Jump to content

Minority coaching interview


Recommended Posts

I'd interview Jackson, and I'd consider him a real candidate. No need to go through a charade with Pepper when there's a bona fide candidate who satisfies the rule.

A guy like Jackson would be a total slap in the face to Schwartz. He would hate it to no end. I'm sure Pegula will make it worth his while to stay, but we are in somewhat of a bind with regards to Schwartz. You really can't hire a guy like Jackson. You have to hire a first time hotshot offensive guy candidate or big time college guy or huge name like Cowher. Otherwise, you might as well hire Schwartz.

Edited by Kelly the Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A guy like Jackson would be a total slap in the face to Schwartz. He would hate it to no end. I'm sure Pegula will make it worth his while to stay, but we are in somewhat of a bind with regards to Schwartz. You really can't hire a guy like Jackson. You have to hire a first time hotshot offensive guy candidate or big time college guy or huge name like Cowher. Otherwise, you might as well hire Schwartz.

 

why do you think this Kelly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

why do you think this Kelly?

Because Schwartz, rightfully, believes he should be a strong candidate for the job. He did a great job last year. He's been a head coach before. Most guys like him get one more chance down the road. This year is probably not the year he gets the looks because he's only one year removed from Detroit. But he's a viable candidate. You can convince him to stay and to go along with the idea that you head a strong defense, we are going to sign a hotshot offensive guy like Gase or Bevell who will come in and run the offense and you run the defense. Or a manager type like Reich who would hire an OC. You can sell a big college name as a coup, or a guy like Cowher. You can't sell him on a retread like Jackson who is just like him. He would consider that a slap in his face. I understand Jackson didn't get three years or so, but he still had control over s team and he was not asked back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Because Schwartz, rightfully, believes he should be a strong candidate for the job. He did a great job last year. He's been a head coach before. Most guys like him get one more chance down the road. This year is probably not the year he gets the looks because he's only one year removed from Detroit. But he's a viable candidate. You can convince him to stay and to go along with the idea that you head a strong defense, we are going to sign a hotshot offensive guy like Gase or Bevell who will come in and run the offense and you run the defense. Or a manager type like Reich who would hire an OC. You can sell a big college name as a coup, or a guy like Cowher. You can't sell him on a retread like Jackson who is just like him. He would consider that a slap in his face. I understand Jackson didn't get three years or so, but he still had control over s team and he was not asked back.

 

in essence, its hard even for you or i to be passed up for a promotion we feel we are more qualified for than our future boss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, I could be doing the same with Jackson that others around the league are doing to Marrone...in essence "if he could win in Oakland" think what he could do here?

 

I just don't see him as a retread.

 

And BTW, i also have no objection to Shwartz getting the job..would prefer him over Reich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't sell him on a retread like Jackson who is just like him. He would consider that a slap in his face. I understand Jackson didn't get three years or so, but he still had control over s team and he was not asked back.

 

I could see that argument with a defensive candidate like Bowles, but Jackson's an offensive guy. Frankly, I imagine Schwartz would be less offended by him than by a relative neophyte like Reich or Gase (though I imagine Schwartz will in actuality resent them hiring anyone other than Cowher or Jim Schwartz).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, I could be doing the same with Jackson that others around the league are doing to Marrone...in essence "if he could win in Oakland" think what he could do here?

 

I just don't see him as a retread.

 

And BTW, i also have no objection to Shwartz getting the job..would prefer him over Reich

It really has nothing to do with how good he is though. I thought he did a pretty good job. I wouldn't even mind him as OC if Reich were to get the job. Retread has a bad connotation obviously. I was simply talking about from Schwartz's point of view, he had one chance and looking for a second, and Jackson had one chance and looking for a second. And with that unknown and Schwartz already here, he should get that job not Jackson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It was Carrolls third stint. Fourth if you count the professional team at USC.

 

As far as the minority coaches go, the Bills should interview Henderson or Pepper Johnson after a phone call to Schwartz, although that's probably unnecessary. Schwartz would understand. The Rooney Rule is a farce for the most part, but it does allow these guys to go through the process and get their ducks in a row and give them some good experience for later when they may be taken more seriously. We should afford our guys that experience rather than some outsider who has no chance. If they look at Bowles it's somewhat of a slap to Schwartz.

My bad, I thought the Jets was his first NFL gig
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Schwartz, rightfully, believes he should be a strong candidate for the job. He did a great job last year. He's been a head coach before. Most guys like him get one more chance down the road. This year is probably not the year he gets the looks because he's only one year removed from Detroit. But he's a viable candidate. You can convince him to stay and to go along with the idea that you head a strong defense, we are going to sign a hotshot offensive guy like Gase or Bevell who will come in and run the offense and you run the defense. Or a manager type like Reich who would hire an OC. You can sell a big college name as a coup, or a guy like Cowher. You can't sell him on a retread like Jackson who is just like him. He would consider that a slap in his face. I understand Jackson didn't get three years or so, but he still had control over s team and he was not asked back.

And, I could be doing the same with Jackson that others around the league are doing to Marrone...in essence "if he could win in Oakland" think what he could do here?

 

I just don't see him as a retread.

 

And BTW, i also have no objection to Shwartz getting the job..would prefer him over Reich

 

 

 

I think Schwartz will be upset no matter what happens. In my opinion, if the Bills had another good Defensive year and Schwartz kept a low profile, he will be gone after 2015 anyway. I think he'd really be pissed if the Bills make a charade out of the Rooney Rule to interview one of Schwartz' assistants. Hue Jackson got a raw deal in Oakland from what I remember and I don't see him as a re-tread either. He didn't get shown the door because he was unsuccessful. And all that being said, I also wouldn't think shifting Schwartz over to HC is a bad idea, depending on who the Bills bring in as OC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I could see that argument with a defensive candidate like Bowles, but Jackson's an offensive guy. Frankly, I imagine Schwartz would be less offended by him than by a relative neophyte like Reich or Gase (though I imagine Schwartz will in actuality resent them hiring anyone other than Cowher or Jim Schwartz).

He understands the hotshot sexy choices. Teams pick them way more than second chance guys like him. He's smart and he's been around this for 20 years. He would understand the Bills picking Gase. He looks at Jackson as a guy like him.

 

My bad, I thought the Jets was his first NFL gig

I think he only had three years total between the Pats and Jets but it could have been four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somewhere I read that Hue Jackson comes on like Pete Carroll when you first meet him with all sorts of confidence and positive energy. But, according to the article, the pretense wears thin after a while and you see Jackson for what he really is: a fraud & pretender.

 

I'm smart enough not to believe everything I read yet this negative description of Jackson sticks with me even though I've read more positive takes since.

 

Hue did go 8-8 with a weak Raiders squad in 2011. They haven't won more than 4 games in a season since he left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

I think Schwartz will be upset no matter what happens. In my opinion, if the Bills had another good Defensive year and Schwartz kept a low profile, he will be gone after 2015 anyway. I think he'd really be pissed if the Bills make a charade out of the Rooney Rule to interview one of Schwartz' assistants. Hue Jackson got a raw deal in Oakland from what I remember and I don't see him as a re-tread either. He didn't get shown the door because he was unsuccessful. And all that being said, I also wouldn't think shifting Schwartz over to HC is a bad idea, depending on who the Bills bring in as OC.

He would understand the idea of his assistants getting an interview was to help them, not to leapfrog him. They would appreciate it. He would be totally on board with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably bad place to put this...but i really like Hue Jackson. I think his players responded well to him in Oakland, Cinci offense seems to be playing well, he is young and aggressive...and i think being a previous head coach maybe Schwartz would be okay with staying

 

I believe the rule has worked as intended BTW, and i still like the rule.

Didn't we interview him when he left Oakland?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what qualifies as a "minority interview" ?? does the rooney rule apply only to african-americans? what about native americans? and of course gay americans..did the NFL ever explain or expand on the rule or define "minority?.. what about women?

Edited by dwight in philly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...