What is better, no guns, or more guns?

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

[Niagara Bill]

So, if possession of a fire arm, for individual and property protection is allowed under the constitution as has been ruled then consider.

A week ago a BY Rzbferx Dan vest the crap out of a TB fan infront of a huge crowd. Why can't a person take a gun into the game. Would that not stop senseless violence. 

How can restriction of the gun rights be over ruled in a public space?

[Tiberius]

So won't the supreme court simply strike down this new set of laws? 

[B-Man]

 

HYPOCRISY: 

From D.C. to Olympia, Politicians – Guarded by Guns – Presume to Tell You How You’re Allowed to Defend Yourself and Your Family.

 

 

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/from-d-c-to-olympia-politicians-guarded-by-guns-presume-to-tell-you-how-youre-allowed-to-defend-yourself-and-your-family/

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Tiberius]

On 6/24/2022 at 4:55 PM, B-Man said:

 

HYPOCRISY: 

From D.C. to Olympia, Politicians – Guarded by Guns – Presume to Tell You How You’re Allowed to Defend Yourself and Your Family.

 

 

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/from-d-c-to-olympia-politicians-guarded-by-guns-presume-to-tell-you-how-youre-allowed-to-defend-yourself-and-your-family/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or Trump not allowing guns at NRA convention 

 

 

[BillStime]

Um what?

 

 

The cult does NOT care about kids

 

 

Idiots

 

[BillStime]

 

[Warcodered]

On 6/24/2022 at 8:08 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

It's good to know he took that incident so seriously in his decision as to not even know what weapon was actually used in it.

[LeviF]

4 hours ago, Warcodered said:

It's good to know he took that incident so seriously in his decision as to not even know what weapon was actually used in it.

It doesn’t matter. It was illegal for him to carry it. 

[Warcodered]

4 minutes ago, LeviF said:

It doesn’t matter. It was illegal for him to carry it. 

So, he didn't know which law he was talking about then?

[LeviF]

1 hour ago, Warcodered said:

So, he didn't know which law he was talking about then?

What are you on about? The case was about New York’s onerous and subjective requirements for carrying a weapon in public. The dissent he’s referencing suggests that these requirements help stop mass shootings. 

[Tiberius]

 

[T master]

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

What a DA of course it's the guns fault it was just sitting there & told the person that pulled the trigger hey let's go shoot someone today it's definitely not a people problem in any way shape or form !! 

 

Lets just shut down all the gun manufacturers go into every house in the US search & take every gun away from every citizen and the US will never have another ounce of gun violence ever any where I'm all in !! 

[Tiberius]

11 minutes ago, T master said:

 

What a DA of course it's the guns fault it was just sitting there & told the person that pulled the trigger hey let's go shoot someone today it's definitely not a people problem in any way shape or form !! 

 

Lets just shut down all the gun manufacturers go into every house in the US search & take every gun away from every citizen and the US will never have another ounce of gun violence ever any where I'm all in !! 

It’s just another way the lawless rights wants to sow chaos. Flood the nation with murder weapons and create death and mayhem, so that the pathologically unstable “strongman” can say he will fix everything 

[T master]

23 hours ago, Tiberius said:

It’s just another way the lawless rights wants to sow chaos. Flood the nation with murder weapons and create death and mayhem, so that the pathologically unstable “strongman” can say he will fix everything 

 

 

There are less guns per household now than in the 80's but more gun violence so that tells me there is more instability some where so it's either lack of parenting meaning no consequences for their actions or something such as some kind of mental instability in young people .

 

There is only 1 way a gun gets shot & that's if a person pulls the trigger & that person has to have intent to do bodily harm to anther human being so lets look at that problem but it's easier as i have said to just blame the guns even though there are less now than years ago ...

Edited June 28, 2022 by T master

[Tiberius]

9 minutes ago, T master said:

 

 

There are less guns per household now than in the 80's but more gun violence so that tells me there is more instability some where so it's either lack of parenting meaning no consequences for their actions or something such as me kind of mental instability in young people .

 

There is only 1 way a gun gets shot & that's if a person pulls the trigger & that person has to have intent to do bodily harm to anther human being so lets look at that problem but it's easier as i have said to just blame the guns even though there are less now than years ago ...

When you have anti-democratic rule things get worse. 2/3 of our nation is ruled by a very hostile minority, so ya, things will get worse. Why, it’s almost like it’s a plan or something 

[B-Man]

 

 

Another gun case waits in the wings.

 

Allen Whitaker is a resident of Washington, D.C., who holds a handgun license. In April 2019, police stopped Whitaker, who is Black and wears dreadlocks, and his male cousin at gunpoint when they were returning from a gun range with Whitaker’s daughter and girlfriend and stopped at a gas station at which a few of the other patrons got into an altercation. Noticing that Whitaker wore an empty pistol holster on his waist, the officers handcuffed the two men. They searched the vehicle as well as Whitaker and his family, found an amount of marijuana legally permissible in the District belonging to Whitaker’s girlfriend, and seized both the marijuana and Whitaker’s gun that was stored in a lockbox in the trunk. The police eventually released Whitaker and his family without charge, but they refused to return the handgun.

 

After applying to register a new firearm, Whitaker received notice from the Metropolitan Police Department that his gun license would be revoked. D.C. law allows the MPD to determine whether a person is a “suitable” applicant to own a handgun. The notice explained that the gas-station incident, combined with Whitaker’s misdemeanor criminal history that had been evaluated in his originally approved application for a gun license, demonstrated a “propensity for violence or instability” unsuitable for a firearm owner. The Concealed Pistol Licensing Review Board denied Whitaker’s administrative appeal. Whitaker filed suit in the D.C. Court of Appeals, which dismissed the case as moot after the MPD voluntarily reinstated Whitaker’s license mid-litigation. In Whitaker v. District of Columbia Concealed Pistol Licensing Review Board, Whitaker asks the justices to review two aspects of the appeals court’s dismissal.

 

On the merits, Whitaker argues that the D.C. regulation is unconstitutionally vague. The “propensity for violence or instability” standard, Whitaker says, “confers standardless discretion on the MPD to disqualify anyone [for a gun license] based on the agency’s subjective judgment.”

 

 

I agree, and the Court should, too.

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/another-gun-case-waits-in-the-wings/

 

 

[LeviF]

Downtown Atlanta. 
 

Run by the lawless right? Interesting take. Wonder how many illegal guns Atlanta PD has proactively taken off the street in the last two years.