YoloinOhio Posted April 8, 2015 Author Share Posted April 8, 2015 Throwing him in with our first, probably.yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACTOBILLSFAN Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 But Maziel didnt go to Oregon?! CBF But he did commit to Oregon before being talked into A&M by his mom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Per Lacanfora, the Browns have lobbed this trade idea to the eagles, but the Eagles aren't too interested in Manziel The Browns have gotta be "that guy" in your fantasy league who offers Rivers & Gates for Luck & Gronk and tells people he almost traded for Luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfk Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 EJ for Bradford...yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 I feel bad for Bradford. he's just a pawn in Chip's evil game to take over the world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJDK Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Chip Kelly is like a 12 year old jacked up on pixie sticks and Peeps playing Madden for the first time.this is so right on!I wonder what the Vegas odds are on Bradford being on the Eagles roster at the start of the season. I'd give it 31-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BmarvB Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Somehow, I very highly doubt that. Chip ain't smoking that much bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 I know it's just conjecture, but... Trade Foles and a fifth for Bradford and a fourth, trade Bradford (and presumably picks) for Manziel and a first round pick (at least), trade Manziel and two first-rounders to move up to select Mariotta. So that's Foles, a fifth, and two firsts, for Mariotta. Suddenly, the EJ Manuel deal doesn't seem that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 I know it's just conjecture, but... Trade Foles and a fifth for Bradford and a fourth, trade Bradford (and presumably picks) for Manziel and a first round pick (at least), trade Manziel and two first-rounders to move up to select Mariotta. So that's Foles, a fifth, and two firsts, for Mariotta. Suddenly, the EJ Manuel deal doesn't seem that bad. And a second in 2016 for Bradford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 And a second in 2016 for Bradford. In three years, the Eagles are going to be far more than a train wreck. More like "train crossing a bridge that a barge hits, while a plane crashes on the train, in the middle of a hurricane." Too bad it's not the Pats. I kinda have a soft spot for the Eagles, given they're the only NFC East team we didn't lose a Superbowl to... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 In three years, the Eagles are going to be far more than a train wreck. More like "train crossing a bridge that a barge hits, while a plane crashes on the train, in the middle of a hurricane." Too bad it's not the Pats. I kinda have a soft spot for the Eagles, given they're the only NFC East team we didn't lose a Superbowl to... The Bradford trade really was unbelievably unacceptable. It's not talked about enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BmarvB Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 In three years, the Eagles are going to be far more than a train wreck. More like "train crossing a bridge that a barge hits, while a plane crashes on the train, in the middle of a hurricane." Too bad it's not the Pats. I kinda have a soft spot for the Eagles, given they're the only NFC East team we didn't lose a Superbowl to... I would have to agree. I think the Eagles are gonna be a wreck on a wreck by the time Chip is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Peeps > circus peanuts by a mile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSE Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 The Eagles are idiots followed by the Browns If I lived in either town, I move Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Haha. Had chocolate covered Peeps for the first time this weekend. Absolutely amazing. The Bills aren't trading their starting qb. Imo Correct, Cassel's here for the year at least. I'm sure that they'd jump at an opportunity to trade their backup if the price is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Chip will either be the greatest football mind that there has ever been or a blistering idiot. Even if he is somehow making the 'right' personnel moves...he's pissing off a lot of players. He's going to have to be genius every single year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snamsnoops Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 So it's stupid to write off young QB's and you'd write off a young QB? Interesting. Just the crappy ones! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Football-wise, I think Philly and Chip might be the best fit possible. Chip is doing it his way and he's fearless, if there's anyone going to get the best out of Johnny, I put him high on the list. It depends what pick they get. If they convince the Browns to give #12 and Johnny for Bradford, my hat's off to Chip, that puts the Eagles in position to grab Mariota and removes one of the primary threats to trade up. If they just move around 2nds to turn Foles into Johnny, that's a big fail. I'm curious about two potential factors, the first being I can't imagine Demarco would be too thrilled. The second is the conditional pick the Rams owe the Eagles. If Bradford plays less than 50% of the snaps, the Eagles get a 3rd. If he's not on the roster, how can he play 50% of the snaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Football-wise, I think Philly and Chip might be the best fit possible. Chip is doing it his way and he's fearless, if there's anyone going to get the best out of Johnny, I put him high on the list. It depends what pick they get. If they convince the Browns to give #12 and Johnny for Bradford, my hat's off to Chip, that puts the Eagles in position to grab Mariota and removes one of the primary threats to trade up. If they just move around 2nds to turn Foles into Johnny, that's a big fail. I'm curious about two potential factors, the first being I can't imagine Demarco would be too thrilled. The second is the conditional pick the Rams owe the Eagles. If Bradford plays less than 50% of the snaps, the Eagles get a 3rd. If he's not on the roster, how can he play 50% of the snaps? Cleveland is shopping shopping Johnny, Eagles didn't call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 The Browns have gotta be "that guy" in your fantasy league who offers Rivers & Gates for Luck & Gronk and tells people he almost traded for Luck. Haha; this is classic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts