Global warming err Climate change HOAX

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, KD in CA said:

 

But..but....what if it's "settled science"?

 

What, no one ever told you that the luminiferous aether really does exist?  No such thing as continental drift, either...earthquakes and mountains occur because the earth shrinks as it cools.

[Azalin]

15 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

What, no one ever told you that the luminiferous aether really does exist?  No such thing as continental drift, either...earthquakes and mountains occur because the earth shrinks as it cools.

 

So, there really is no gravity and the Earth truly just sucks?

 

Next you'll tell me that the wind blows, too.

[DC Tom]

58 minutes ago, Azalin said:

 

So, there really is no gravity and the Earth truly just sucks?

 

Next you'll tell me that the wind blows, too.

 

No, there's gravity.  There's just no nuclear weapons, because Newtonian Physics is settled science.

[Azalin]

13 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

No, there's gravity.  There's just no nuclear weapons, because Newtonian Physics is settled science.

 

What?! Next you're going to tell me that Schrodinger never owned a cat....

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, Azalin said:

 

What?! Next you're going to tell me that Schrodinger never owned a cat....

 

Of course he did.  He kept it at Werner Heisenberg's...we think.  We're not sure, because the cat was very fast.

[TH3]

23 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Permanent harm?  Pretty low.  Guillian-Barre from a flu shot is about a 1 in 500,000 chance.  For MMR, serious and long-term reactions are virtually unheard of (so rare, it's statistically impossible to link them to the vaccine.)  Yellow Fever vaccine, about 2 per million will suffer organ failure and die...which is still a hell of a lot better than getting Yellow Fever (by a factor of about 100,000).

Temporary discomfort?  Hell, anytime I get a flu or tetanus shot (every five years...having a wood shop, it seems prudent) I get sick for a couple days - low fever, discomfort, achy.  Because that's what a vaccine is supposed to do: trigger an immunological reaction.  That's what a fever is.  It's not a reason to not get a shot - it tells you the shot is working, and your immune system is responding properly to it.  

 

Americans expect to live in not just a low-risk, but a zero-risk society.  Frickin' snowflakes. I also realize how ironic the preceding science I just quoted is...after all, I have spent page after page trying to discredit the science behind global warming...and here I am using it....I must be an idiot!

.

[row_33]

Waiting longer to have children increases the risk of problems, dust bunnies in men and women in their 30s and 40s are factors

 

 

[Azalin]

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Of course he did.  He kept it at Werner Heisenberg's...we think.  We're not sure, because the cat was very fast.

 

    If I'd been both alive and dead at the same time, I'd be moving pretty fast once that box was opened too.

[/dev/null]

3 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

No, there's gravity.  There's just no nuclear weapons, because Newtonian Physics is settled science.

But Newtonian Physics is a Western European construct and is thus open to interpretation

 

 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, baskin said:

.

 

You are useless.  You haven't understood a word anyone's said, have you?

[B-Man]

If you've seen the viral starving polar bear photo, read this thread on why linking it to global warming is BS

 

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2017/12/10/if-youve-seen-the-viral-starving-polar-bear-photo-read-this-thread-on-why-linking-it-to-global-warming-is-bs/?utm_campaign=twitchywidget

[B-Man]

MORE GLOBAL WARMING FRAUD: THIS TIME, IT’S SEA LEVEL

 

In a new paper published in Earth Systems and Environment this month, Australian scientists Dr. Albert Parker and Dr. Clifford Ollier uncover evidence that Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) overseers appear to have been engaging in the “highly questionable” and “suspicious” practice of adjusting historical tide gauge data to show recent accelerated sea level rise where no such acceleration (or rise) exists.

 

Extensive evidence from “tide gauges, coastal morphology, stratigraphy, radiocarbon dating, archaeological remains, and historical documentation” all suggest that sea levels in the Indian Ocean have effectively been stable in recent decades.

The data-adjusters take misaligned and incomplete sea level data from tide gauges that show no sea level rise (or even a falling trend). Then, they subjectively and arbitrarily cobble them together, or realign them. In each case assessed, PSMSL data-adjusters lower the earlier misaligned rates and raise the more recent measurements. By doing so, they concoct a new linearly-rising trend.

 

 

,

[DC Tom]

54 minutes ago, B-Man said:

MORE GLOBAL WARMING FRAUD: THIS TIME, IT’S SEA LEVEL

 

In a new paper published in Earth Systems and Environment this month, Australian scientists Dr. Albert Parker and Dr. Clifford Ollier uncover evidence that Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) overseers appear to have been engaging in the “highly questionable” and “suspicious” practice of adjusting historical tide gauge data to show recent accelerated sea level rise where no such acceleration (or rise) exists.

 

Extensive evidence from “tide gauges, coastal morphology, stratigraphy, radiocarbon dating, archaeological remains, and historical documentation” all suggest that sea levels in the Indian Ocean have effectively been stable in recent decades.

The data-adjusters take misaligned and incomplete sea level data from tide gauges that show no sea level rise (or even a falling trend). Then, they subjectively and arbitrarily cobble them together, or realign them. In each case assessed, PSMSL data-adjusters lower the earlier misaligned rates and raise the more recent measurements. By doing so, they concoct a new linearly-rising trend.

 

 

,

 

That's not fraud, that's an excellent example of what I keep saying is one of the biggest problems with global warming "science."  You can prove damn near anything with the data as long as you choose the right baseline.

[westerndecline]

On 12/8/2017 at 8:29 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Permanent harm?  Pretty low.  Guillian-Barre from a flu shot is about a 1 in 500,000 chance.  For MMR, serious and long-term reactions are virtually unheard of (so rare, it's statistically impossible to link them to the vaccine.)  Yellow Fever vaccine, about 2 per million will suffer organ failure and die...which is still a hell of a lot better than getting Yellow Fever (by a factor of about 100,000).

Temporary discomfort?  Hell, anytime I get a flu or tetanus shot (every five years...having a wood shop, it seems prudent) I get sick for a couple days - low fever, discomfort, achy.  Because that's what a vaccine is supposed to do: trigger an immunological reaction.  That's what a fever is.  It's not a reason to not get a shot - it tells you the shot is working, and your immune system is responding properly to it.  

 

Americans expect to live in not just a low-risk, but a zero-risk society.  Frickin' snowflakes.

 

 

Does this fight gw libtards???

Edited December 13, 2017 by westerndecline

[B-Man]

This is what the EPA headquarters in D.C. looked like on Friday. 

 

 

 

Quote

 

Robert Maguire
✔@RobertMaguire_

A water fountain at the EPA backed up and started spewing sewage into the hallway https://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2017/12/14/stories/1060069063 …

12:02 PM - Dec 15, 2017

 

 

 

But it gets better: The literal s*it storm occurred at the William Jefferson Clinton building

 

IRONY IS DEAD............

 

 

.

[3rdnlng]

6 minutes ago, B-Man said:

This is what the EPA headquarters in D.C. looked like on Friday. 

 

 

 

 

 

But it gets better: The literal s*it storm occurred at the William Jefferson Clinton building

 

IRONY IS DEAD............

 

 

.

They need to practice handling spills like this one:

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/08/09/navajo-nation-epa-spill/31384515/

 

 

Edited December 16, 2017 by 3rdnlng

[3rdnlng]

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/12/15/breaking-trump-to-remove-climate-change-as-a-national-security-threat/

 

The Trump administration will reverse course from previous Obama administration policy, eliminating climate change from a list of national security threats. The National Security Strategy to be released on Monday will emphasize the importance of balancing energy security with economic development and environmental protection, according to a source who has seen the document and shared excerpts of a late draft.

“Climate policies will continue to shape the global energy system,” a draft of the National Security Strategy slated to be released on Monday said. “U.S. leadership is indispensable to countering an anti-growth, energy agenda that is detrimental to U.S. economic and energy security interests. Given future global energy demand, much of the developing world will require fossil fuels, as well as other forms of energy, to power their economies and lift their people out of poverty.”

…

President Obama made climate change, and the burdensome regulations that accompany its focus, a primary focus of his administration, including in his National Security Strategy released in 2015. “[W]e are working toward an ambitious new global climate change agreement to shape standards for prevention, preparedness, and response over the next decade,” that report said.

“In some ways, [climate change] is akin to the problem of terrorism and ISIL,” Obama said at climate talks in Paris in 2015. During a weekly address, Obama said “Today, there is no greater threat to our planet than climate change.”

In September 2016, President Obama released a memorandum requiring federal agencies to consider the effects of climate change in the development of national security-related doctrine, policies, and plans. All of this alarmed critics concerned with more pressing security risks.

[B-Man]

SCOTT PRUITT, THE MAN THEY LOVE TO HATE:

Listing his principles, he started with one he often mentions. “We must reject as a nation the false paradigm that if you are pro-energy, you are anti-environment, and if you are pro-environment, you are anti-energy. I utterly reject that narrative. .  .  . It is not an either-or proposition.”

 

The New York Times is Pruitt’s most vigorous media critic. In August, it featured a front-page story under the headline “Scott Pruitt Is Carrying Out His E.P.A. Agenda in Secret.” The story, among other things, noted he’s “the first head of the agency to ever request round-the-clock security.”

 

Smart move by Pruitt. Given the way he’s been demonized, he needs the security. In September, the Washington Postreported that his guards—“triple the manpower” of his predecessors—are pulling agents away from “pursuing environmental crimes.” The story didn’t mention the EPA has 15,000 employees.

Read the whole thing.

 

 

Earlier: Think “Progress” melts down because “More than 700 employees have left the EPA since Scott Pruitt took over.”

 

The rest of us think “faster, please.”

46

[B-Man]

WELL, GOOD: Georgia regulators say nuclear reactors, nation’s first since 1978, will be finished.

 

 

It’s nice to see a progressive state like Georgia taking the lead on reducing greenhouse gasses.

 

 

.

[Albwan]

Ya because in millions of years before humans the world never went batS%$# crazy

with changes....

lol at people...humans as they are built are short timers on this planet.

they will find their skeletons holding their cell phones for dear life in the far off

future.