B-Man Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 But..........................she's a democrat........................so, you know. D.C. Attorney General Ignores Court Order, Refuses Gun PermitsMay 25, 2016 By Devin Watkins Less than a year ago, Kim Davis ignored a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky and refused to issue a marriage license to same-sex couples. She was held in contempt of court, served five days in jail, and was ruthlessly attacked in the media. Now the office of Karl Racine, the Washington, D.C. attorney general, has ordered D.C. government employees to ignore a court order from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The order by the D.C. District Court Judge Richard Leon was to stop denying individuals applying for a concealed-carry permit from requiring a “good reason,” and to immediately update the forms to no longer require that. The rule of law is worth more than this by an officer of the court such as the attorney general. The D.C. attorney general is free to seek a stay of the court order from the D.C. Circuit Court, but until that opinion is properly stayed it must be obeyed. It is the AG’s duty to see that the court order is properly followed even if he thinks it is wrong. It will take time for D.C. to update the forms as required, but the AG’s office cannot legally order them to ignore the court order and not at least start to draft new forms to inform people that they are not required to submit a “good cause” to exercise a constitutional right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Citing Family, Hillary Clinton Affirms Gun-Control Stance New York Times - 2 days ago Perhaps the next time Hillary talks about guns, she can invite the family of Kate Steinle to the stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Perhaps the next time Hillary talks about guns, she can invite the family of Kate Steinle to the stage. Or Jim Brady! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Audio Shows Katie Couric Documentary Deceptively Edited Interview with Pro-Gun Activists http://freebeacon.com/issues/audio-shows-katie-couric-gun-documentary-deceptively-edited-interview-pro-gun-activists/ The makers of a new Katie Couric documentary on gun violence deceptively edited an interview between Couric and a group of gun rights activists in an apparent attempt to embarrass the activists, an audio recording of the full interview shows. At the 21:48 mark of Under the Gun a scene of Katie Couric interviewing members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a gun rights organization, is shown. Couric can be heard in the interview asking activists from the group, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?” The documentary then shows the activists sitting silently for nine awkward seconds, unable to provide an answer. It then cuts to the next scene. The moment can be watched here: At the link However, raw audio of the interview between Katie Couric and the activists provided to the Washington Free Beacon shows the scene was deceptively edited. Instead of silence, Couric’s question is met immediately with answers from the activists. A back and forth between a number of the league’s members and Couric over the issue of background checks proceeds for more than four minutes after the original question is asked. Listen to the raw audio; it’s yet another reminder that anyone being interviewed should always demand to record separate audio and/or video. If if the producer or journalist refuses, you can pretty much be assured of what’s to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Here's the immediate response to the dishonest Katie Couric. There is NO 9 second silence whatsoever. She dishonestly completely truncates the group's response to her pointed question. This is despicable "journalism". She should be fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted May 27, 2016 Share Posted May 27, 2016 Here's the immediate response to the dishonest Katie Couric. There is NO 9 second silence whatsoever. She dishonestly completely truncates the group's response to her pointed question. This is despicable "journalism". She should be fired. More than that she should be exposed as an example of the fraudulent media. How simple it is to totally misrepresent. I don't know how she sleeps at night knowing how dishonest she is at her job. I suppose she does though. All left wing extremists believe in any means to a end for their cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 4, 2016 Share Posted June 4, 2016 (edited) Hear the good news! Katie Couric's director had one of her employees commit four felonies. No sweetheart, it's not legal. It's totally illegal, and I hope you and your employee go to federal pound-me-up-the-azz prison for this ****. Edited June 4, 2016 by Nanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 No surprise here....................... Justice Dept. List of Withheld Fast & Furious Docs is 1,323 Pages Long. TRANSPARENCY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostbitmic Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Hear the good news! Katie Couric's director had one of her employees commit four felonies. No sweetheart, it's not legal. It's totally illegal, and I hope you and your employee go to federal pound-me-up-the-azz prison for this ****. You seem .... Angry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Not at all. Just waiting for the Obama Justice Department to charge the two people involved with the felonies. Let's see how long that will take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 In a new statement, Katie Couric's director confirmed today that her team deliberately skirted federal gun laws. http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/06/katie-courics-producer-confirms-her-team-skirted-federal-gun-laws/ They didn't "skirt" them........................ They broke them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Waiting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 And the ATF will kick in their door in 5..4...3...2..........wait nothing is going to happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 The correct thread........................... Folks, they are simply, absolutely, totally out of their ever-loving minds. This is the dumbest possible thing. A gun cannot commit a crime. This is a fact of science and law. A person commits a crime. In this case, we even know the name of the person. And we even know what he himself declared as his reason for committing the crime. The gun did not make any claims. The gun did not swear allegiance to anyone. The gun does not have a birth certificate. It does not have parents from Afghanistan. I mean, they don't suggest it, I'm not rephrasing it. They literally say the gun did it. THINK PROGRESS...................yeah right. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 The correct thread........................... Folks, they are simply, absolutely, totally out of their ever-loving minds. This is the dumbest possible thing. A gun cannot commit a crime. This is a fact of science and law. A person commits a crime. In this case, we even know the name of the person. And we even know what he himself declared as his reason for committing the crime. The gun did not make any claims. The gun did not swear allegiance to anyone. The gun does not have a birth certificate. It does not have parents from Afghanistan. I mean, they don't suggest it, I'm not rephrasing it. They literally say the gun did it. THINK PROGRESS...................yeah right. . "Think Progress." Two words, two lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 "Think Progress." Two words, two lies. I also want to see the door that let the terrorist into the bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Hillary After ‘Act of Hate’: ‘Weapons of War Have No Place on Our Streets.’ What is her stance on pressure cookers ? FROM GAY GUN-RIGHTS GROUP THE PINK PISTOLS, a comment on the Orlando shooting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Hillary After Act of Hate: Weapons of War Have No Place on Our Streets. What is her stance on pressure cookers ? FROM GAY GUN-RIGHTS GROUP THE PINK PISTOLS, a comment on the Orlando shooting. Pink pistols 1. Hillary and liberal media 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Hillary After ‘Act of Hate’: ‘Weapons of War Have No Place on Our Streets.’ What is her stance on pressure cookers ? FROM GAY GUN-RIGHTS GROUP THE PINK PISTOLS, a comment on the Orlando shooting. From you good link on the Pink Pistols: “This is exactly the kind of heinous act that justifies our existence. At such a time of tragedy, let us not reach for the low-hanging fruit of blaming the killer’s guns. Let us stay focused on the fact that someone hated gay people so much they were ready to kill or injure so many. A human being did this. The human being’s tools are unimportant when compared to the bleakness of that person’s soul. I say again, GUNS did not do this. A human being did this, a dead human being. Our job now is not to demonize the man’s tools, but to condemn his acts and work to prevent such acts in the future.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 If some of the customers had guns, there would probably be around 10 people dead, with more than half of them being shot by friendly fire... but the left would lose their $#@!. even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts