Liberal Protests

[Buffalo_Gal]

Instructions on how this $10 tool will allow these "peaceful protesters" to smash car windows, cut seat belts, and rip people from their vehicles so they "cannot get away."
 

 

Edited July 7, 2020 by Buffalo_Gal

[BillsFanNC]

2 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

 

With Trump's name written all over it

 

 

Not surprised at all that the irony of this is totally lost on you.

 

Warning signs of TDS:

 

Trump is always, without question, wrong.

 

Agreeing with Trump in even the smallest way makes you a racist, a nazi etc.

 

Now matter how innocuous, anything Trump does is to be condemned and is further proof that he's a racist bigot.

 

Members of the resistance are beyond obsessed with Trump 24/7.

 

Whatever the media tells you to think about Trump, despite having been proven wrong countless times over the last 3.5 years, is still unquestionably the truth. 

 

Seek help yesterday. 

 

 

[Uncle Joe]

41 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Instructions on how this $10 tool will allow these "peaceful protesters" to smash care windows, cut seat belts, and rip people from their vehicles so they "cannot get away."
 

 

Yep, use a tool made to save lives to harm others.

[B-Man]

 

[MILFHUNTER#518]

3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Instructions on how this $10 tool will allow these "peaceful protesters" to smash car windows, cut seat belts, and rip people from their vehicles so they "cannot get away."
 

 

She had better hope the driver doesn't have a "tool" of their own....

 

 

 

In other news, this is happening right across the Collar City Bridge from me...

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/watch-protesters-storm-baptist-church-harass-children-assault-parishioners-hows-your-head-feel-pastor?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro

Edited July 7, 2020 by MILFHUNTER#518

[B-Man]

Jemele Hill Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Black Lives Matter

 

Black Lives Matter has become a major point of contention in the ongoing culture war. The organization, which has taken center stage following over a month of protests, many turning violent and destructive, has been stretched and skewed into something they don’t even claim to be themselves. Mainstream forces have sought to piggyback off their “movement,” largely for political reasons.

 

As I’ve written previously, this is all a mirage. The BLM organization continues to hold awful, radical views . They are open about their Marxist ideology,  their anti-family views, and their views on abortion, among many other objectionable stances. The idea that they’ve been rehabilitated into an acceptable entity doesn’t pass muster.

 

Regardless, the attempts to excuse their behavior and viewpoints have become a bit of a sport among supposed journalists and their outfits. Enter Jemele Hill, who said the quiet part out loud about BLM this morning.

 

 

It’s what she says after this that gives the game away, but I’ll note that Chicago is not lacking for “gun control.” Hill knows this but needs to be spared from calling out the real issue, which is rampant crime and disrespect for life in some of these communities.

 

I’ll also note that it’s “martial” law, not “marshal” law. Thus is the academic depth at The Atlantic these days though.

 

{snip}

 

 

I guess she doesn’t realize how awful of an analogy that is, which is surprising. The organization is literally called “Black Lives Matter.” That would denote all black lives holding value to any normal onlooker. Further, BLM never claims to be a singularly focused group. You can go read their website yourself.

 

But Hill is saying what many of us realized long ago. BLM isn’t about all black lives. It’s a political and revolutionary movement. The reason they focus on police violence (when they aren’t preoccupied with the myriad of other issues people claim they don’t have the time to focus on) is not because they uniquely understand the danger of government abuse. It’s because it’s the perfect wedge to batter the system, which they readily admit they want to take down. What doesn’t give them that wedge is caring about and protesting over an 8-year-old black girl being shot. That’s why they ignore those issues.

 

That’s not to say that people who casually follow the BLM movement don’t care about those issues, but the organization itself, which is flush with hundreds of millions of dollars, has done almost nothing to address the murder rates in the black community.

 

Some will say they are allowed to have a focus and that they simply can’t cover every issue. One, you’d think the issue taking by far the most lives would be a priority, but regardless, this is an organization that has time for almost everything else. They’ve got time to stump for black trans-gender ***** issues. They can rally for abortion. They can promote Marxism and black power dynamics. But they simply can’t divide their focus enough to put a spotlight on black children being murdered by members of their communities?

 

No one should buy that because it’s absolute nonsense. If BLM were really about black lives, they’d be targeting their focus to impact and save the greatest amount of black lives, from police brutality to kids being murdered. They aren’t, though, because it doesn’t fit their political narrative and goals. It’s that simple.

 

 

 

.

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

‘What he being detained for?’

Mostly peaceful Black Lives Matter protester punches black Trump supporter right in front of the cops

 

 

 

 

[Rob's House]

No surprises here.

 

Narcissists, Psychopaths, and Manipulators Are More Likely To Engage in 'Virtuous Victim Signaling,' Says Study.

 

https://reason.com/2020/07/07/narcissists-psychopaths-and-manipulators-are-more-likely-to-engage-in-virtuous-victim-signaling-says-study/

[Rob's House]

 

[wppete]

 

[B-Man]

 

[SectionC3]

21 hours ago, GG said:

 

You mean things that happened over 100 years ago, as opposed to the modern days anarchists/Marxists who physically take over public and private property to declare autonomous zones?

 

Do you own a functioning mirror?  And what does it show?

 

 

 

I'm guessing you're ignoring the precedent set by a certain POTUS who was in charge in 2014-2015 when these policies were put in place?  Never mind that the people you are referring to are not citizens or legal aliens living in the US, and are not entitled to all the protections of US law.  You'd figure even a 3rd rate lawyer would know that.

 

It appears that the intellectual standard bearer of this alt wrong community is unfamiliar with Jim Crow laws, the civil rights movement of the 1960s, and the Wallace-style presidential campaign that he now supports.  

10 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

And demanding equality after approximately 400 years isn't marxist.  Or nihilist. Or facist.  Or the musing of an anarchist.  It's consistent with the political principles upon which this country was founded and to which it aspires (but has not perfected).  It's also consistent with the teachings of Jesus.  

[Keukasmallies]

 

 

 

Can someone please explain to me how pancake syrup, movies, books, statues, logos and buildng names weren't racist when Obama was President?

[BillStime]

46 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

It appears that the intellectual standard bearer of this alt wrong community is unfamiliar with Jim Crow laws, the civil rights movement of the 1960s, and the Wallace-style presidential campaign that he now supports.  

 

And demanding equality after approximately 400 years isn't marxist.  Or nihilist. Or facist.  Or the musing of an anarchist.  It's consistent with the political principles upon which this country was founded and to which it aspires (but has not perfected).  It's also consistent with the teachings of Jesus.  

 

So Marxism is the new caravans?

[SectionC3]

14 minutes ago, Keukasmallies said:

 

 

 

Can someone please explain to me how pancake syrup, movies, books, statues, logos and buildng names weren't racist when Obama was President?

 

Some of those things were.  It doesn't change the fact that they're racist now.  So you can cling to your statutes of Robert E. Lee, or you can get with the moment and recognize that they subjugate the people you cheer for on Sunday.  

[Keukasmallies]

10 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Some of those things were.  It doesn't change the fact that they're racist now.  So you can cling to your statutes of Robert E. Lee, or you can get with the moment and recognize that they subjugate the people you cheer for on Sunday.  

 

And you can delude yourself that the political party that has subjugated black for years offers a path to sunshine if only Joe Biden is elected President and Democrats control the Congress.  It didn't happen when they had control of the government in past years and it won't happen this time either.  Food stamps and cell phones don't lead to a united nation.

[TakeYouToTasker]

28 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

So Marxism is the new caravans?

No.  It’s the old Marxism.

