Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I'm listening, who else is there to trust? No one answers. 

 

I was hoping this old thread would come in handy. 

If you are serious, start here:

 

On 3/27/2019 at 9:55 AM, Hedge said:

I am fully aware that there are many regulars on PPP who don't need this advice. Perhaps, however, this will help some of the lurkers, should they be coming across this same situation I am. And with what I *think* is going to be happening in the next few months, there may be a lot more confused people, flailing to try and make sense of what is occurring.

 

With the recent summary release of the Mueller report, I have had numerous discussions with friends, family, and co-workers who are a little bit shell shocked as to the findings. During the course of our discussions, it was not at all uncommon for some of them to say "Well, I'm going to go see what CNN says about it.".  When I question why they are willingly running back to the outlet that has been blatantly lying to them for years, the typical response is an incredulous, "Where else should i go?". 

 

I do not give blanket statements of support to any publication, but below I have put together a list of sources I typically will provide of those who nailed the Mueller Report. I also think it's important to keep the list fairly short.

 

These are ordered alphabetically by first name (Journalist : Association : Twitter):

 

I am also just including their Twitter, since they self-promote their pieces.

 

It's also important to know your audience, as the majority of people who get their "news" from CNN, will turn off any willingness to listen when they hear  any major association to Fox NewsBut, for those willing to be yelled at yet for 50 minutes, I also include:

  • Sean Hannity 
  • Tucker Carlson 

 

Here is another one who almost made my list, but I think he is to screechy to introduce to people who are just now waking up to the truth:

 

I am curious, however, if any of you were to swap out sources in my initial list of 6, who would you replace them with?

 

*****************************************************************************************************

***Below is a work in progress and contains other source suggestions from our PPP community***

 

Individuals:

 

Specific Articles/Other Sources mentioned within this thread::

 

Helpful Posts/Articles/Videos compiled from other threads within our PPP community, as well as outiside sources:

 

Transcripts from the House Judiciary Committee:

 

Other Documents:

 

Other Twitter Follows:

 

Notable Twitter threads:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Attorney General William Barr's Press Conference the morning the Mueller Report was publicly made available. No Collusion. No Obstruction.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Been in power for over 40 years.... now he's going to do something about it. 

(after signing the crime bill, after threatening that people were about to be "put back in chains", after aiding segregationists)

 

BEST

VOTE

PANDERING

EVER!!!! 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I'm listening, who else is there to trust? No one answers. 

Yourself and your own reading comprehension of primary source documents. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

BEST

VOTE

PANDERING

EVER!!!! 

 

 

....well days 4-100 will be in the West Wing Nursing Home-Dimentia Unit....VP Harris will be running the show..............

  • Sad 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Magox said:

@Jauronimo  I suppose you will retract your statement?

 

Considering we now have an official statement from the United States Park Police

 

 

Here is the full quote.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  7 hours ago, Sig1Hunter said:


bingo. This is why it was ok for police to gas and flashbang the “peaceful protest” in Washington DC. Because even if it was peaceful, it was very likely still illegal. I doubt there was a permit, and even if there was I doubt the permit allowed them to block streets. 

Get your paperwork in order or the police have carte blanche to breakup your peaceful protest?  That doesn't sound like protecting or serving.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I made a simple point that just because the police can use force in dispersing crowds (in this instance protests we're referring to as generally all DC protests) doesn't mean that's the best course of action. And for the rest of the day I have responded to mostly comments that I have not made and the general aspersions as to why I have been silent in this thread on every other pertinent matter (because I don't spend as much time as I used to in this time suck).

 

This call out just cements the fact that no one bothered to read or comprehend my initial comment.

 

What bearing does your specific situation have on my point that I would consider retracting?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Magox said:

@Jauronimo  I suppose you will retract your statement?

 

Considering we now have an official statement from the United States Park Police

 

 

 

Even if they had used Tear gas, I still wouldn't had been outraged about it considering the circumstances.  We are in times of the most lawlessness that we have seen in our life times and the situation is still not under control.

 

 

 

 

...LMAO...retract?...seriously?...he's equally impressive on the football side.................

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

I was hoping this old thread would come in handy. 

If you are serious, start here:

 

 

 

 

....Jesus Mary ,Hedge...we have some here who have yet to finish "See Spot Run" and you expect them to digest THIS list?......wishful thinking............

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

I mean they're all part of the media, are they not? 

 

 

 

Anything that gets posted online (text or videos) or printed and distributed could be, yes. 

And I am not sure why I am bothering, because it's highly likely that you aren't considering actually doing any leg work, but what specific media were you referencing? I would highly bet it's none of the sources I listed, because if it was you wouldn't be so lost.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Here is the full quote.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  7 hours ago, Sig1Hunter said:


bingo. This is why it was ok for police to gas and flashbang the “peaceful protest” in Washington DC. Because even if it was peaceful, it was very likely still illegal. I doubt there was a permit, and even if there was I doubt the permit allowed them to block streets. 

Get your paperwork in order or the police have carte blanche to breakup your peaceful protest?  That doesn't sound like protecting or serving.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I made a simple point that just because the police can use force in dispersing crowds (in this instance protests we're referring to as generally all DC protests) doesn't mean that's the best course of action. And for the rest of the day I have responded to mostly comments that I have not made and the general aspersions as to why I have been silent in this thread on every other pertinent matter (because I don't spend as much time as I used to in this time suck).

 

This call out just cements the fact that no one bothered to read or comprehend my initial comment.

 

What bearing does your specific situation have on my point that I would consider retracting?

 

How many of these violent protests started out peaceful?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

 

....Jesus Mary ,Hedge...we have some here who have yet to finish "See Spot Run" and you expect them to digest THIS list?......wishful thinking............

 

He did ask. :beer:

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

Anything that gets posted online (text or videos) or printed and distributed could be, yes. 

And I am not sure why I am bothering, because it's highly likely that you aren't considering actually doing any leg work, but what specific media were you referencing? I would highly bet it's none of the sources I listed, because if it was you wouldn't be so lost.

I actually do follow a few of the names you listed, not because I agree with everything they say but because I like to to get as much information as possible from many different sources.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Warren Zevon said:

Thousands protesting peacefully right now in Washington DC. How long until Barr sticks the cops on them, too?

 

 

Hopefully soon because the pillaging and violence that follows is getting old.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said:

Thousands protesting peacefully right now in Washington DC. How long until Barr sticks the cops on them, too?

 

 

 

...if he knows you're in the front of the pack, IMMEDIATELY..............

18 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

How many of these violent protests started out peaceful?  

 

 

...and how many skids of bricks were conveniently available for these "peaceful protests"?......in construction, we call it "material staging"......

×
×
  • Create New...