Jump to content

ddaryl

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ddaryl

  1. there were some significant changes made over the last 2 decades the heavily favor the offense and to protect the QB in the NFL. Yeah I prefer the NFL of the 80's and 90's over today's product.
  2. I'd buy myself some cocaine FA combine and the draft can not get here fast enogh if this board is going ot be littered with these posts
  3. move all this !@#$ing crap to another god damn forum jmart71 was Jonathan Martins twitter handle and it no longer exists do to twitter bullying NM it was ig post.... still has no buisiness being posted on the stadium wall IMO..
  4. Offer them Moulson and Gorges and Bogosian
  5. Its pretty obvious they are planning to do soemthing.
  6. When did cheaper = better in regards to the QB position. Any QB making bank at least has proven they can play at the NFL level.. Cheaper just means unproven. Someone like Cousins who has put up top 10 QB numbers for 3 seasons in a row is going to be the prime FA QB acqusistion, and Cousins will get paid very well... This is assuming Brees never hits the market.
  7. Overdorf has nothing to do with the players who are no longer here because they no longer fit the scheme of the new regime. I'm also pretty sure any major salaries handed out were given a seal of approval from Whaley and the Pegulas. Keep swapping out Head Coaches and GM and this is the end result. The only ones to blame for this dead cap mess are th ePegulas and their asssanine hiring of Rex Ryan, and then allowuing Whaley to re-rearrange th eroster fo Rex only to see us re re re arraging the roster for Beane and McD. Bottom line is we need ot stick with Beane and McD for 5 years minimum no matter what or at least learn how ot hire a GM coach that fits the exitsting talent pool instead of scrapping a roster every 2 - 3 years...
  8. I feel the combine should only be useful when trying to determine which of 2 or more closely rated prospects you should take. In no way should any player dramtically move up or down a draft oard based on the ocmbine. As you said a tool in addition to
  9. Step 1, cut a hole in the box Step 2, Put your junk in the box Step 3, make her open the box
  10. Personally I would rather be with family and friends on this day. Not stuck in some building wearing a suit patiently waiting for a brief moment on stage and boring interview questions from the peanut galley press
  11. I like scenario #2 the best. Mayfiled is the best QB in this draft IMO But since FA comes 1st you probably kick the tires on Cousins 1st
  12. It would be horrible to reach for project QB's and have none of them pan out. Better off iMO trading back from 21 or 22 gain extra 2nd / 3rd rd picks and grab the project QB. IMO its either Make a bold move in FA and grab Cousins or make th ebold move and move up in this draft or hope one of the top 3 fall to 21.. If not any of those scenarios take the project QB in day 2 IMO Go big or go home
  13. If we don't pick up a top FA QB or move up in this draft I wouldn't pick any leftover QB's like Rudolph, Allen or Jackson till late 2nd or 3rd round. These are project QB's and wil take a year or 3 to develop IMO I just do not see Allen Rudolph or Jackson as 1st rd worthy although a team may reach for them early. Heck I wouldn't touch Allen in the 2nd.
  14. best damn internet video ever
  15. Cousins was drafted in the 4th round. I guess thats a day 3 pick.. I was thinking 3rd round and NO I don't care if this is TT's story. We are moving on
  16. I'd rather sign Cousins and draft the best DT at 21 or 22
  17. LMAO at the fallicy that somehow Flutie just wins.. His NFL career was bolstered by stint with Buffalo's #1 Defense after that barley average in the W L column.. Flutie is the most over rated QB Buffalo fans make up... I throw up every time someone mentions him as some sort of delusional positive QB reference As for considering McCarron.. thats one of the nuttiest ideas this offseason. He's no better than teir 2 rookie in regards ot our best options IMO
  18. OK you got me on technicalitties and the very rare very slight annomally Lamar or Allen are not accurate enough at the college lvl to waste a day 1 pick on. Thats what I am saying. Nobody should be trading picks to move up to get them or even wasting a precious 1st rd pick on them. Someone will and i hope to god its not the Bills cause if its the Bills then I'm just going to cry because I have no faith in a franchise that would waste a 1st rd pick on any top QB prospect with less than 60% college compeltion percentage. You want to find a diamond in the orugh you find them in the latter rounds not the 1st round. you're right I didn't say every single thought to the letter, my god I would have to type a novel to cover every little tid bit and possible annomally. But I wouldn't of drafted Wilson in the 1st rd, and neither did anyone else..... Which is what I say about Lamar and Allen pick them up in the late 2nd or 3rd nothing sooner. Maybe they turn out to be decent QB's but I would never gamble on that with a 1st rd pick. Wilson was a gamble and it paid off but it was a 3rd rd gamble not a mortgage the future gamble. Go through the last 10 drafts and find QB's that maintained top 15 status. Many of them were drafted 1st rd most of them had College Completion of 60% Here is a list of this years top 15 QBs. Staffor is the really only Anommally. Ryan missed by 0.01% which to me is a round up and callit 60% Tom Brady 61.9% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html 6th round pick Phillip RIvers 63.6% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/philip-rivers-1.html 1st rd pick Mathew Stafford 57.1% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/matthew-stafford-1.html 1st rd pick Drew Brees 61.1% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/drew-brees-1.html 2nd rd pick Ben Roethlesberger 65.5% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/ben-roethlisberger-1.html 1st rd pick Matt Ryan 59.9% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/matt-ryan-1.html 1st rd pick Kirk Cousins 64.1% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/kirk-cousins-1.html 4th rd pick Alex Smith 66.3% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/alex-smith-3.html 1st rd pick Russel Wilson 60.1% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/russell-wilson-1.html 3rd rd pick Jared Goff 62.3% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jared-goff-1.html 1st rd pick Blake Bortles 65.7% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/blake-bortles-1.html 1st rd pick Case Keenum 69.4% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/case-keenum-1.html UNDRAFTED FA Jameis WInston 66.0% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jameis-winston-1.html 1st rd pick Derek Carr 66.7% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/derek-carr-1.html 1st rd pick Eli Manning 60.8% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/eli-manning-1.html 1st rd pick 2016 not listed above top 15 for this year Aaron Rodgers 63.8% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/aaron-rodgers-1.html 1st rd pick Joe Flacco (Played divsion AA Deleware so stats were hard ot find ut 63.4% at Delaware http://www.espn.com/nfl/news/story?id=3350135 1st rd pick Andrew Luck 67.0% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/andrew-luck-1.html 1st rd pick Carson Plamer 59.1% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/carson-palmer-1.html 1st rd pick Andy Dalton 61.7% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/andy-dalton-1.html 2nd rd pick 2015 not listed above top 15 for this year Ryan Tannenhill 62.5% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/ryan-tannehill-1.html `st rd pick Ryan Fitzpatrick 59% approximate hard ot find the stats but this was an eyeball average 7rd pick I mean we can discuss the possibilites of finding a hidden gem but the fact is if your drafting a QB in round #1 you do not waste that pick on a QB who has a sub par 60% college completion record.... you have 3 annomallies (4 if you want ot include Matt Ryans 59.9% in here) in the last 3 seasons reachng top 15 in the NFL in a single season. There are not many GMs in football proving to be smarter than the rest and grabbing a Russel Wilson type in the 1st rd.. Nope they wait and take a chance on a Russel Wilson type in round 3 Joe Flacco, Stafford, Palmer may be a case for a guy like Allen but that don't happen often enough to support a reach IMO because mor etimes than not they don't pan out. Flacco gets mentioned because he played AA ball in Delaware. SO I would rather trade away the entire draft and move up and get the best we can get then to settle and reach for a Lamar or Allen at 21.... I owuld rather take a flyer on a rd 2 or 3 guy 1st....
  19. You can throw this stuff at me all day, and I used to be the same way... Use to hunt down all kinds of different stats etc... Bottom line every single QB that I tried to justify with secondary stats never panned out or was an OK QB in the pros at best. If you look at the best of the best in the NFL, those who are always competing for playoffs or destinied to be enshrined in HOF or already are you're not going ot find to many anommalies with less than 60% in college. If you do its usulaly a QB who has at least %9% like Carson Palmer Now if the bills sit back then grab Lamar in the late 2nd or 3rd rd then so be it, but he is not accurate enough to take any earlier IMO neither is Allen. If we are going that route then we have to land a top FA vet. My opinion remains Lamar and Allen are a late day 2 or day 3 option, anything else is a reach and could very well set any franchise backwards IMO. Hope its any other club but the Bills
  20. well this means little. When I read this graphic I assume that Lamar threw the deep ball 75% of the time to bring his completion % down so much because this graphic says he is ridiculously accurate passer which the game tapes scouting reports and the stats do not support plus there are lots of reports that all say Lamar has accuracy issues doesn't lead his WR's well etc...
  21. Brees threw for 60% consistently. Matt Ryan averaged 59.9% The others were all in the 59% area and actually had 60% in there last year. Russel WIlson actually had 72.8% in his last year when he transferred to Wisconsin. Palmer is the lowest of the bunch but actually pulled our a solid 63.8% his last year. Yeah these are on the cusp of the 60% threshold, so there can be some wiggel room, btu when compared to Allen or Lamar you just don't waste a 1st or 2nd rd pick open these types of QB's IMO. You can tear it apart but your retort did nothing to change my view on what QB's are worthy of a 1st rd pick. I would NOT TAKE A CHANCE ON ALLEN OR LAMAR based 100% on what I know.. Accuracy can not be taught if a QB does not have it he will not find it in the pros. Mechanics can be refined but accuracy is a have it or not situation IMO. SO lets look at Lamar and Allen and compare then to the 4 on this list.. There not even close in regards to completion % of reaching the 60% mark Lamar avg 57% and his best year was Carson Palmers average of 59.1% https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/lamar-jackson-1.html and Josh Allen 56.2% college career completion % Not even worth looking at but maybe the 3rd rd. Anyone who drat Allen earlier is wasting a pick IMO https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/josh-allen-7.html
  22. accuracy can not be taught. You either have it or you don't/ if you have it you can refine it, but if your a college QB who couldn't complete more than 60% consistently it ain't never going to happen in the pros (See Josh Allen) Lamar is intruiging but you're not fixing the accuracy worries
  23. Lots of people seem to agree with his take on work load for student athletes. Are you sure Peyton didn't get some special treatment where many other less star athletes didn't. it seemed to me Rosen was advocating for many other student athletes who will need to depend on those college degrees but their football workload made it harder for them to get the degrees they wil need to be successful. might be interesting to know how many college football players utilize their college degrees when college is done
  24. Did you even look into what he said and why he said it.. I just went through that whole thing and I fail to see what he said was wrong..In fact most discussions on the topic support and understand what Rosen said and why he said it. Non issue in my book...
×
×
  • Create New...