[B-Man]

Not All Black Lives Matter to Black Lives Matter

This week, CNN's Don Lemon, who has spent the last few weeks bashing the supposed thoroughgoing systemic racism of the United States, hosted black actor Terry Crews. He then proceeded to browbeat Crews, who had committed the great sin of tweeting, "#ALLBLACKLIVESMATTER

 

9 black CHILDREN killed by violence in Chicago since June 20, 2020." Lemon specifically objected to Crews' hashtag. After Lemon humbly informed Crews that he has skin "as tough as an armadillo," he then lectured: "The Black Lives Matter movement was started because it was talking about police brutality. ...

 

But that's not what Black Lives Matter is about. It's not ... all-encompassing ... The Black Lives Matter movement is about police brutality and injustice in that matter, not about what's happening in black neighborhoods."

 

This, of course, is largely false. The Black Lives Matter movement did indeed begin with protests about police brutality but quickly morphed into broader debates over the validity of looting and rioting, tearing down historic statues, slavery reparations and defunding the police. And Black Lives Matter, as Crews correctly pointed out, has never restricted its mandate to the question of police violence: It has announced that its focuses also include police brutality, transgender rights, gay rights, disrupting the nuclear family and freeing Palestine, among other diverse topics.

 

So why is Lemon so deeply invested in preventing conversations about black lives? Why, in fact, do only some black lives matter, rather than all?

 

That's not merely a question asked by conservatives or contrarians. It's being asked all over the United States by black Americans being left to the predations of criminals, in large part thanks to the woke virtue signaling of many Black Lives Matter leaders and media allies.

 

In Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser emblazoned the enormous yellow words "BLACK LIVES MATTER" on 16th Street. Protesters quickly added "DEFUND THE POLICE."

 

One month later, 11-year-old Davon McNeal was shot in the head while heading to a family cookout on July 4. His grandfather, John Ayala, lamented: "We're protesting for months, for weeks, saying, 'Black Lives Matter. Black Lives Matter.' Black lives matter it seems like, only when a police officer shoots a black person. What about all the black-on-black crime that's happening in the community?"

 

McNeal was just one of the latest victims of a wave of violence gripping America's major cities. Last weekend, at least 89 people were shot in Chicago, leaving at least 17 dead. Shootings in Philadelphia have spiked 67%. In the first week of June, Los Angeles saw a shocking 250% increase in murders from the prior week. New York City's shootings have skyrocketed 44% over last year's numbers; every person shot there the week of June 29 -- 101 -- was from a minority community. It turns out that the agenda of Black Lives Matter, which includes fighting against the prevalence of police -- a call taken up by Democratic mayors and city councils around the United States -- endangers black lives far more than the presence of police.

 

Yet these lives don't particularly matter for Black Lives Matter advocates, apparently. Black lives matter when we're talking about police brutality. But Don Lemon has no airtime each night for those who seek to talk about threats to black lives that dwarf in severity problems related to policing -- and that are just as newsworthy. Indeed, the statistical case is unassailable that the daily murder of minority youths in America's major cities is far more newsworthy than the latest cable panel discussion of "white fragility" or the "power of whiteness."

 

But our current Black Lives Matter moment isn't about Davon McNeal, even if the wages of Black Lives Matter's recommended policies are death for those left unprotected by law enforcement. All that matters for too many in our elite institutions is the narrative that America's systems are the greatest obstacle to black Americans. And not all lives lost are equally valuable in promoting that perverse narrative.

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/2020/07/08/not-all-black-lives-matter-to-black-lives-matter-n2572074

 

 

[GG]

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

It appears that the intellectual standard bearer of this alt wrong community is unfamiliar with Jim Crow laws, the civil rights movement of the 1960s, and the Wallace-style presidential campaign that he now supports.  

 

Sure, fall back on the familiar trope and ignore the increasingly vocal crowd advocating for an open revolution.

 

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

And demanding equality after approximately 400 years isn't marxist.  Or nihilist. Or facist.  Or the musing of an anarchist.  It's consistent with the political principles upon which this country was founded and to which it aspires (but has not perfected).  It's also consistent with the teachings of Jesus.  

 

When it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck.