly changed the outcome of elections with Wallace in 1968 and Perot in 1992 and 1996. A third party system, like Canada (at federal and provincial levels) leads to majority governments formed with 32% of the vote and the US is too important to the world to play these Mickey Mouse games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 The US has had 3rd parties that directly changed the outcome of elections with Wallace in 1968 and Perot in 1992 and 1996. A third party system, like Canada (at federal and provincial levels) leads to majority governments formed with 32% of the vote and the US is too important to the world to play these Mickey Mouse games. So we get Agent Orange instead. Awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 “The two party system is wonderful and terrific. It ensures fairness and legitimate representation of disparate viewpoints with checks and balances in place to further the healthy dialectic that nourishes our democracy.” - Nobody at this point Looks like the Republicans are sliding off the deep end first. Roy Moore is a wing nut religious fanatic and Steve Bannon is going to push more of these crazies in primaries. They already own Trump. Plus there is a real lawlessness in the Republican party with a Judge Moore ignoring the law, Arpaio, this Senate trying to pass huge, major legislation without any hearings or anything. The Stealing of a supreme court pick and more. They elected more crazies and this lawlessness will only grow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts