3rdnlng Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 (edited) Au contraire, look at these revised numbers: http://scrappleface....conomic-growth/ Revised Data Show 6 Years of Steep Economic Growth July 30th, 2014 Scott Ott (2014-07-30) — The White House today released revised economic data from the Commerce Department that shows the recession and stagnation of the past six years was actually a time of booming economic growth. “Commerce periodically reviews the numbers and revises its estimates,” said White House spokesman Josh Earnest (which is his real name). “The president was delighted to see that the latest revision marks the start of the turnaround on or about January 20, 2009. His second inauguration spurred another surge. These revisions won’t surprise anyone who really knows the president, or at least none who work for him.” Earnest attributed the new upbeat perspective on economic growth to “President Obama’s skill in crafting executive economic policy, new insights in mathematics from Common Core, and some recent personnel changes at the Department of Commerce’s Office of GDP Review. Edited July 30, 2014 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 I'm not sure that will be good enough because he probably wears an economic recovery awareness bracelet, so his reply will automatically be from a higher moral viewpoint than anything you could offer. Ouch! Damn fleas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Ouch! Damn fleas! still shooting blanks, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Stop dodging, just give one specific example you coward. Just one to show you know (ha ha ha) what you are talking about. Why would I give you one example seeing, you know, they're all different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Au contraire, look at these revised numbers: http://scrappleface....conomic-growth/ Revised Data Show 6 Years of Steep Economic Growth July 30th, 2014 Scott Ott (2014-07-30) — The White House today released revised economic data from the Commerce Department that shows the recession and stagnation of the past six years was actually a time of booming economic growth. “Commerce periodically reviews the numbers and revises its estimates,” said White House spokesman Josh Earnest (which is his real name). “The president was delighted to see that the latest revision marks the start of the turnaround on or about January 20, 2009. His second inauguration spurred another surge. These revisions won’t surprise anyone who really knows the president, or at least none who work for him.” Earnest attributed the new upbeat perspective on economic growth to “President Obama’s skill in crafting executive economic policy, new insights in mathematics from Common Core, and some recent personnel changes at the Department of Commerce’s Office of GDP Review. Does anyone really believe these numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Does anyone really believe these numbers? I think if you went out in public as the "man on the street" and showed this chart to people walking around, yes many (possibly a majority) would say they believe those numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 30, 2014 Share Posted July 30, 2014 Does anyone really believe these numbers? Are you not familiar with "Scrappleface"? It gives "The Onion" a run for its money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 20, 2014 Author Share Posted August 20, 2014 http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/354-percent-109631000-welfare 109 Million People. Would rank as the 12th largest country in the world, between Mexico (119M) and the Phillipenes (100M) Thirty Five Point Foreward! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Does anyone really believe these numbers? Do you believe the Dow hit 17,000? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 (edited) Do you believe the Dow hit 17,000? And what does that number represent with regard to the health of the economy? And how does that number help the poor that you have such sympathy for? Edited August 20, 2014 by Chef Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Earnest attributed the new upbeat perspective on economic growth to “President Obama’s skill in crafting executive economic policy, new insights in mathematics from Common Core, and some recent personnel changes at the Department of Commerce’s Office of GDP Review. Ah yes, my new hell, Common Core. I can now count on pissing away 15 minutes of my life on Common Core, per phone call to my mom. The same is true with every other teacher. Recently I had the opportunity to go out with a bunch of people she works with. Being the troll that I am, I waited until I was just about to leave, and then asked "I've been hearing about this Common Core thing, what's the big problem with it?" Then I began my run. A 50 year old woman, otherwise refined in every way, dipped her napkin in her neighbor's beer and threw it at me! Ah, but I can still dodge, and she missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 20, 2014 Share Posted August 20, 2014 Au contraire, look at these revised numbers: http://scrappleface....conomic-growth/ Revised Data Show 6 Years of Steep Economic Growth July 30th, 2014 Scott Ott (2014-07-30) — The White House today released revised economic data from the Commerce Department that shows the recession and stagnation of the past six years was actually a time of booming economic growth. “Commerce periodically reviews the numbers and revises its estimates,” said White House spokesman Josh Earnest (which is his real name). “The president was delighted to see that the latest revision marks the start of the turnaround on or about January 20, 2009. His second inauguration spurred another surge. These revisions won’t surprise anyone who really knows the president, or at least none who work for him.” Earnest attributed the new upbeat perspective on economic growth to “President Obama’s skill in crafting executive economic policy, new insights in mathematics from Common Core, and some recent personnel changes at the Department of Commerce’s Office of GDP Review. I had to read that three times before I went back and checked to make sure it was scrappleface. Too damn funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 And what does that number represent with regard to the health of the economy? And how does that number help the poor that you have such sympathy for? Doesn't represent anything if its not true. Do you feel its accurate? And why or why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Doesn't represent anything if its not true. Do you feel its accurate? And why or why not? I'd answer your questions if I knew that the hell you were talkng about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Doesn't represent anything if its not true. Do you feel its accurate? And why or why not? What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 What? Basically, gator won't admit he has no idea what that data means, so he is asking you to prove that it's not true. A master stroke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Basically, gator won't admit he has no idea what that data means, so he is asking you to prove that it's not true. A master stroke. Actually he was asking me and he's a master stroker alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Actually he was asking me and he's a master stroker alright. To prove what? That the Dow went over 17000? His questions made no sense. They were barely English. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 To prove what? That the Dow went over 17000? His questions made no sense. They were barely English. I have no clue what he was talking about and I made reference to that in my reply to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 I'd answer your questions if I knew that the hell you were talkng about. You clowns don't follow along too well. He asked if the economic stats were accurate and I asked if the Dow was accurate. You started down a totally different road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts