Tsaikotic Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 looks like Buffalo was trying to steal TE Martin Rucker from the Cowboys..but they denied the Bills the chance...to bad..he was one that i was hoping the Bills drafted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Damn why couldn't they be asleep at the Wheel! 2 Super Bowl losses and now this! Damn cowgirls they really hate the Bills. Rucker would have probably been on the active roster and put on the field for a few plays against the Browns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I wouldn't call signing someone off a practice squad stealing, but I'm glad they are consistently trying to upgrade the team, even in tiny ways. Rucker had been a good prospect. The Cowboys must have thought he was pretty good, since they obviously had to cut a player to promote Rucker, who was going to be their #3 TE. Even if it was the previous #3 TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in STL Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 looks like Buffalo was trying to steal TE Martin Rucker from the Cowboys..but they denied the Bills the chance...to bad..he was one that i was hoping the Bills drafted Happy to hear that they are even thinking about TE. That is one position that Chan has not been able to get any production from. If they would have signed Rucker he would have had to dress for the game. Wonder who was getting cut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Happy to hear that they are even thinking about TE. That is one position that Chan has not been able to get any production from. If they would have signed Rucker he would have had to dress for the game. Wonder who was getting cut? McCargo? PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Happy to hear that they are even thinking about TE. That is one position that Chan has not been able to get any production from. If they would have signed Rucker he would have had to dress for the game. Wonder who was getting cut? Probably Caulcrick. Although it could have been Martin or Stupar, or even IRing Nelson. Not sure what they would do with 4 TEs but we probably don't need two FBs, as I think Caulcrick was added to the active roster because there was a question of whether McIntyre would be able to play, along with the injury to Spiller. Now that Spiller is back, and McIntyre is healthy, there is no need for the extra FB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurlyBurly51 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I too wanted to see us draft him, but in hindsight it turns out to be no big deal as the guy hasn't done squat in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsVet Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 It's guys like Rucker and Chase Coffman who put up huge numbers at TE's at Missouri that just dont' translate into the NFL. Worth a look, but it's more proof that college numbers typically aren't indicative of success in the NFL. The spread offenses skew a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in STL Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 McCargo? PTR McCargo does not dress so cutting him does not solve the problem. I think that the acquired player has to dress? Agree that one of the FBs or a TE would have been a target. Oh well, nothing to be concerned with right now, unless you are on the roster and on the fringe. I have not since Stupar in a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I too wanted to see us draft him, but in hindsight it turns out to be no big deal as the guy hasn't done squat in the league. Thats very questionable logic. He is behind one great TE, one good TE, and the a team that has a log jam at the position chooses to lose someone else instead of him. That should show you he may be a victim of a crowded roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 McCargo does not dress so cutting him does not solve the problem. I think that the acquired player has to dress? Agree that one of the FBs or a TE would have been a target. Oh well, nothing to be concerned with right now, unless you are on the roster and on the fringe. I have not since Stupar in a long time. I believe they only need to be on the 53 man roster and not the practice squad. Rucker must have been on the Cowboys practice squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 I believe they only need to be on the 53 man roster and not the practice squad. Rucker must have been on the Cowboys practice squad. Did you deduce that after reading the link by the OP that stated the "Bills tried to sign Rucker from the practice squad"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPicc2114 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Martin Rucker.. he was one of my favorite Mizzou tight ends.. him and Chase Coffman were beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Did you deduce that after reading the link by the OP that stated the "Bills tried to sign Rucker from the practice squad"? Why so serious? There had been talk about him not getting playing time and being stuck behind others. Wow, I wonder where that came from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benderbender Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 2 catches for 17 yards career stats. How could we have not gotten in on that? Fire Gailey! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Too bad. Don't know whether he can play or not, but the Bills think enough of him to try and sign him. It continues to be refreshing that Nix & Co.aren't asleep at the wheel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Thats very questionable logic. He is behind one great TE, one good TE, and the a team that has a log jam at the position chooses to lose someone else instead of him. That should show you he may be a victim of a crowded roster. The Cowboys had to cut a 2nd year TE who had done even less than Rucker had. So it wasn't a numbers game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoner7 Posted December 1, 2010 Share Posted December 1, 2010 Whatever happend to his college teammate Chase Coeffman? I believe he was cut by the Bungals this preseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 (edited) Bills signed a no name TE off the Jags PS, Mike Caussin. 6'5 250+ rookie from James Madison. Maybe Shawn Nelson is really hurt and will be IR'd. http://www.nfldrafts...=2010&genpos=TE Decent mini interview with him. Sounds like the kind of hard worker Nix and Gailey like. http://www.draftboardinsider.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?action=display&id=220&title=Mike%20Caussin%20Interview Edited December 2, 2010 by Kelly the Fair and Balanced Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted December 2, 2010 Share Posted December 2, 2010 They probably had a thicker file on him from watching Arthur Moats. Something caught the scout's eye and his name popped up when they went scrounging around for another TE. Nelson's got migranes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts