keepthefaith

Whatever the Obama's had planted, tear that **** up.

Cillizza is really a scum bag masquerading as a journalist.

CNN has been tabloid-esque since the 2016 campaign. They are bashing Trump 24/7. Unfortunately it's probably not hurting them business-wise as there is a large audience of Trump haters who can go there to get their fix all day.

I agree Orton was better but it's never right to say any NFL player sucks. These guys, even the ones that get cut are elite athletes. Many are just better than others. QB is a league-wide problem. There are not 32 starting quarterbacks in the league that teams are happy with. I'll be shocked if TT is the Bills starter next year, but give credit to this front office and coaching staff for giving him a year to show them he's the guy long term or not.

Tolbert seems to lack power for a guy his size.

I think there is zero chance McD starts Peterman. Bills still have a playoff shot, 1 game of additional experience for NP this season doesn't change his status for next season and my strong hunch is that the players will want Tyrod to start the game. Plus McD already said that TT would start the rest of the season if healthy and reversing that decision would hurt his credibility with the players. All good reasons to start Tyrod.

Didn't see enough evidence of lack of possession or failure to get feet in on the replays to overturn the call.

Tony Romo made some very astute analysis during the game in a polite way when talking about TT. Gave credit where due but also made criticisms that pointed out his weaknesses.

The wide receivers are lying awake in their beds Hoping Tyrod will throw them the ball like he said

It would be fair to add QB rushes to their passing stats. Consider each run a completion and add the rushing yardage to their passing yardage totals. Tyrod's shortcomings aren't so much what he produces but what he fails to produce, missed opportunities.

Agree. Running QBs rarely hold up over the long haul.

3000 or so families would take great offense to that statement.

And like a good soldier of the left, you're assuming that these tax cuts will reduce revenue to the federal government and that the spending side is untouchable. Time will tell.

Hearing anyone on the left complain about debt/deficits is exceptionally humorous.

Maybe not since once we got in there we decided to nation build, sort of. Going into Iraq was really stupid IMO. You can't fix people that don't want to be fixed or aren't committed to the cause. Israel is in a really tough spot as even an ageeable 2-state solution doesn't solve their beef with the Palestinians and vice versa unless the neighboring countries have total buy-in for peace.

Yeah but you have to have the trust and respect of at least most of the players. If you don't have that you won't get their best and most willing effort. Goes for any organization. You don't have to love the boss but if there is a strong dislike or again that lack of trust and respect and/or disbelief in the approach to the mission, you don't get the best possible results from people and people don't stick around. Yes good move and Dareus unfortunately for the Bills may finally get the message after being moved.

I find utilities to be quite a bargain compared to the continual increases in taxes (other than federal taxes), health insurance and all other types of insurance for that matter.

That's what's great about this country. You can live the RV lifestyle and I can choose a bigger house with lights on all over the place and a big garage full of fossil fuel burning toys. That is until the leftists regain power and change the rules.

Rookie. He'll know what to work on during the off season. If he comes back next year with the same issues - bust.

I wouldn't call KB a legit #1. #2 yes. He's a bit of a 1 trick pony with his size advantage but lacks the speed and the hands to be a game changer. He's no Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall or Alshon Jeffrey. Bills need a #1 pretty badly IMO and he doesn't have to be a big guy.

Agree. It seems like there are 3 sets of catch rules. One for the end zone, one for the sideline and one for within the field of play. This may not be true but when you watch how games are officiated, it appears there are 3 different interpretations of what is/isn't a catch.

Anyone remember the '87 Bills? Finished 7-8 in the strike year. Looked pretty good down the stretch of the season and hurt their draft position in doing so when they had a lot of needs. Learned how to win though and in '88 they were great.

As the weeks wear on don't you see the folly of continuing to push that association?

That depends on what the definition of "is" is.

On what basis? Gronk strikes me as a jerk. Tyrod, no but make your case.