DC Tom Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 http://www.realclear..._md_suburb.html These Clowns out do each other every single day. Of all the arrant nonsense Matthews spews in that video (seriously, listen to it), people choose to nitpick "lived in DC for 40 years," which is quite possibly the only sensible thing he said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Well you do post about the same time--1:00--4:00 am EST Yeah, but he knows how to capitalize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Just saw this and had to share here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Just saw this and had to share here. They forgot the hot, not hot part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) That's hysterical. Edited August 31, 2012 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldTraveller Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Just saw this and had to share here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juror#8 Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Y'all are funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) Not racist, since it wasn't Obama. spit all over the place,lol Just saw this and had to share here. just a question- the righties always complain about welfare for families with tons of kids they cannot afford. obviously you cannot stop people from having sex so the options are...( nevermind epidemiology and its cost with no available contraceptives) 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... ok, pick one! Edited August 31, 2012 by MARCELL DAREUS POWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 i need some clarification...if we do in fact choose option 1, can we feed the kids to the homeless and the hungry? that will go a long way in how i answer the question... spit all over the place,lol just a question- the righties always complain about welfare for families with tons of kids they cannot afford. obviously you cannot stop people from having sex so the options are...( nevermind epidemiology and its cost with no available contraceptives) 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... ok, pick one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juror#8 Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 spit all over the place,lol just a question- the righties always complain about welfare for families with tons of kids they cannot afford. obviously you cannot stop people from having sex so the options are...( nevermind epidemiology and its cost with no available contraceptives) 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... ok, pick one! 4. Eugenics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) i need some clarification...if we do in fact choose option 1, can we feed the kids to the homeless and the hungry? that will go a long way in how i answer the question... yes! in fact, didnt you know that most homeless people choose to be homeless and mentally ill! in fact, if you offered them a decent job right now, they would turn it down! !@#$ THOSE POOR PEOPLE! Edited August 31, 2012 by MARCELL DAREUS POWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 spit all over the place,lol just a question- the righties always complain about welfare for families with tons of kids they cannot afford. obviously you cannot stop people from having sex so the options are...( nevermind epidemiology and its cost with no available contraceptives) 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... ok, pick one! I'd explain the problem of paying poor people to have even more children they can't afford, but that would require you to understand the concept of incentive, which is not something I'd expect a young, ignorant left winger to grasp. Carry on with your nonsensical rants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 spit all over the place,lol just a question- the righties always complain about welfare for families with tons of kids they cannot afford. obviously you cannot stop people from having sex so the options are...( nevermind epidemiology and its cost with no available contraceptives) 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... ok, pick one! So in your world, when a woman has multiple children she knows she can not care for in any way, shape or form... the only three choices to address the problem are exclusively on the shoulders of everyone EXCEPT the woman. I know in your world, personal accountability is off the table, but in my world those three choices are unacceptable, so let me ask you this: If the answer is "let the child die," does this mean the woman goes to prison for murder? Neglect? Child endangerment? Abuse? Or is she free to go and the child dying is everyone else's fault? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 I've been a pretty good fan of National Journal, but this article pretty much does it for me. http://www.nationalj...20120829?page=1 Why and How Mitt Romney is Playing the Race Card. OH MY GOD! THEY CRACKED THE CODE!!! Looks like the state department is 'expanding' (funny....government just keeps making everything bigger) the code. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/30/state-department-hold-down-fort-other-common-phrases-could-be-offensive/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) So in your world, when a woman has multiple children she knows she can not care for in any way, shape or form... the only three choices to address the problem are exclusively on the shoulders of everyone EXCEPT the woman. I know in your world, personal accountability is off the table, but in my world those three choices are unacceptable, so let me ask you this: If the answer is "let the child die," does this mean the woman goes to prison for murder? Neglect? Child endangerment? Abuse? Or is she free to go and the child dying is everyone else's fault? are you for population control? should we jail poor people for having kids? and at what point? and, who pays to put the woman in jail...?? 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... 4- enforce population control on poor people ( put poor women in jail). combo of 1 and 4 alright, now pick one... this is why the right is sick in some areas and very dogmatic- regardless of how irresponsible it is, its not the childs fault... yet you still dont want the state to help that child... there is the issue of being practical, i highly doubt you will jail a poor woman for having kids. at least i think... im hoping you want the child to live, i hope... if you are pro life- which i am, then you should want the state to provide birth control for poor people. - what is the other option? within reason or even out of control birth rates, there is something disturbing/orwellian about allowing rich people to have kids and not poor people... or even jailing people or sterilizing people for population control... but hey, thats just me... Edited August 31, 2012 by MARCELL DAREUS POWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 are you for population control? should we jail poor people for having kids? and at what point? and, who pays to put the woman in jail...?? 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... 4- enforce population control on poor people ( put poor women in jail). combo of 1 and 4 alright, now pick one... this is why the right is sick in some areas and very dogmatic- regardless of how irresponsible it is, its not the childs fault... yet you still dont want the state to help that child... there is the issue of being practical, i highly doubt you will jail a poor woman for having kids. at least i think... im hoping you want the child to live, i hope... if you are pro life- which i am, then you should want the state to provide birth control for poor people. - what is the other option? within reason or even out of control birth rates, there is something disturbing/orwellian about allowing rich people to have kids and not poor people... Please point out where anyone has said that we don't want the state to help the child. What most are saying, that you fail to grasp for some reason, is we don't want the state to continue to "reward" people for having children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) Please point out where anyone has said that we don't want the state to help the child. What most are saying, that you fail to grasp for some reason, is we don't want the state to continue to "reward" people for having children. so what happens to the child? this applies to people who dont want poor people to have access to birth control from the state... but either way, you cant force birth control or sterlize people, i think....lol so yeah, what happens to the child? dont worry about disease or basic science, that will complicate things for u... Edited August 31, 2012 by MARCELL DAREUS POWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juror#8 Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 (edited) are you for population control? should we jail poor people for having kids? and at what point? and, who pays to put the woman in jail...?? 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... 4- enforce population control on poor people ( put poor women in jail). 5 - Eugenics Colonies combo of 1 and 4 5 alright, now pick one... this is why the right is sick in some areas and very dogmatic- regardless of how irresponsible it is, its not the childs fault... yet you still dont want the state to help that child... there is the issue of being practical, i highly doubt you will jail a poor woman for having kids. at least i think... im hoping you want the child to live, i hope... if you are pro life- which i am, then you should want the state to provide birth control for poor people. - what is the other option? within reason or even out of control birth rates, there is something disturbing/orwellian about allowing rich people to have kids and not poor people... or even jailing people or sterilizing people for population control... but hey, thats just me... Edited August 31, 2012 by Juror#8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 Please point out where anyone has said that we don't want the state to help the child. What most are saying, that you fail to grasp for some reason, is we don't want the state to continue to "reward" people for having children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted August 31, 2012 Share Posted August 31, 2012 are you for population control? should we jail poor people for having kids? and at what point? and, who pays to put the woman in jail...?? 1- let poor kids die 2- let the state help with birth control for poor/middle class people 3- let the state help with poor children... 4- enforce population control on poor people ( put poor women in jail). combo of 1 and 4 alright, now pick one... this is why the right is sick in some areas and very dogmatic- regardless of how irresponsible it is, its not the childs fault... yet you still dont want the state to help that child... there is the issue of being practical, i highly doubt you will jail a poor woman for having kids. at least i think... im hoping you want the child to live, i hope... if you are pro life- which i am, then you should want the state to provide birth control for poor people. - what is the other option? within reason or even out of control birth rates, there is something disturbing/orwellian about allowing rich people to have kids and not poor people... or even jailing people or sterilizing people for population control... but hey, thats just me... So the only reason a child born to an irresponsible woman will die is because the woman is poor? No other reason? No wonder you're only answer is "give more money from someone else." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts