Beerball Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Two good reads, thanks. Based on draft projections, does the team go OT or LB (inside) in the first and edge rusher in the second? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 There are currently some people in the NFL that are very good at evaluating college talent and some are actually excellent at it. First, you need a man at the top of the org chart who can recognize the people who are great at doing their job of scouting players. The Bills have had a few people like that over the years and one was HC Chuck Knox who hired Norm Pollom away from the Rams to join him in Buffalo as director of scouting for Buffalo. From there Pollom advised the hiring of a young man by the name of Bill Polian. Mind you the Bills still found and brought in some great talent under Chuck Know despite the standing GM being a complete moron in Stew Barber. Stew Barber was horrible. Horrible, horrible, horrible. With the 19th pick of the 2016 draft the Buffalo Bills select linebacker Stephen Hawking, Oxford University. Mike Mayock says that advanced analytics determined Hawking is one of the very few people capable of processing Rex's defensive scheme. Still, he has physical limitations which make him a major reach. No other team required this intelligence level at LB so Hawking may have even been available as a UDFA. What's his 40 time? Oh wait, with the whole space-time continuum thing he should be able to cover the entire field simultaneously so perhaps his 40 time is moot. Look forward to hearing him root on his Offensive teammates when he's resting on the sidelines. Should make the highlights on ESPN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Quint Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Interesting stuff. They should take it a few steps further to the genetic level and start splicing genes at inception to create LBs, CBs, and such. They could add in behavioral traits, too, so that these guys quit getting arrested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 I actually think Mario is an intelligent player, he's just a selfish entitled person who only wants to do what he wants to do. Mario: I need to be rushing the passer, not dropping into coverage. Fans: What a selfish, entitled jerk! He should do what the coaches tell him to do. Sammy: I need the ball thrown to me more. Fans: He's right! Those stupid coaches should get him the ball more! smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Mario: I need to be rushing the passer, not dropping into coverage. Fans: What a selfish, entitled jerk! He should do what the coaches tell him to do. Sammy: I need the ball thrown to me more. Fans: He's right! Those stupid coaches should get him the ball more! smh Sammy didn't dog it. It's that simple dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Mario: I need to be rushing the passer, not dropping into coverage. Fans: What a selfish, entitled jerk! He should do what the coaches tell him to do. Sammy: I need the ball thrown to me more. Fans: He's right! Those stupid coaches should get him the ball more! smh Fans are fans. If Rex left and Mario stayed they would all blame Rex. They want hope which is fine. If you blame Mario you increase hope and can even imagine that Rex is somehow competent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Mario: I need to be rushing the passer, not dropping into coverage. Fans: What a selfish, entitled jerk! He should do what the coaches tell him to do. Sammy: I need the ball thrown to me more. Fans: He's right! Those stupid coaches should get him the ball more! smh Show me a game where Sammy didnt half ass it You can plainly see Mario half assing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webster Guy Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Show me a game where Sammy didnt half ass it You can plainly see Mario half assing it Plus not only was Sammy correct, Mario was wrong. It IS necessary to drop back into passing lanes as a DE when one or both of these things are happening: 1. You are consistently getting handled by a right tackle and putting zero pressure on the qb. When your DC sees this, he's going to run zone blitzes to help you and the TEAM get pressure on the qb or at least disrupt timing. This is what guys like Rex, Pettine and Dick LeBeau do very well when they're calling a game. All DE's are asked to do this intermittently in the 3-4's as far as I can tell. For the record, Mario didn't get asked to drop that often, and it wasn't like he was getting consistent pressure on the qb this last season anyway. 2. The qb you're playing against (Brady, Eli, etc) is doing a three step drop and gunning the ball for quick passes, holding it less than 2.5 seconds every time, which means no matter HOW good you are at rushing the passer, you couldn't get to him even if you were unblocked. In that case, your best use is dropping back into a passing lane and disrupting the timing of the qb with your 6 foot 6 wingspan. If you don't think dropping DE's once in awhile is a good idea, you don't understand the game. Its proven, and it works against guys like Brady as it did in the second game when we played great defense, good enough to win in their house if the offense would have converted a few more points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Fans are fans. If Rex left and Mario stayed they would all blame Rex. They want hope which is fine. If you blame Mario you increase hope and can even imagine that Rex is somehow competent. I'm not there yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 I'm not there yet. Start hating Mario even more. Come to the board and call him all sorts of names. Make fun of his engagement ring fiasco. Before long you may, despite years of evidence to the contrary, envision Rex capable of tying his own shoes.....or at least connecting the velcro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 (edited) Sammy didn't dog it. It's that simple dude. If Sammy didn't get his targets would he have dogged it? We don't know, but that's the big difference between the two situations. The coaches gave one of those guys what they wanted after they bitched to the media, but not the other. For the record I thought both were right in what they said, but wrong by taking it out of the locker room. And Mario sure as hell shouldn't have dogged it, but I'm not going to sit here and assume Sammy would have reacted better or worse if he didn't get what he wanted. Edited April 25, 2016 by BarleyNY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Stew Barber was horrible. Horrible, horrible, horrible. Over rated OT as well. Good stuff here, folks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinii Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 all have a direct correlation to the production, or potential of an edge rusher, while the 40-yard dash is essentially meaningless. The quote above is from the aforementioned link and is not a new idea. I think it was Ditka who summed it up rather well when he said, "I don't care how fast he is. I want to know how fast can he get to the football". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 The reason the draft is a crap shoot and it's hard to quantify (predict) a good player is because these measures and models don't take into count the human condition. They don't account for personality, motivation, personal lives, what millions of dollars will do to someone, how hard they work, intelligence (the most underrated measure in the NFL IMO). This is where the quantitative revolution in the NFL isn't really much of a revolution. Other issues that impact player success is how well they fit the new scheme they get drafted into (lots of players get drafted in skill and the idea they can be fit into a system only to fail) and how much opportunity they get, which is interesting because teams treat late round picks as expendable and cut them quickly, rather than allowing them to develop due to the need to win now. Good read earlier this week, can't remember where, on how the draft is just a roulette machine basically and no GM is good at it. Mapping out the human brain to answer a lot of those potential character questions is just a matter of time. When you are in management long enough you learn that there aren't really billions of unique personalities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rquinn619 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Mapping out the human brain to answer a lot of those potential character questions is just a matter of time. When you are in management long enough you learn that there aren't really billions of unique personalities. all have a direct correlation to the production, or potential of an edge rusher, while the 40-yard dash is essentially meaningless. The quote above is from the aforementioned link and is not a new idea. I think it was Ditka who summed it up rather well when he said, "I don't care how fast he is. I want to know how fast can he get to the football". I didn't mean to say that as I was making some bold statement and I didn't intend for the article to say "only draft these players." if it came off that way I apologize. With the new information available and the "analytics wave" I thought it'd be an interesting tool to look at considering the amount of players that had success vs. those that didn't. This isn't to say that tape/character/effort, etc. doesn't matter, but more as a supplement to film study to sort of confirm what your eyes see. . There will always be outliers, but I don't think it's a coincidence that the best pass rushers based on sack totals are generally fantastic athletes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts