djp14150 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 As of now the order is: 1. KC 2 122 2. JAX 2 129 3. OAK 4 112 4. PHL 4 122 5. DET 4 137 6. BUF 5 117 7. CLE 5 120 8. TEN 5 123 9. AZ 5 135 10.SD 6 110 11. JETS 6 121 12. TB 6 121.5 13. CAR 6 124 These numbers are taking into account next weeks opponents. The only things that will change order will be the indivivual teams game played and their non common opponents games. The games against their other division foes and the two divisions they played wash out. the other within division will adds 2pts, the division within conference will add 2 pts, interconference division add 2 pts. everyone will increase by: With BUF and CLE since they finished in the same position last year...BUF noncommons are CLE and KC, CLE noncommon are BUF and INDY....thus CLE can not pass BUF in draft order. THE best CLE can do is gain 1 pt on BUF. 6+ (their own game results L=1, W=0) + their noncommon opponent A win (W=1)+ their noncommon opponent B win (win =1) Thus a difference of more than 3 can not be made up if both teams lost... for example if BUF and TEN both lost TEN cannot pass Buffalo because the difference is 6. Similarly if BUlost and OAK won they cant pass OAK....difference too great. For #4 BUF loses, DET and PHL both win. For #5 BUF loses and either DET or PHL lose. IF BUF were to win the lowest possible they can go is #10 ...The Jets cant get ahead of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 I don't usually jump on the "lose for the draft" bandwagon but there is absolutely no excuse for beating the Jets. We had better not win next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Cain Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Damn Arizona & Miami wins costing us dearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awwufelloff Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Wow! Pick 4, Jarvis Jones anyone? (Von Miller clone?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewildrabbit Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Does it really matter? if Buddy Nix is still doing the drafting the Bills could have the first overall pick and still screw it up. A DB or RB no doubt... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM57 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Wow! Pick 4, Jarvis Jones anyone? (Von Miller clone?) Yeah, let's pick a 3-4 rush backer and switch back to the 3-4 again. there's a winning formula. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djp14150 Posted December 24, 2012 Author Share Posted December 24, 2012 An add on for opponents scheduling.....the only placements to be decided are: AFC Jets win, MIA lose..JETS in 2nd. BUF clinched 4th place. NFC: Giants in 2nd or 3rd DAL in 1st/2nd, or 3rd WAS in 1sst or 2nd MIN & CHI in 2nd or 3rd SEA/SF in 1st or 2nd NO 2nd/3rd CAR 2nd/3rd/4th TB 3rd/4th --IF CAR beat NO they end up in 2nd place due to H2H sweep. 2013 opponents: http://www.johnnyroadtrip.com/schedules/nflopponents.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 An add on for opponents scheduling.....the only placements to be decided are: AFC Jets win, MIA lose..JETS in 2nd. BUF clinched 4th place. NFC: Giants in 2nd or 3rd DAL in 1st/2nd, or 3rd WAS in 1sst or 2nd MIN & CHI in 2nd or 3rd SEA/SF in 1st or 2nd NO 2nd/3rd CAR 2nd/3rd/4th TB 3rd/4th --IF CAR beat NO they end up in 2nd place due to H2H sweep. 2013 opponents: http://www.johnnyroa...flopponents.htm So that is confirmed, even if the Bills beat the Jets next week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djp14150 Posted December 24, 2012 Author Share Posted December 24, 2012 So that is confirmed, even if the Bills beat the Jets next week? yes If JETS win and MIA lose.....tied at 7-9...tiebreaker to Jets based on divisional record. Bills cant catch the Jets If BILLS beat the JETS.... tied at 6-10....divisional record tied at 2-4....common games record the Jets would be 6-8, buffalo 4-10...so Jets in 3rd place. Bills in 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRT88 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Draft order is based on strength of schedule, therefore, whomever has the same record but a weaker schedule draftshigher. And we need to trade up to #1 and draft Geno Smith because it all starts with having a QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gray Beard Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Of the teams likely to draft higher than the Bills, how many would want a QB or LB (i.e., Geno Smith or Manti Te'o)? I doubt KC would entertain a trade because they need a QB, so if Geno is the best QB in the draft, he will go to KC and no trade up is possible. etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zow2 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 So now that Nix is completely on board with drafting a QB...it makes sense that he gets canned and the new staff doesn't select a rookie QB. That would be typical Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjmac Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 So now that Nix is completely on board with drafting a QB...it makes sense that he gets canned and the new staff doesn't select a rookie QB. That would be typical Bills. I don't think that will be a problem. I believe that any new staff will can Fitz as soon as they are on board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 With Jax apparently trading for Tebow we have our pick of a guy not named Geno Smith. Barkley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny33 Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Wow! Pick 4, Jarvis Jones anyone? (Von Miller clone?) Jones has a degenerative spinal condition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobobonators Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 Yeah, let's pick a 3-4 rush backer and switch back to the 3-4 again. there's a winning formula. yeah, jones is def best for a 3-4. maybe we'll just switch back and forth between 3-4/4-3 personnel every 2 years and eternally suck at both? best defensive player at #4 for our defense is in my sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattsox Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 I don't usually jump on the "lose for the draft" bandwagon but there is absolutely no excuse for beating the Jets. We had better not win next week. I don't even think they can even if they wanted too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 yes If JETS win and MIA lose.....tied at 7-9...tiebreaker to Jets based on divisional record. Bills cant catch the Jets If BILLS beat the JETS.... tied at 6-10....divisional record tied at 2-4....common games record the Jets would be 6-8, buffalo 4-10...so Jets in 3rd place. Bills in 4th. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGun12TD Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 Wow! Pick 4, Jarvis Jones anyone? (Von Miller clone?) sweet god JJ would be awesome!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Trooth Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Yeah, let's pick a 3-4 rush backer and switch back to the 3-4 again. there's a winning formula. 3-4 is exactly what the bills need. Other than barnett, there is no pure 4-3 olb. Shep & white are both 3-4 ilbs. Moats is clearly a 3-4 OLB. Bradham could play in either. Anderson could also play olb. Carrington & mario are both big enough to be 3-4 des. Realy need a pure & dominant nt. But most of all an owner, hc, and coaches that don't have there heads up their ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts