Jump to content

Spikes confirmed visiting OBD. Confirmed Signed


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 688
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I hope you are right!

 

What do we all think is a fair contract for Spikes?

 

4 years/$20M?

 

CBF

I hope you are right!

 

What do we all think is a fair contract for Spikes?

 

4 years/$20M?

 

CBF

 

He's young enough and plays a position that would be nice to get a 4 yr deal... Hopefully at least 3 but hopefully under $5 mil a yr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I wonder what the long-term outlook of Biff Co would have been post-Almanac. Even staked to enormous wealth, I can't believe he was much of a businessman and he seemed to have a pretty high burn rate expense-wise, so I could see cash flow problems looming down the road a bit.

 

BiffCo was a multi tiered enterprise, specializing in toxic disposal. But the REAL cash came from the Paradise Casino.

 

Kinda tough for a casino owner to go broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I don't think he missed a regular season game last year. He was benched in the postseason after being late to a team meeting.

 

i think the story devolved into - he totally missed a team meeting while tweeting out pics of his car snowed in, but not calling anyone at the facility to let them know. pats tossed him on IR, and a few days/week later his agent made a comment that he couldve played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one not ecstatic about this? I think that he is a good run stuffing LB but its not like when Takeo came. This guy is limited and can help the run D. I would expect him to improve the run D in a similar manner to the way that Lawson improved the pass d.

 

mixed feelings - hes good at his role but that its so specialized brings some of the same issues you have. its continuing to point at a real basic schwartz 43 scheme. i also liked having players that were super flexible allowing disguise in the scheme..... that said schwartz has had some success, and this would be his most talented unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mixed feelings - hes good at his role but that its so specialized brings some of the same issues you have. its continuing to point at a real basic schwartz 43 scheme. i also liked having players that were super flexible allowing disguise in the scheme..... that said schwartz has had some success, and this would be his most talented unit.

You've got a flexible d-line with ok depth. You'll have flexible OLB's and surprisingly decent depth. You have a safety that can play corner, a guy who covers the slot well and you just brought in a guy that just might challenge for a starting CB spot who is at worst depth.

 

I think the defense will be ok.

 

<edit>did I really say that I think the defense will be ok?</edit>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...