DC Tom

C'mon...you prefer "eleventy-one" over Euler's identity? Go eat some more paste.

That's all? Hell, that cheaper than the Starr report.

Or...is there??? WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!!1!!!11!1!1OneOneOne!1!!(-e^i(pi))

There is nothing of substance in thsl list. It's not even good activism. "Empower the next generation." To do WHAT???? Empowerment is not a goal in and of itself, morons.

Carl Weathers Plausible. He, through Halliburton, provided the Hillary the assassination team that killed Epstein.

I will never vote for a Democrat again in my life.

Ruth Buzzy

I don't want to get involved in this pissing match, but I've got to admit, this is pretty damn funny.

Trump is still Hitler though, right?

Kind of like how we watched Assad use chemical weapons, and Obama didn't do a thing. Or watched S. Ossetia get invaded, and Obama...well, he did something. He lifted sanctions on Russia. Or how Russia complained about an ABM system in Europe, and Obama cancelled it. Or how Russia "hacked our elections," and Obama didn't do a thing. Wait...who's Putin's puppet, again?

There's other sources of photo evidence that show a tennis court. Relying on Google Earth to be the end-all and be-all of overhead imagery is actually ######ed.

And you completely ignored my deconstruction of DR's theory, above.

Oh, that's awesome. Time to personally contribute my own cloning conspiracy info to it.

The tennis court did exist when the satellite footage was taken. It was recently taken down. The question isn't "Why did google put a fake court there?" It's "Why was the tennis court demolished?" And before that, why was the weird-ass courtyard demolished for a tennis court?

I'd like to know what sort of "hunter" hunts with just a pocket knife.

Now, when a child comes across the border with a family member, the entire family can be held together, thus ending family separations: I'm sure the Left is happy.................right ? Decades-old "rule?" It's not a rule, it's an agreement. Maybe - and here's a wacky thought - Democrats should stop relying on "agreements" and "memos" and "feelings," and actually pass binding laws. Which is what the Trump Administration actually wants.

If Hillary had won and suggested this, she'd be purchasing it for Putin.

I find it odd that progressives found this was perfectly acceptable when Omar said it. Which makes me believe Trump said it in no small part to get Omar to defend Israel.

We didn't have to. We could sit in the dark when we ran out of incandescents. Or use LED bulbs now...

He always struck me a something of a weird dude. Although not "crazy weird" like this.

Remember 40 years ago, when the government just told you to wear a sweater?

And the EEZs of the various Arctic nations.

"Dark energy" is a horrible kludge of a term masquerading as theory. It's the most awful thing to grace physics since the "luminiferous aether." Of course, demonstrating the luminiferous aether was the first great triumph of both modern physics and the American physics community. So as execrable as "dark energy" is, I'm excited about what it portends for the future. "Dark matter" doesn't bug me nearly as much - we can "see" it, just not in visible light. To an astronomer, that's really nothing new - visible light is a truly lousy observation medium. All the good telescopes these days work in near-infrared.