Dragonborn10 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Sorry but when did having a mole removed become public domain? I would have said, "It's none of your god dam business. Next question." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Sorry but when did having a mole removed become public domain? I would have said, "It's none of your god dam business. Next question." Since the Bills published a mad-libs story on their web site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 http://www.buffalobills.com/news/article-1/Bills-release-statement-from-Doug-Marrone/5a1ca793-8b28-4151-92de-266327a364f0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oman128 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I got a Bills alert on my phone just a few minutes ago, that said the Bills were making a statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Statement from Marrone: "During a recent doctor's visit, it was discovered that I had a cancerous mole on my skin, which has since been removed. The only follow up required is to have my moles checked every three months and that basically is the end of the story. The recent extraction procedure will have no effect on my ability to coach the team moving forward." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I really wish I would stop getting texts from the Bills on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Since the Bills published a mad-libs story on their web site. Tim Graham is a BLANK hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Sorry but when did having a mole removed become public domain? I would have said, "It's none of your god dam business. Next question." Since the Bills published a mad-libs story on their web site. /thread :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDD Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Cancerous mole = malignant melanoma. The earlier these are caught the better. Mark Spitz is a survivor. Bob Marley die from one under his nail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Use sunscreen when doing yard work, fellas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmokinES3 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 (edited) Depends on whether "cancerous mole" = melanoma or not. If yes, then it is potentially, now or later, a "biggie." Exactly... That was my first thought. Cancerous mole = malignant melanoma. The earlier these are caught the better. Mark Spitz is a survivor. Bob Marley die from one under his nail. It could be squamous or basal cell as well I would think... Edited April 23, 2014 by SmokinES3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I got a Bills alert on my phone just a few minutes ago, that said the Bills were making a statement. How many was that this week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I really wish I would stop getting texts from the Bills on this. Sue 'em!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackInDaDay Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Statement from Marrone: "During a recent doctor's visit, it was discovered that I had a cancerous mole on my skin, which has since been removed. The only follow up required is to have my moles checked every three months and that basically is the end of the story. The recent extraction procedure will have no effect on my ability to coach the team moving forward." if a mole is suspected of being cancerous by a dermatologist - you can look up the factors - it, and some surrounding tissue, is removed and examined by a pathologist for cancer cells. if cancer cells are found, tests are performed to find which lymph nodes the cancer could have spread to first. these 'sentinel nodes' are removed and examined. treatment then varies - depending on what's found. i went through this process earlier this year, and my 3 month scan is coming up in a month. if Marrone's treatment began and ended with the removal of the mole, it wasn't cancerous. Otherwise, he went through the same process - including surgery - and was also found to be clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I think it's obvious that Marrone's mind is obviously not where it needs to be. He had a 20+ minute Q&A yesterday and he only used the word obviously 12 times, by my count. He is obviously not at the top of his game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 if a mole is suspected of being cancerous by a dermatologist - you can look up the factors - it, and some surrounding tissue, is removed and examined by a pathologist for cancer cells. if cancer cells are found, tests are performed to find which lymph nodes the cancer could have spread to first. these 'sentinel nodes' are removed and examined. treatment then varies - depending on what's found. i went through this process earlier this year, and my 3 month scan is coming up in a month. if Marrone's treatment began and ended with the removal of the mole, it wasn't cancerous. Otherwise, he went through the same process - including surgery - and was also found to be clear. Not true. Basal cell skin cancer and squamous cell skin cancers don't need metastatic workups or lymph node biopsy or other therapy beyond surgical removal (or ablation)--unless they are very large or the patient has clinically positive nodes--very rare. Melanoma is different. Marrone syas his cancerous mole (now gone) requires no further therapy. Not sure why the team decided to make this public at all. Makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Had the headline read "Bills' puppies-dying-in-fires research raises BLANK billion dollars," do we think Tim Graham would have been as Johnny on the Spot? I have my doubts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BackInDaDay Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Not true. Basal cell skin cancer and squamous cell skin cancers don't need metastatic workups or lymph node biopsy or other therapy beyond surgical removal (or ablation)--unless they are very large or the patient has clinically positive nodes--very rare. Melanoma is different. Marrone syas his cancerous mole (now gone) requires no further therapy. Not sure why the team decided to make this public at all. Makes no sense. Thanks for the correction, Mr Weo. I've spent the last couple months staring down worst case melanoma scenarios, and totally disregarded the existence of less threatening forms of skin cancer in my remarks. Coach may want to trade his visor for a cap this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumbalaya Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Look at it this way...what better city for Marrone to coach in than Buffalo. The sun rarely shines so it is the perfect place for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts