Utah John Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Tyrod Taylor played great in relief, after starting QB Matt Cassel went to the bench after taking the first snap of the game. Well, isn't that what happened? Why would the Bills do something like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Tyrod Taylor played great in relief, after starting QB Matt Cassel went to the bench after taking the first snap of the game. Well, isn't that what happened? Why would the Bills do something like that? Because our franchise qbs first win should be against the pats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Technically they are both 1-0. The Bills should be 2-0. They both started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 That's a good question. As it so happens, Rob Johnson still gets credit for a "win" against Indy in 1998 despite the fact that he played for 3 plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Thanks, Tim Graham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 he did manage the game well. hand off to McCoy then sit on the bench for the rest of the day. he didn't make any big plays but he also didn't make any mistakes. i think that's what we wanted out of Cassel all along so bravo well done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 The league doesn't know who to give credit for the win to! Check it out:Taylor: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TaylTy00.htm Cassel: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CassMa00.htm Tannehill: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TannRy00.htm Check out the "QB Rec" tab. Neither Taylor nor Cassel is credited with a win, but both were starters. Tannehill gets credit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Thanks, Tim Graham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 (edited) The league doesn't know who to give credit for the win to! Check it out: Taylor: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TaylTy00.htm Cassel: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CassMa00.htm Tannehill: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TannRy00.htm Check out the "QB Rec" tab. Neither Taylor nor Cassel is credited with a win, but both were starters. Tannehill gets credit. huh? Am I reading this wrong? G & GS for TT Buf 1 and 1 Edited September 14, 2015 by BillsFan-4-Ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted September 14, 2015 Author Share Posted September 14, 2015 huh? Am I reading this wrong? G & GS for TT Buf 1 and 1 You're reading it right, but the Matt Cassel page says the same thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris heff Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Tyrod Taylor played great in relief, after starting QB Matt Cassel went to the bench after taking the first snap of the game. Well, isn't that what happened? Why would the Bills do something like that? Funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveFreeman22 Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 It might have been an incentive in Cassel's contract,like if he starts at least one game he gets some guaranteed money. Maybe they dd him a solid after cutting him and re-signing him at a lower cost,but still saves them money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 According to NFL.com, they both got credit for the start. I wonder if they're doing this as a way to appease Cassel? I sure hope not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 According to NFL.com, they both got credit for the start. I wonder if they're doing this as a way to appease Cassel? I sure hope not. Why not? If it gets him some of his cash back and they push the cap hit to next year, then it shows the team cares about the players. This type of word gets around and will get other players to look well on the Bills. unlike the FJ thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobillsinytown Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 it's to confuse Brady. Apparently Dreamboat was watching the game so maybe he'll get so confused that he'll throw 9 pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Technically they are both 1-0. The Bills should be 2-0. They both started. That's a good question. As it so happens, Rob Johnson still gets credit for a "win" against Indy in 1998 despite the fact that he played for 3 plays. I don't believe the NFL assigns wins to ANY player, even the QB. Try to find QB wins and losses among official NFL stat records---the last time I check, they didn't exist. Coaches ARE assigned wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah John Posted September 14, 2015 Author Share Posted September 14, 2015 (edited) The FJ thing worked out a lot better for FJ than it might have, after all. I'm sure he took a big cut in pay, and he has to move his family, but he went to an NFL team that is going to use him. Beats getting cut in the last roster reduction, which is what probably would have happened. I love FJ as a player. One of my top 5 favorite Bills, and I can remember back to the 1964 team. I wish the Bills could have won the SB with FJ on the roster. But the talent on the field could be better with him gone, as much as I hate suggesting that. Getting back toward the topic, I don't think the players around the league will shun the Bills because they cut a 34 year old RB who managed to get signed by the Seahawks. Getting back all the way to the topic, does anyone know for sure that Cassel gets extra cash for this play? Edited September 14, 2015 by Utah John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It's in My Blood Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 The FJ thing worked out a lot better for FJ than it might have, after all. I'm sure he took a big cut in pay, and he has to move his family, but he went to an NFL team that is going to use him. Beats getting cut in the last roster reduction, which is what probably would have happened. I love FJ as a player. One of my top 5 favorite Bills, and I can remember back to the 1964 team. I wish the Bills could have won the SB with FJ on the roster. But the talent on the field could be better with him gone, as much as I hate suggesting that. Getting back toward the topic, I don't think the players around the league will shun the Bills because they cut a 34 year old RB who managed to get signed by the Seahawks. Getting back all the way to the topic, does anyone know for sure that Cassel gets extra cash for this play? Just a quick correction...FJ didn't move his family. His kids started scool here this year. He'll join the ranks of Kelly and Thurman as far as community involvement goes after he retires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Caveman Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 huh? Am I reading this wrong? G & GS for TT Buf 1 and 1 You're reading it right, but the Matt Cassel page says the same thing! Cause they both started. They were both on the field for the opening play, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Rex commented on the opening play in his post game presser saying that it was one of their best plays at camp and was talking everyone up about it. It was pretty funny watching him talk about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Cause they both started. They were both on the field for the opening play, right? Yes, Tyrod was our starting WR and Woods was not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalScotts Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 LEAST of my concerns, he's not catching Brady or Favre and really who cares Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt in KC Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 You would think "games started" might well be one of the bases of Cassel's conditional salary bonus. . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Laugh all you like, but he was ALL OVER THIS on Twitter last night like the punch bowl-pooping dick he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Laugh all you like, but he was ALL OVER THIS on Twitter last night like the punch bowl-pooping dick he is. Seriously?? I figured you were just goofing. What an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Laugh all you like, but he was ALL OVER THIS on Twitter last night like the punch bowl-pooping dick he is. Just one of many reasons I completely ignore Twitter. Too many blowhards thinking their every stupid thought is important enough to share with the world. Even stupider are the people who "follow" these morons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Seriously?? I figured you were just goofing. What an idiot. Yeah, he's awful. It's like him and Rodak are in some sort of Troll Royale. Just one of many reasons I completely ignore Twitter. Too many blowhards thinking their every stupid thought is important enough to share with the world. Even stupider are the people who "follow" these morons. I have a list I follow on HootSuite of Bills Media. He's out of the rotation, mostly because he'll end up spamming the feed with his lame attempts at insulting his followers. He only shows up when one of my guys RT's him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I have a list I follow on HootSuite of Bills Media. He's out of the rotation, mostly because he'll end up spamming the feed with his lame attempts at insulting his followers. He only shows up when one of my guys RT's him. I recognize those as English words, but I have no freaking idea what they mean. Nor do I need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 I recognize those as English words, but I have no freaking idea what they mean. Nor do I need to. Haha, fair enough. I think it's a system that would work nicely for you, curates what you want, filters what you don't. But hey, old dogs, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 (edited) Haha, fair enough. I think it's a system that would work nicely for you, curates what you want, filters what you don't. But hey, old dogs, I guess. Indeed. I know I'm a trow-back, but I don't need my world curated. I'm a damn fine curator of my own world. I don't want or need suggestions from youtube. Can't stand "targeted advertising" as it is NEVER what I'm looking for. Don't need Amazon to make suggestions for me, based on my searches. I am perfectly capable of finding thing I need, on my own. I actually prefer it that way--as even I don't always know what I might want or like, before it happens. Edited September 14, 2015 by The Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Indeed. I know I'm a trow-back, but I don't need my world curated. I'm a damn fine curator of my own world. I don't want or need suggestions from youtube. Can't stand "targeted advertising" as it is NEVER what I'm looking for. Don't need Amazon to make suggestions for me, based on my searches. I am perfectly capable of finding thing I need, on my own. I actually prefer it that way--as even I don't always know what I might want or like, before it happens. All of this. Plus, I want to watch the people who try to tell me what is "trending" to die slowly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Indeed. I know I'm a trow-back, but I don't need my world curated. I'm a damn fine curator of my own world. I don't want or need suggestions from youtube. Can't stand "targeted advertising" as it is NEVER what I'm looking for. Don't need Amazon to make suggestions for me, based on my searches. I am perfectly capable of finding thing I need, on my own. I actually prefer it that way--as even I don't always know what I might want or like, before it happens. While I rarely benefit all the targeting you allude to, I fully welcome it with open arms. All of this. Plus, I want to watch the people who try to tell me what is "trending" to die slowly. Don't worry, they will. They'll reach life expectancy in about 60, 65 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts