JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 4-2 against AFC East 4-0 against NFC North 1-5 against rest of AFC and we miss playoffs on tiebreakers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 (edited) Well actually that means we did beat our division.... Got to work on the conference now... Edited December 30, 2014 by Captain Hindsight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted December 30, 2014 Author Share Posted December 30, 2014 Well actually that means we did beat our division.... Got to work on the conference now... That's my point - it was a flawed philosophy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 That's my point - it was a flawed philosophy No its not. You play the same 6 games every single season. You have to beat those teams to have a shot every year The team needs to execute and hold onto the ball vs KC, Houston and the Broncos and that 1-5 record is 3-2 But they didn't. I have zero problems with the way this team is built... except at QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 That's my point - it was a flawed philosophy I didn't know you target who to beat. I thought you try to win every game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r00tabaga Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 It is the philosophy of every team in the NFL. Makes a 100% sense to me. 6 games a year, win your division and you host a playoff game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 We were capable of beating the Chiefs, Texans and Chargers. I have no doubt about that. Playing them next week, I think I give better then 50% that we would beat any one of those three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike in Horseheads Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 We were capable of beating the Chiefs, Texans and Chargers. I have no doubt about that. Playing them next week, I think I give better then 50% that we would beat any one of those three. I guess you mean with Tuel as QB? The other two lost those games. Just kidding, these topics are full of BS today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 That's my point - it was a flawed philosophy Its working out OK for Carolina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick the Greek Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 4-2 against AFC East 4-0 against NFC North 1-5 against rest of AFC and we miss playoffs on tiebreakers. don't get me wrong, I'm delighted we beat the Pats, unlike some other sour pusses on the board. However, sayin we are 4-2 against the AFC East is a bit misleading. 3-3 may seem more appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 I guess you mean with Tuel as QB? The other two lost those games. Just kidding, these topics are full of BS today it wasn't just manuel that lost hte houston and san diego games.the d crapped the bed a few times early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VermontFan Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 don't get me wrong, I'm delighted we beat the Pats, unlike some other sour pusses on the board. However, sayin we are 4-2 against the AFC East is a bit misleading. 3-3 may seem more appropriate. No, the Bills were 4-2 against the AFC East. It doesn't matter what you think would have happened if Gronk had played. He didn't, the Bills won. 4-2. Crazy how that works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 No, the Bills were 4-2 against the AFC East. It doesn't matter what you think would have happened if Gronk had played. He didn't, the Bills won. 4-2. Crazy how that works. No one would care that Dareus and Gilmore were out if the Pats won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metzelaars_lives Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 You can go out tonight and rip juicy farts at a bar and maybe you meet a chick who is into it and she goes home with you. That doesn't necessarily mean that ripping juicy farts is a good way to pick up girls at bars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 4-2 against AFC East 4-0 against NFC North 1-5 against rest of AFC and we miss playoffs on tiebreakers. I hope every player spends the entire off season stewing over it, too. Win your division. Don't lose at home. No worse than .500 on the road. That used to be our formula back in the day. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 Its not flawed.... In order to be a successful team you need to be able to win in your own division.......we did that baby steps my brother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 4-2 against AFC East 4-0 against NFC North 1-5 against rest of AFC and we miss playoffs on tiebreakers. If the Bills had went 6-0 in the division they would be in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 4-2 against AFC East4-0 against NFC North 1-5 against rest of AFC and we miss playoffs on tiebreakers. This just proves that Crayonz was right all along. You need to lose the games vs. the NFC. It's the best way into the playoffs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts